I'm looking for a bang for the buck digital video camera (at least 1080p capable) and an external microphone. I'm planning to use it for vlogging and singing, nothing more.
I'm just looking for something to do the job for reasonable price, nothing professional.
I'm a complete n00b and I know nothing about video cameras so...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
are you fucking inbred I said use the general
>>2713785
>>2734284
Yes, I am.
>>2734283
>vlogging and singing
please play in traffic
PHOTOSHOP: Can you please put the "fuck me up" hair on him? Please. Also make his eyes read like if he's tearing up
>>2741923
>>2741960
I can't.
This thread was moved to >>>/wsr/31259
Hey fellas?
I'm using adobe premiere, how do I edit and merge videos in to other videos? (Like editing faces in the video, meme type of stuff)
https://instagram.com/p/BARA74dzcLq/
Any pointers or programs you guys use?
>>2739492
After Effects
>How do I learn to use video software?
>photography
tech support is over there >>>/g/
I want to get a pocket camera.
The Pentax Q has plummeted in price and the older Ricoh GRD2 is also pretty low in price.
Neither has an optical viewfinder . . but i can put one on if i feel the need.
Both have the same sensor size. Both are about the same pickles.
only advantage is the Q can switch lenses and i can get the 8.5mm prime if i dont like the kit zoom. but that 5.6 crop ratio . . . what lenses could i possibly use.
how do i choose.
>>2707662
the pentax has a whole line of lenses
>>2707662
are the pickles kosher?
>>2707698
Mega pickles from B&H are always kosher
Hey /p/. I am going to Iceland in a couple of weeks and I intend to photograph the Northern Lights if I'm lucky. I want to know how decent of a picture I would get from my current camera. I do not intend to purchase another, so I hope that's not an answer I receive. Here are the details:
>Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ200
>It's DSLR-"like" compact (off to a bad start, I know)
>Lowest aperture f/2.8 .. 60 sec max shutter speed
Can I get a good picture? Have it look decent in color, maybe some scenery in the background etc.? I can't even find a sample pic of someone trying (probably a bad sign).
Pic is some guy using a LUMIX-G5 (Mirrorless, I believe)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1001 Scene Capture Type Standard
can you adjust the iso?
>>2739463
Yeah, I think it goes to 3200 but it get just a tad grainy over 800.
It'll always be grainy after 800
How do I go about this? I have my own website with a section of it devoted to the shows that I have shot, but those shows have been at my cousins venue in NYC.
The websites of venues I want to go to and photograph bands don't have any sort of contact page or submission process defined on their website for press passes. Have any of you shot at Toad's place in New Haven CT, or Oakdale Theatre in Wallingford CT? or the Iron Horse Auditorium in North Hampton Mass??
Should I just call the venue and ask what the venue's managers email is?
Help /p/
most of the time you'll need to contact the bands manager. They're the ones in charge of photo passes.
you're either gonna request the band's touring manager or the venue's press coordinator
after a little googling, toad's place is fairly small so it shouldn't be hard while oakdale is pretty big. iron horse seems in the middle. not sure what artists you're trying to shoot but that plays a big part
bigger bands couldn't give less of a fuck about you or your photos. they're touring for weeks and the same photos are gonna be snapped over and over again
the people who truly care about those repeat boring photos are local publications and that's usually your safest bet
i dunno man just wing it. email everybody. call everybody. take photos. sneak your camera in. play dumb.
When i shoot lightbulbs whit my D5300 i get these weird blue ghosts that behave almost like lens flares. I asumed something was wrong whit my lens but used a different one and got the same problem. Is there something wrong whit my camera?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 858 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:07 22:50:10 Exposure Time 2 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 697 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Clean your lens, take off any filters, put on a hens hood.
I get flaring on my 56mm 1.2 XF often, but usually it's because there's something on the lens and I'm not using a hood.
>>2739130
UV filter on? they cause huge glare and ghosting sometimes.
>>2739130
The light is hitting your sensor, bouncing back, hitting your rear element, and then going back to your sensor again. It's a common problem.
Hey /p/ can we have a camera bag thread? maybe both content of bag and bag itself?
>pic related is from
http://fox-orian.tumblr.com/post/40475416656
>bag is incase dslr sling
a pentax k-50 with a da 35mm 2.4
I didn't post a pic because I'd have to use it to take a picture of it
Canon 700D
Hey /p/, I have a weird issue.
I recently bought an Olympus OM-System F.Zuiko Auto-S 50mm f1.8 lens, and it works perfectly fine, but my camera has a weird issue.
On manual setting in Still Shot Mode, the Live View image is a lot darker than the final image the camera takes which is verrry annoying.
However if I move the camera into Video Mode the Live View image is accurate to any pictures or footage I shoot there.
Now normally that'd be fine, but in Video Mode it won't obviously let me change my shutter speed to any slower than 1/24th of a second, which I'd want if I was doing photography
The strange thing is, on Arpeture Priority (or any of the other settings) the image displayed is accurate, although it gives me the stupid auto setting shit which I hate.
I dun get it /p/, why my camera screwing me over in Manual setting in Still Mode?
It doesn't portray a very accurate image on shutter priority mode either
From my experiences using Manual lenses on the EOS M & M3 system.
Live View doesn't support manual lenses very well. If you stop down, the image will become darker in liveview but focusing will be accurate.
Shutter speed matters a tonne here. You want to pay attention to the camera lightmeter/exposure bar when shooting with manual glass.
A trick to using the Canon Liveview system when it's too dark stopped down is to increase your iso, focus, reset iso to desired target and set your shutter speed accordingly.
It's not the best system in the world but you can certainly make it work.
>>2738491
>Olympus OM-System F.Zuiko Auto-S 50mm f1.8 lens
>why.jpg
On a sea of awesome manual lenses like Takumars, Voigtlanders, Nikkors, FDs etc. You got to pick a Zuiko.
Found some abandoned machinery.
Show me your abandoned things
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:04 00:19:02 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.27 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 10.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2738383
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:04 00:15:13 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.27 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2738386
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:04 00:12:02 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/4.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 1.19 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2738392
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:04 00:13:10 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.89 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Hi!
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I thought you guys might be able to help me out: my Panasonic lumix GF7 recently fell from an 1 meter high window sill. Now, when I turn it on, it's showing these horizontal colored stripes on the screen (screen itself is fine, menu and everything is working, nothing wrong with the lens either). It looks like something is wrong with the sensor, however I'm not entirely sure.
I opened up the camera to take a look, but I don't dare to remove the ribbons, so I can't really see what's up with the sensor. Maybe you guys have a clue? I hope it's just a loose ribbon or something (that can be easily re-attached by someone with a more steady hand and better tools), otherwise it's probably not worth fixing (I bought it second hand for half the original price, and figured that fixing a sensor might be really expensive).
Attached is a picture of how the screen looks like! When I do manual zoom, the stripes distort! ISO and all these functions are not working tho.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 5s Camera Software 9.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:02 18:49:32 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 40 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 11.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2738114
BTW I meant vertical stripes, not horizontal! Sorry!
>>2738114
Send it in for a repair, it looks like the sensor got dislodged from it's place with the electonic contacts.
Be prepared for a hefty price.
>>2738114
>my Panasonic lumix GF7 recently fell from an 1 meter high window sill
>Maybe you guys have a clue?
...What are you expecting as an outcome from posting this? You dropped your camera and its fucked, we can't unfuckulate it from the internet take it to a shop you dense mother fucker
Gear Thread
New thread for a New Year.
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new. You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous thread: >>2734885
I don't want to get a new DSLR because I can't be fucked spending money on glass.
How's the Fujifilm X30?
>>2737067
Buy an older used DSLR, the kit lens will be more than enough for some time. After that you will likely to learn about cheap old glass and adapting them.
>>2737067
Hello friends, i have a question for those who used this lens, is it worth 364 eurobucks? I'm not afraid to use full manual and to be frank this is going to be my first prime lens i'll buy, or should i get the 50mm 1.4 from cannon?
Also newbie question general i guess.
>>2736712
Just shut the fuck up.
>>2736715
meet me somwhere motherfucker.
>>2736712
I'm sure it will be an okay lens. I've used the 14mm and it was alright, definitely soft in the corners. If you're willing to spend more, go with the sigma 50mm, it's better than the canon 1.4. And I'm not talking about the sigma art series lens, just the regula 50 1.4 that costs around 400 USD
Been searching and can find them anywhere. Can someone help me? Thanks
would also like these presets pls
>>2737708
is it available in hald clut?
Here you go, gearqueers. It's out.
http://www.fujirumors.com/leaked-first-official-images-of-the-fujifilm-x-pro2-see-it-with-xf35mmf2-attached/
That square LED light is all I've ever dreamed of.
>never ever gonna get full frame
no thanks
>>2731214
Medium Format's coming, dag.
FF is just a useless midpoint between APS-C and MF