Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 540. page

>>2725986
ya, not as good as 50mm, but not bad.

>>2725986
SS+Gomad claims one more.. ugh

>>2725986
who is this semen demon?

>>2729165
>>2729165
You sure you got the right adapter?

>>2729236
He probably didn't, he's dumber than those idiots who don't know how to take the lens off of one.

Why did you get an ILC in the first place if you were going to try and screw the fucking lens on like it was m42?

>>2729244
It worked with my 40 mm pancake, so it is suited for canon, just when I switched it, it jammed.

>>2729533
I'm sure it'll be fine. They don't tell you this in the shop but cameras are all pretty much the same. Also there's a gear thread for a reason.

>>2729533
Great call.

Red

GH4

>>2729226
10 x EosM

>>2728982
Judging from your dirty fingernails you are a nigger and the camera is probably stolen.
I'd return that camera to it's rightful owner and apologize.

>>2729011
Your grandchildren will probably be niggers.
But really, help.

>>2729028
No

>>2728211
>How good is this camera?
Good enough for your skill level
>Will this limit me in some way in the near future? What can I expect from this as I get better?
In the near future, no. Further on, yes. You'll know. Don't buy new gear just because you feel like you need an upgrade. Buy new gear when you feel constrained by your gear and you know exactly what's causing the constraint.
>Is it worth eventually (when I'm better) getting a new lens for this camera?
Absolutely. Glass (lenses) is much more important than bodies. I would recommend a 35mm prime as your first lens but that's just me.
>Or will I need to upgrade the camera itself as a natural upgrading progression.
You will but as I said, bodies are much less important

Also
>there's a fucking gear thread

>>2728223
Thanks bro!

i have the canon 600d and honestly it's a fine camera
if you get some decent glass the images get pretty sharp.
yes ofcourse there's better cameras, but for every 1% of better quality yo pay 10% more in the cameraworld, so unless you've got a ton of money to throw around i don't suggest buying anything new unless you really NEED it, you can do all of the basic stuff with the kit lens and a simple camera.

this is just a personal opinion but i do recommend getting prime lenses if you want to get more artsy, the canon 24mm stm and canon 50mm f1.8 are very cheap but have pretty great image quality (especially for their price)
also prime lenses are better for learning cause they'll force you to be more creative and move around and stuff.
but for now, don't worry about gear at all my friend,
gearfags will try to convince you that you need crazy expensive shit to be a good photographer, but remember, what you photograph is far more important than what you're using to do so.
if your favourite movie was shot on a shit camera, would you mind? probably not, because the story/characters/location are what draws us in.
just have fun shooting buddy

http://nikon.com/products/index.htm

We do not give technical support for unpopular proprietrary products. It is really bad idea to try solving hardware problems here instead of places which you should address first.

>>2728376
return to manufacturer

Sure it is. Especially if you like EVF.

But it's also kind of a dead end. A mount is dead man walking. OK If you can get it super cheap, and you're willing to buy cheapo Minolta era lenses, it's a fine choice.

There's a ton of way better cameras out there, maybe even in the price range. But it's not a piece of shit.

>>2728129
Rumors of a Mount death have been greatly exaggerated

>>2726252

Generally speaking, for photography you'll want an equatorial mount.

>>2726481
The 6 SE has a wedge for it, how would I get on without one though? Just at first to get the hang of using it, would I still be able to get some decent shots?

There are applications for phones to track stars, constellations, and such the issue is with deep magnification the objects are moving quickly relative to you so without the mount deeper astrophotography (galaxies fainter objects etc.) are much harder to do.

>>2726283
you should kill yourself

>>2726283
>no 4k
>no flippy screen
return it and get a g7

I would totally keep one of those, especially if it has the micro 12mm kit lens.

>asking about architecture photography
>visual acoustics screen grab for OP

It always kind of bums me out when someone's hoop dreams are so transparent and (probably) shallow.

Go assist a working photographer. No grouchy ass retired photographer is going to want to be your senpai (not a wordfilter), and it's not like there's a phone book full of them that you can just look up. It's relatively easy to find working photographers, however, and a few of them would probably be ecstatic to have an eager little slave lug all of their stuff around for morsels of knowledge.

File: araki-30.jpg (97KB, 780x651px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 780x651px

>>2729938

Why would I do that when I have several emails a week from /p/ browsing faggots asking to assist me

>implying working photographers are all god photographers

I cleared 150k in 2015 solely from photography and my photographs are only good/relevant for an extremely short amount of time.

>inb4 >bragging on 4chan

Not at all, I make a great living by networking and that is it, the photography itself requires almost no skill.

Your response indicates that good photographers are just working photographers which indicates you are the eager little slave putting hacks like me on a pedestal.

hack2
hak/
noun
noun: hack; plural noun: hacks

>a person who does dull routine work.

>>2729944

You sound like a great guy.

Best of luck.

File: 1417981469946.jpg (44KB, 480x418px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x418px

>>2729872
a picture of me fucking milla jovovich doggy style

>>2729898
A picture of me fucking Milla Jovovich doggy style.

You could either cut the shells out, put a white background on it and paint in the shadows, or you can use the clone stamp. It's a bit tricky, you want to make sure to match the tones of the shadows properly

>>2729698
Thanks for the reply, I think photoshop is a lost cause on this one...as they say, you can't polish a turd.
I'll re-shoot I guess, and this time round I won't be a dipstick.

Having said that, I did try clone stamping, and it was a disaster...

>>2729268
garbage framing.

File: DSC_9575.jpg (92KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1000x668px

>>2729197

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Ver.1.10
Photographer	Alex Suen
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	980
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:24 20:14:21
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3008
Image Height	2008
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_9596.jpg (114KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1000x668px

>>2729198

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Ver.1.10
Photographer	Alex Suen
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	980
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	20 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:24 23:47:36
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	7200
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3008
Image Height	2008
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Landscape
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_9577.jpg (75KB, 668x1000px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 668x1000px

>>2729201

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Ver.1.10
Photographer	Alex Suen
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	980
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:24 20:25:05
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3600
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3008
Image Height	2008
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown