Hi everyone! I've a question for you: Do you consider a

>>2777338
>Do you consider a photographer if she / he use a smartphone to take the photo?
No
>What exactly defines a photographer?
Having a Wikipedia page
>Is camera that he uses or passion?
Money
>Does matters if you use automatic or a pro one?
Pro because of above
>Thanks!
I always like to help out the poor and unknown, by ridiculing them and reminding them how famous I am.

>>2777350
fuck off you're not the real jake olson

>>2777351
dont listen to him, hes a fucking nobody
I have a Wikipedia

>>2777338
>Do you consider a photographer if she / he use a smartphone to take the photo?
Sure, If they're paying attention to composition and overcoming the limited ability of the camera then yeah.
This is a much easier question if you can change aperture/shutter speed/iso.

File: 1451439880614.jpg (18KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 499x499px

>>2777373
>This is a much easier question if you can change aperture/shutter speed/iso.

Talking about missing the forest for the trees.