Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 474. page

use bridge first

>>2777231
my preferred combo is a total commander + irfan view, I haven't found anything faster than this yet

>>2777231
It won't matter what you do with your photos, cause youre not famous
like me

>>2775479
ok

>>2775479
>thinking that more megapixels=better photo
>not knowing that they already have 100mp sensors but theyre shit

ya read these facts from the onion?

File: you've been trashed son.jpg (31KB, 352x450px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 352x450px

>>2775488
It's just crazy how bad the fab tech is for camera sensors

It's even more crazy with how expensive it is.

They're literally FIVE process shrinks behind everyone else as I understand.

We're on fucking 14nm in the rest of the world, cameras are on fucking 90nm.

>>2775491
Let me phrase this a way you understand, since you don't understand lithography.

14nm (Intel processors) is 5 stops better than 90nm (Camera Sensors)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	352
Image Height	450

File: 220px-Hernán_Cortés,_Museo_de_América.jpg (16KB, 220x336px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 220x336px

>poor indio hobbies
lol

Cortés did nothing wrong.

>>2777376
>Cortes
>Southamerica

>>2777361
>One of them peed on his wounds to cure him.
My sides

>>2772669
Because if you're looking at my sharpness and fine detail at 100% then you aren't looking at my photo.

>>2772674

?

explain please

>>2772677
?
I just did.

File: IMG_7008.jpg (2MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x3000px

Last bump I have.
Friends bike he bought not long ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SX60 HS
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	3.80 - 247.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:16 17:58:02
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Red-Eye Reduce
Focal Length	3.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Tv-Priority
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Red-Eye Reduction (On)
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	0.610 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	192
Image Number	107-7008

File: IMG_4226.jpg (1MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4608x3456px

>>2777755
Sorry about shit size. Forgot to reimage. Go ahead and complain and i'll pretend like I care.
Sooorrryyyy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot SX60 HS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:21 12:44:44
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	105.55 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2768724
already a car thread

>>2777644
that has to be the ugliest picture i have ever seen

andy worhol was trash when he was alive and he's still trash today

why the fuck do you need to show 4 copies of the save object, all edited like shit, looks like you have zero idea how to edit.

just because high school girls follow you on Instagram doesn't mean you actually have skill.

And If you're so fucking smart why can't you even follow the rules on this board?

>>2777646
You're just babbling because you can't comprehend the deepeeating behind this picture.

>the asthmatic of nature
very poetic, so you've got that going for you too.

>>2776130
Powered by RICOH PENTAX CORPORATION LTD.

Why don't you own a A7Rii /p/? Are you just subhuman?

Still haven't gotten an answer as to whether it's worth purchasing the MK III Canon now, or waiting for the MK IV which is supposedly due sometime this year.

>>2775224
If you want us to look at your photos, respect us enough to post them here, at less than 1MB in size.

>>2775224
1000x on the longest side, please read the stick

>>2775245
Of course thats no Problem :) how do i get them smaler? :)

File: 1424294638387.jpg (1000KB, 1676x2981px) Image search: [Google]

1000KB, 1676x2981px

>>2771517
do you have a multimeter ?
wire it in parallel to measure voltage and measure when it drops past the cutoff of your load
to measure amperage , wire it in series

but thats the cheapest way to do it unless you want to drop mad dosh on a prophoto one

>>2771517
if it would even work, you will need a DC to AC converter, once it is all hooked up you can probably expect 10-50 strobes depending on your lights draw.

Q1 - trial and error

Q2 - Profoto makes a decent battery pack that will give you 150 strobes at full power, using their 600w monoblocks, it has a regular AC out so you can use any lights but results may very.
Dynalite makes a good kit for their lights, I almost bought into their system, it is quite nice and compact.
Speedotron has an ancient system that you could probably pick up for nothing, you will need to rebuild their NI-CAD batteries (battery specialists can still do this) and you get about 25 strobes at 300 wat seconds

Battery capacity in Ah (amp-hours) divided by the current draw of the load. In practice it will be about 30% worse than the calculation. If there isn't any Ah rating on the product you could open it to check the battery itself, or just test it.

>>2777338
>Do you consider a photographer if she / he use a smartphone to take the photo?
No
>What exactly defines a photographer?
Having a Wikipedia page
>Is camera that he uses or passion?
Money
>Does matters if you use automatic or a pro one?
Pro because of above
>Thanks!
I always like to help out the poor and unknown, by ridiculing them and reminding them how famous I am.

>>2777350
fuck off you're not the real jake olson

>>2777351
dont listen to him, hes a fucking nobody
I have a Wikipedia

>>2770236
lara jade makes amazing photos for how utterly clueless about all the technical aspects she is and probably her assistants do most of the planning for her.

joey has a unique style tho

>>2770237
>lara jade makes amazing photos for how utterly clueless about all the technical aspects she is a
kinda goes to show how unimportant the technical stuff can be compared to having a vision
>probably her assistants do most of the planning for her
That's true of basically everyone major so I can't really hold that against her.

>>2770239
Oh, admittedly being in the right place at the right time and being hot doesn't hurt her either...but yeah.

>>2775411
Starting to get*
woops

>>2775416
Yup, that's the reason of the name I guessed too after reading the short autobiography he wrote for the book
He's quite the interesting guy, and I discovered lots of pictures in the book that I had never seen before
There are some really amazing pictures in it, also you can see a bit better how great he is in the darkroom, he sometimes colours some very small bits of the images, that you may not even catch right away, but as soon as you start really looking you can see the yellow sepia of the light coming out of a window, or the colours on the united states flag
Great read, great book, I recommend it while it's still being printed and affordable

File: 511u1ATUyxL.jpg (41KB, 428x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 428x500px

>>2775421
Looks interesting, I like the thematic and the pictures of some of those guys, I'll take a look at it !

I also got this one, it's really amazing, I love the pictures in it, how Kenna takes the time out of his pictures, the great composition and sometimes minimalist aspect, it's really great, even his early 35mm work is really inspiring

File: 03560006.jpg (4MB, 2079x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2079x2048px

Ill post a few from that roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2079
Image Height	2048

File: 03560004.jpg (4MB, 2079x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2079x2048px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2079
Image Height	2048

>>2771415
Unless you're posting the whole roll, this doesn't deserve it's own thread.
But to answer your question, it's more likely you don't know how to use a light meter.
If you just pointed it at that scene, the brightness of the highlights would definitely have thrown off the reading.
You should meter for what you want correctly exposed., or if that's too complicated for you, for the shadows, in most scenes when shooting negative film.

https://d1wst0behutosd.cloudfront.net/videos/7679906.og2.mp4?Expires=1455994411&Signature=bcSY5gxWm9n492EigTAmkm~sj~p-bp1Mo9vL6DvmflxIRX93AW3XLm0pCLs1p0kcVt9vi-eOiASjs2iiNCJVgAWpwfZZyPdpgps~Zdt9uNlbIIW~adTWLdz2GLoNZEChVng4WKm9QS8epHdRAjf5887QOo1CXBbf~VZQrOIxrrT42wLuduz6iwrsdRQAkIl81IzUeHzPcHds2K-ks-JhU2E02K0N2t7D89LznZxHeVKhYDkc5nqn~HPXCGNj0mP7tcQtDIqAbqAGUFYDThwMT3iceoIJPRl6z9zRlyzKD0h4e1tm78BEWhBQ-OgPSQBkG9FmTz2uIveYDNqiaaszUg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJJ6WELAPEP47UKWQ

pls guys

>>2773689
How the fug do you destroy a shutter while inserting a roll of film?

Get a new camera. Shutter problems are never easy to repair and letting a professional repair it would cost more than the camera's worth.
You could always screw off the bottom and see if something's wrong. Maybe it's a simple fix. Probably not though.