Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 533. page

I love the look bro.

>>2730772
>added digital grain

File: 20151227-R0015265.jpg (978KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 1000x750px

>>2730783

nada

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH
Camera Model	GR Digital
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:27 22:42:12
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Brightness	5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.90 mm
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard

The infrared XT1? You uh...turn it on.
The regular XT1? Fujis are a little more IR sensitive than most cameras and can do it decently, but you obviously need a filter to block your visible light.

If your dilemma is the former, I dunno how to help you, read the manual. If its the latter, you can't shoot infrared without an IR filter. Get yourself a cheap 720nm or something on ebay if you wanna experiment.

>>2734489
You need a filter to put on the lens to cut out everything that isn't IR.

Because it removes a lot of light, the photos will require more time to take.

Digital cameras usually feature physical IR blocking filters that are essentially part of the sensor itself - they can't be disabled by a software setting. With some cameras you can physically remove this filter (or more likely pay somebody to do it for you), but with others it's impossible without destroying the sensor. Removing the filter is pretty much permanent and the camera will then only be useful for shooting IR.

The less extreme/permanent option is to buy a filter for your lens that blocks everything but IR light and then use extremely long exposures, until eventually enough light gets through the sensor's IR filter to produce an exposure. This is obviously only any good for scenes that don't move.

Top fucking kek, anon.

>>2733863
You would not be the first to do this, and the people who do it find it very effective, though ergonomically fiddley. I've seen a few behind the scenes videos of people making great lifestyle and boudoir style portraits using that setup.

>>2733876
what.

just use a dslr???

File: Low Res (9 of 13).jpg (170KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 400x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:01 21:31:43
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Low Res (13 of 13).jpg (66KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 400x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:01 21:31:53
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

i thought that was a stock photo

maybe that's the problem?

good luck analysing that shit though

I can't choose between 35mm or 50mm so I just use my 24-70mm f/2.8. I don't really shoot wide too often nor think 70mm is much longer than 50mm.

If there was a 35-50mm f/1.8 lens, I would be set for life.

File: _DSF0048.jpg (442KB, 833x1250px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 833x1250px

>>2731917
For street - 35mm
For portraits - 85mm/greater than 150mm
For travel - 24-27mm
For concerts - 40mm

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

on FF:

50mm
85mm

I usually use a 28mm and a 50mm on a 1.5 crop sensor so it gets kind of close

please guys, i hope u could help me, it's very important..

>>2732812
Have some patience, senpai. /p/ is a slow board.

sorry dude, you're right..

>>2727668
he should clip his fucking nails

my old 400D has been sitting on a shelf without a bodycap or lens on it for over 4 years
who cares man, its a rebel. just answer your friends question, you slimy autist.

>>2727668
Don't be a jerk. Camera is just a tool, no need to carry it like a baby. Nothing else then can't be solved with air blow can happen here.

>>2727325
Pentax P30 and Pentax-A SMC 50mm 1.7

Still using it 30 years later. Shoots like the day I bought it in 1985

File: 1442026610400.jpg (415KB, 1424x2048px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1424x2048px

>>2727325
Started with a Sony SLT a65, a Samyang 85mm f1.4 and a beercan (minolta 70-210 f4). Wanted to go full frame so i upgraded to a D750, sold all my lenses and bought a 24-70 tamron f2.8. IQ was solid but i missed my sony too much, I wanted to go back to an EVF so bad. Finally i traded my Nikon for an A7 II, kept that sweet tamron and bought an old nikon 180mm f2.8 and i've never been happier

>>2727334
Nice, went with this d7000 because I think Nikon's got better lenses for my price range. Was gonna' get an AIS 135, but with the crop sensor it was just a bit too tele for me. So- I just went with this 60 instead.

>>2734422
>1. Using an ISO over 200.
literally never seen anyone complain unless it's in the upper thousands and seriously impacts a picture which would have benefited from sharpness
>2. Having images that aren't 100% sharp.
same as the above really, only comes up when it impacts an image negatively such as when your subject blends with the background rather than jump out of it
>3. Not using a lens hood.
who the fuck uses a lens hood whenever the camera's out of the bag and who the fuck doesn't put it back on when it's in the bag
>4. Not using a camera strap.
>implying camera straps aren't nerd-tier, wrist straps where it's at
>5. Using P mode on a DSLR.
>snob
>using an advanced camera designed for intelligent use with an automatic setting
you're not a snob if you look down on absolute tards
>6. Changing lens in an unsatisfactory manner.
what in the christ is this I never even heard of this
>7. Using phones to take photos.
I hope nobody's actually bothered by this
>8. Thinking that white balance can be used for artistic effect.
it can be but it looks like ass 99% of the time
if you want to play with white balance the best way to go is shooting RAW and experimenting in photoshop
>>9. Having blown highlights.
not having blown highlights is objectively superior to having blown highlights
>10. Considering buying a mirror-less camera.
but mirrorless cameras are getting more and more respect all the time?????????

0/10, triggered, snobby hong kong british wanker tries too hard
they really are a pretty shite channel overall, shitty humour + cameras
some of their advice is ken rockwell-tier

>>2734492
What pisses me off is you're an American using the word "shite". newfuggityfug gtfo

>>2734508
>you're an American
cite proof m8
I'm not a bong either by the way

>>2734421
Depends, fag.

>>2734421
a7ii

>>2734421

d610 all day

don't buy sony a7. buy a6000 or a7r

The histogram can tell you about the differences in lights and shadows, is this what you're looking for?

>>2734363

shadows look solarized lmao. what a shitty pic.

>>2734366

Not so much, more to compare specific points on the image. So for example how many stops brighter is the ice by the climbers left hand compared to the bottom right hand corner.

Hey guys Ive been looking into the samsung nx1 but I hear samsung might be getting out of the camera market. Im not entirely sure what that would mean? Should that automatically mean I shouldnt get the NX1?

>>2733291
Samsung is dead, forget about it mate. Go for a K-3 instead or wait until spring for a K-3III

>>2733291
There are better alternatives (compensate features for price)
Buy fooji and make isi happy.

Any cheap 5DM2 shutter remotes and external lighting/ring flashes? Would like brand name or just link to eBay or something and price.

Also, a way to have a time lapse on 5DM2

>>2723402
It depends entirely on your setup. Lowest ISO you can, and whatever else is needed to get your exposure correct.

>>2723417
>nikon d3300 with vr ii 18-55mm lens

so iso 100, what to set the aperture and shutter speed to?

>>2723402
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgOTk4ApEYs

set iso 100 use a tipod if you can small apature long exposure.

millimeters

There are theories but no one knows for sure

>>2734653
millimeters of what?

>>2734619
Maybe you aren't very good.

How noticeable are curves adjustments supposed to be for someone who's never edited a photo before?

>>2734619
post before and after curves OP