File: 1024px-Photographic_Film_135.png (140KB, 1024x810px) Image search:
[Google]
140KB, 1024x810px
Anyone else feeling sad over the loss of film not only as a photographer but also as someone who looks at photographs?
I feel it made the world look more sterile. Photographs in magazines, on the internet, movies... almost all digital nowadays. Artists may be able to make digital look really good with editing but most people don't bother. With film they still made pleasing images that I might enjoy looking at. Film photographs have a painting like quality to me. They make an emotional impression on me because of the light and shadows and colors and tones. Digital only makes an impression on me because of the content in an image. Film shows while digital describes. These are my feelings.
Anyone can relate?
44 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2729708
It's nostalgia. Nothing more.
>>
>>2729709
Is that a meme because that made me laugh
>>
>>2729708
The thing that gets me with film is that you're closer to your images.
Try enlarging, correcting and printing a roll of 36 exposures. It takes for ever and requires a lot of skill and effort. But the prints are ones you immediately hold and can hang up, the satisfaction is incredible.
With digital you make some awesome photos, throw them into some folder on your PC, and never look at them again. Or worse yet, just throw them up on social media to get a handful of likes and that's that.
The problem with film is your typical pleb that sees a printed picture doesn't appreciate it at all. None of the time and effort to create it is seen, it's just down to what's shown on the image.
File: Le Paysage à Simon.jpg (210KB, 2048x463px) Image search:
[Google]
210KB, 2048x463px
>December 25th
>Undusting my Minolta Maxxum 3000i to use it throughout the Holidays
>Realize I'm out of film
>As I go buy some at Wal-Mart, stop to develop the ones I already used
>I go to the counter, and show them my 35mms
>They look at me completely puzzled
>«What's that?»
>mfw
>«... You're supposed to know that.»
>«Is it a battery?»
>Turn around, and never go back again.
What the fuck? Aren't they supposed to know what a goddamn 35mm film is, since they work in a «Photo Centre» ?!
Pic Unrelated.
22 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>baww my irrelevant medium is not recognized anymore by low-wage employees
>>
>>2730076
>35mm
>irrelevant
>>
>>2730065
Pay peanuts, employ monkeys
Go to a dedicated photography shop. You'll pay a bit more, but they'll appreciate your business and you'll appreciate their service and range of products
File: 20150807_202039.jpg (1MB, 2560x1920px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2560x1920px
/p/eople
pic related
post a photo from the year
3 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 20150807_202039.jpg (191KB, 1856x484px) Image search:
[Google]
191KB, 1856x484px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model GT-S7580 Camera Software S7580XXUBNH2 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:08:07 20:20:38 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/2.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 50 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 3.54 mm Comment User comments Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2560 Image Height 1920 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
favorite photo from christmas
Photo editing
I am offering photo editing services 2015-12-27 08:02:48 Post No.2730096
[Report] Image search: [Google]
I am offering photo editing services 2015-12-27 08:02:48 Post No.2730096
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: hilary_before_and_after.png (1MB, 2448x1044px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2448x1044px
I am offering photo editing services
Photo editing
2015-12-27 08:02:48
Post No. 2730096
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hi all, I just launched this posting on fiverr.
Check it out if you need any professional photoshop work done!
https://www.fiverr.com/ultimatephoto/professionally-retouch-and-edit-your-photo-bestdeal
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2730096
You say that like it's a difficult skill to learn or apply. Good luck making money
>>
>>2730096
you've made Mrs. Clinton look pretty weird
>>
>>2730155
Yeah. How do we know she is Satan if you 'shop the fuck out of her?
File: megamind_no_you_can__t_by_socalchic-d3fm4ha.jpg (310KB, 2176x1344px) Image search:
[Google]
310KB, 2176x1344px
hi /b/ i need help photoshop could do a montage of face of mauricio macri with the graphic of poster and slogan where is megamind and the same color scheme . PLEASE /B/ HELP ME
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
Need advice.
I'd like to buy this zeiss lens for my BMPCC (because it's zeiss and its cheap af) but it looks delaminated. Will this affect the picture? And if so how? Thanks
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 450 Scene Capture Type Standard
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2729223
fuck off, post in the gear thread.
>>
The "pro tessar" is not a complete
lens. It is designed to work with the zeiss contaflex camera.
The camera body contains the shutter and rear lens elements. The lens you have posted is one of a series of different front elements designed to give a variety of focal lengths.
It will not work on your
camera unless you find a way to take the rear lenses out of a contaflex and mount them.
>>
>>2729223
Good call.
Guys,
I need your help.
I could get this fuji x20 for quite cheap.
the thing is , the trigger has gone missing.
this looks super fixable , but I want another opinion.
I looked at wire triggers and they seem to insert relativley far into the hole and physicaly push down in order to trigger the camera.
I could 3d print something that would work similar.
are any x20 owners here that could give me their opinion ?
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Look up "soft release", it's a small button that just screws in.
>>
>>2730361
...no, an overtightened one is most likely what caused this damage in the first place. The shutter button is broken off, though the camera can still be triggered if you poke something thin in the hole and tap the microswitch that the shutter button is supposed to reach.
I haven't figured out an easy fix for this yet, my X10 suffered the same fate. It's easy to get the camera to fire still, but a permanent rigging that I dont have to hold in place? No clue.
>>
>>2730372
can u send me a nude lol
File: IMG_8417-2.jpg (361KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
361KB, 1000x663px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Feldspath Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:27 14:20:35 Exposure Time 1/125 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 663 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
16 Posts / 10 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_8448-2.jpg (103KB, 1000x575px) Image search:
[Google]
103KB, 1000x575px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Feldspath Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:27 15:11:06 Exposure Time 1/125 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 575 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_8454-2.jpg (100KB, 1000x624px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 1000x624px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Feldspath Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:27 15:14:52 Exposure Time 1/125 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 624 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_8466-2.jpg (217KB, 1000x637px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 1000x637px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer Feldspath Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:27 15:18:14 Exposure Time 1/125 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 637 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
File: e3e57aca-d39a-4d18-9027-89f1f8f8b179..jpg (506KB, 1440x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
506KB, 1440x1080px
hey guys Im having an issue between keeping my wx350 (picture) or buying a rx100 I or an a5000.
the wx350 suffers alot by the small image sensor in low light. this was the best image I took at the max ISO 3000 or so and it doesn't have manual anything. although I think in light settings it works haven't tried out doors yet. is it better to take the rx100 with its portability as an everyday Carey, the A5000 with its huge sensor but lack of mobility (and it comes with a poor lens in comparison towards the rx as someone told me) or keep the wx
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-WX350 Camera Software DSC-WX350 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:01:25 04:04:00 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 3200 Brightness -6.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1440 Image Height 1080 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
30 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
File: e5574b50-1615-44c8-9159-1d43ad434f40..jpg (517KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
517KB, 1920x1080px
Good lighting
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-WX350 Camera Software DSC-WX350 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:01:14 18:53:17 Exposure Time 1/6 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Brightness -1.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: kermett.jpg (76KB, 557x742px) Image search:
[Google]
76KB, 557x742px
>>2728746
>haven't tried out doors yet
>>
File: c4ac7bac-d7a7-42a3-b0b0-453616b4ad52..jpg (541KB, 1440x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
541KB, 1440x1080px
>>2728967
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-WX350 Camera Software DSC-WX350 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:01:25 13:56:36 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness 7.7 EV Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1440 Image Height 1080 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation High Sharpness Normal
File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx) Image search:
[Google]
0B, 0x0pxpx
I'm not sure if this is the right place to go, but I need a little help.
I photographed my grandmother's dog, long story short the photo is under exposed and she wants it framed.
Can you guys help me out by fixing the photo up? I would but my monitor is dying out and the colors aren't so good. [img]http://i.imgur.com/0lP4E36.jpg[/img]
9 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
I goofed with the link.
http://i.imgur.com/0lP4E36.jpg
>>
Yeah OP I can do this, it's easily fixable. How do you want it done? Just bump up the exposure or anything else?
>>
>>2730090
Simply fix it in every way. Things like exposure and noise reduction.
File: Screenshot_2015-12-25-18-48-11-1.png (875KB, 1440x964px) Image search:
[Google]
875KB, 1440x964px
Good evening. I just went out and purchased a Nikon D3300. I was hoping someone could direct me to a good website or book so I can use it to its full potential and really get to know my new camera. Thank you. Pic is the first picture taken with it.
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2729948
the manual.
>>
Manual is a good start. Ken Rockwell's website should be treated as God's word for about a month or two (that's with heavy reading), but after that, browse /p/ and you'll learn what to disregard on his website, because deep down he's a little fuck. Enjoy your camera!
>>
>>2729983
Assuming this is sarcasm. If not - please don't follow this.
First you want to start with the basics of lighting, aperture, shutter speed, etc. This is mostly all googleable but there's bunches of decent books on amazon (just search photography) if you want.
Once you get past the basics, you're basically going to want to focus more on the art side of things. For the love of God, avoid large amounts of /p/ browsing, it'll leave you with a completely warped and likely gear-fagged/nitpicking outlook. There isn't a single source to learn this, nor can it be really "taught". Do things like look at books of Renaissance paintings to get an idea of composition and light or google around/go to the library for books of famous photographs and see which ones you like and try figure out why you like them. Don't worry about creating your own unique style, just do what looks good to you.
File: A5100_Product_Black-02-12001_zpsbbb3ac7b.jpg (339KB, 700x367px) Image search:
[Google]
339KB, 700x367px
How the hell did you decide on your first camera? The more research I do the more options become available and it gets harder to choose, I've found a good deal on the ar5100 and I think I'll pull the trigger, if my main sues are sport, landscape and city shots is this a good purchase?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D800E Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Photographer TAKESHI HIRAYAMA Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 978 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 105 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1200 Image Height 801 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:08:18 08:31:24 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 700 Image Height 367 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
26 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2729817
Gear thread.
>>
first considered a nikon d3300
then looked around and decided on a pentax k3
glad i did. way lighter than a buddys canon i tried and much better body shape/form
like the dials much better than nikon/canons and it was on sale with a 50mm 1.8
>>
File: Edited-0308.jpg (2MB, 4896x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4896x3264px
>>2729817
I got really drunk, and a few days later a Fuji X-T10 arrived at my doorstep.
Drunk me made a good decision.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T10 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:10:21 22:11:47 Exposure Time 0.6 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -10.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
File: 12415669_10153287893768372_2066173654_o-1.jpg (145KB, 2048x1365px) Image search:
[Google]
145KB, 2048x1365px
Hey /p/
Managed to witness and capture the Aurora Borealis on Christmas morning. I'm a very amateur photographer and did my best to capture the lights but they were very faint and the light pollution was pretty crippling (I was in the middle of Reykjavik). How can I enhance the photos I did capture?
TL;DR How do I improve these pictures of the Northern Lights?
Retaking the pictures on another date isn't an option.
Cheers!
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
OP here. This is a heavily compressed version of the photo I captured...
>>
shameless self bump
>>
>>2729721
Get out from the fucking city
Get a much faster lens
Get a camera that can crank the ISO more
Shoot RAWdawg so you can fix it in post
I've never seen the AB myself so idk how fast it "moves" around. If it doesnt move very fast take longer exposures
This stuff should be obvious to you anon, are you just starting photography?
File: 8043195695_b009b1c4a5.jpg (111KB, 500x333px) Image search:
[Google]
111KB, 500x333px
Hey /p/, I got a question.
What kind of cameras do professionals use to shoot photos? DSLR, point-and-shoot, or mirrorless?
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
All three.
DSLR's are most common.
>>
All three. DSLRs are more common because they're easier to build a system around.
I.E. you're doing a wedding and you want a bunch of remote flashes, to do it well you pretty much gotta go for a DSLR.
Many pros lately are switching to
>Do I need to handle heavy lenses? Am I going to be comfortable?
DSLR
>Heavy equipment isn't necessary? I'm on a tight schedule with a lot of space to travel?
Mirrorless
P&S are tricky. Many pros like them for some peculiar work, but they're niche cameras for niche works, when it comes to pro stuff. You could, say, do a quick fashion shoot in a very claustrophobic setting with an RX100 fitting where no DSLR ever could. Stuff like that.
>>
The one that is with them. Except m4/3 and Pantex lol
File: canon eos rebel t5i.jpg (41KB, 675x450px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 675x450px
so this is my camera. it isn't waterproof.
but I'd still like to take it out in the rain.
any recommendations other than purchasing an expensive water proof case? cheap tricks? if not, no worries.
20 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2727982
Just take it out in the rain. You'll be fine. once you come back in, let it dry out really well before putting it away.
>>
File: eyebrows.gif (1MB, 200x200px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 200x200px
>>2727984
are you SURE that wont break my camera?
>>
take an umbrella lol