[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 480. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: ff.jpg (215KB, 931x609px) Image search: [Google]
ff.jpg
215KB, 931x609px
Do you think this camera will be as good as let's say 5DMkIII?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width931
Image Height609
155 posts and 12 images submitted.
>>
>>2764448
Who cares, sony will release a new A7 which will make these hunks of metal obsolete.
>>
>>2764448
It will probably be a lot better in some ways, and a lot worse in others. It will depend on your usage, your lens budget, your needs, etc. At will almost assuredly have better raw image quality.
>>
File: I-want-to-believe-poster.jpg (41KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]
I-want-to-believe-poster.jpg
41KB, 600x750px
>>2764448
Pentax has been feeding you with "FF soon! So very soon!" for years now, and you idiots still keep falling for it.

Hell, even if they do finally release a FF camera, it will have no lens system to speak of, unless you're one of those hipsters who put banged-up old takumars on a multi-thousand dollar camera and call it art.

File: 3.jpg (322KB, 1200x787px) Image search: [Google]
3.jpg
322KB, 1200x787px
Visited an odd part of my polish hometown - a small area which somehow avoided progressing in time past WW2
29 posts and 15 images submitted.
>>
File: 1.jpg (388KB, 1200x718px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
388KB, 1200x718px
An area of poor, small houses clumped together, surrounded by contemporary districts
>>
File: 6.jpg (266KB, 1000x648px) Image search: [Google]
6.jpg
266KB, 1000x648px
A maze of narrow dirt "streets", each one with a proper name and probably over a century of history behind them.
>>
File: 2.jpg (452KB, 1200x776px) Image search: [Google]
2.jpg
452KB, 1200x776px
Basically a scaled-down version of the infinite american suburbs, each plot of land tightly packed with sheds, gardens or fruit trees. Or rubbish, mostly, these days.

"Although taking, sharing, and viewing photographs has become second nature for many of us, our regular engagement with images does not necessarily make us visually literate. This course aims to address the gap between seeing and truly understanding photographs by introducing a diversity of ideas, approaches, and technologies that inform their making. In this course you will look closely at photographs from the collection of The Museum of Modern Art and hear a variety of perspectives on what a photograph is and the ways that photography has been used throughout its nearly 180 year history: as a means of artistic expression, as a tool for science and exploration; as an instrument of documentation; to tell stories and record histories; and as a mode of communication and critique in our ever increasingly visual culture."


https://www.coursera.org/learn/photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGreenshot
Image-Specific Properties:
23 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2767364
Is this a free course? What's the price if not?
>>
>>2767367
$50 to get a certificate that I guess might be able to get you a cup of coffee with a $1.50...free without the certificate.
>>
>>2767367
Nope it's free, you just have to sign up for coursera.org. If you want a certificate at the end (???) it's $50, but otherwise, free.

I highly recommend everyone here participate in this, it's fantastic knowledge that can really help anyone interested in photography.

It's about photos, expression, and art, rather than gear, the manual, or MTF charts.

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
>2016
>APS-C
http://www.techtoyreviews.com/alleged-canon-80d-specifications-images-leaked/
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>canon
>mirrorless
???
>>
>>2771776
>digital photography
>>
File: Untitled-127.jpg (17KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled-127.jpg
17KB, 640x480px
>18-135 with Power Zoom Adapter

What the fuck? I get the idea for video shooters, but making a video-centric accessory for a lens that'll be too slow for serious video work seems ridiculous to me. Anybody who'd actually want this thing would be much better off buying an actual camcorder instead of a ghetto-rigged DSLR setup.

File: 135mm.jpg (370KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
135mm.jpg
370KB, 1000x666px
Recent Photo Thread

old one hit image limit

>>2762331

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSony
Camera Modela6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:10 17:39:27
ISO Speed Rating100
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height666
313 posts and 151 images submitted.
>>
File: itwasallforthepaper.jpg (455KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
itwasallforthepaper.jpg
455KB, 1000x666px
>>2765656
and another

kinda feel like i botched the editing, new to using lightroom.
opinions?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSony
Camera Modela6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:10 17:51:32
ISO Speed Rating100
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height666
>>
>>2765664
yeah. too dark and yellow. and maybe super slightly back-focused
>>
File: flecs2.jpg (1MB, 801x1200px) Image search: [Google]
flecs2.jpg
1MB, 801x1200px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution150 dpi
Vertical Resolution150 dpi

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2318x1536px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1MB, 2318x1536px
show me your best self taken pics!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5100
Camera SoftwarePhotoshop Express 4.0.7.33
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)78 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:01:05 08:25:58
Exposure Time15 sec
F-Numberf/38.0
Exposure ProgramShutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating560
Exposure Bias1 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceTungsten
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length52.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2318
Image Height1536
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Every picture here is self taken.
>>
>>2772073
What a pathetic mess of a shot.
Is that really your best?
Time to look for a new hobby, m8.

File: 12273706223_c632ccba99_b.jpg (319KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]
12273706223_c632ccba99_b.jpg
319KB, 1024x681px
Hello guys, I have a Konica S Hexanon 48mm lens, rangefinder. The thing is the next...I found it a couple of days ago and I cant make it focus, like, its suppoused to merge the two images I get, but when I move the distance dial of the lens, nothing happens, it doesnt move nor focus. I can make the lens bigger (when I put it on 10m distance) and smaller (If I set it to shorter distances like 1m) but In the visor i dont notice any difference, it is suppoused to be like this or it is broken? Can it be fixed? Sorry for the fatal english.
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
The lens doesn't get bigger or smaller, it either moves closer to the film or further away (this is how it focuses). Are you saying that neither of the two images (if there are two, perhaps the mirror is broken) are moving to merge when you move the distance dial?
>>
>>2771626
Can't focus? must be a Fuji.

Focuses
Unrealiably
Just
Incapable
>>
>>2771629
The thing is that I have a fucked up english lol. Yes, it moves closer to the film or further away. It is a rangefinder, so the two images that I have to merge, they DONT merge, and they dont move neither...so I guess the lens is broken somehow? The shooter speed dial works fine (500 to 1 sec)

File: FB_IMG_1455721442166.jpg (84KB, 1296x960px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1455721442166.jpg
84KB, 1296x960px
Can someone identify the top two polaroids for me?
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
tan one is the spectra 1200i. One on the left is a 600 series

Spectra is decent
>>
Spectras are good so-long as it has all the controls on back.

File: 58788952.jpg (49KB, 570x745px) Image search: [Google]
58788952.jpg
49KB, 570x745px
How would one go about doing it? I've heard of photo agencies, but which ones?

For example, let's say I took a picture of a high profile celebrity walking their dog.. Where would, and how would I go about selling that photograph?

What's the process?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerKamecho
Image-Specific Properties:
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2771056
Email the Daily Mail and describe the photo and ask them if they pay for it.
Basically look for shitrag tabloids that post pointless celeb shite and contact them, offering your material.
>>
>>2771063

How about agencies though? A middleman that can do all the selling for me and then he/her/they get a cut of my profits.. Something like that.
>>
>>2771068

Bump for interest

File: sR0001415-2.jpg (1MB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]
sR0001415-2.jpg
1MB, 1200x900px
For the first time in a while I feel like I have enough pictures to make my own post. It was snowing out pretty hard in Boston today and then there was a really nice sunset, so I took a half day and took some pics walking around before going home to snowblow the driveway.

Some of these I like, some I'm not sure about, so let me know which ones fall into which category for you to help me pick the keepers.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4352
Image Height3264
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 01:28:08
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness1/2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height900
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
56 posts and 23 images submitted.
>>
File: sR0001417.jpg (2MB, 1200x993px) Image search: [Google]
sR0001417.jpg
2MB, 1200x993px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4352
Image Height3264
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 01:27:26
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness1/2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height993
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: sR0001433.jpg (763KB, 1200x897px) Image search: [Google]
sR0001433.jpg
763KB, 1200x897px
>shooting the back of peoples' heads
Yeah I know, but I liked the snow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3488
Image Height2608
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 01:28:48
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height897
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: sR0001443.jpg (1MB, 1200x897px) Image search: [Google]
sR0001443.jpg
1MB, 1200x897px
No snow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3488
Image Height2608
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 01:36:47
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Brightness2.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height897
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal

File: kankle01.jpg (521KB, 1000x653px) Image search: [Google]
kankle01.jpg
521KB, 1000x653px
What is the average/going rate for photo editing?

A friend of mine wants me to retouch some vintage slides he scanned.

Googling was all over the map and most of the sites were from 2010.

Halp.

Pic unrelated, but no-comply's are sexy.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:02:14 16:46:15
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height653
2 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
if its your friend why the fuck do you want him to pay you, he's your mate. just ask for a six pack of beers.

File: eyes-6283.jpg (3MB, 3396x2264px) Image search: [Google]
eyes-6283.jpg
3MB, 3396x2264px
Is there a way to check the CRI of a light source at home? I have a cheap ringlight that I'm curious about.

Pic related, taken with ringlight on.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
PhotographerTom van Kouwen
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:11 15:58:04
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
2 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
MY FUCKING OCD WHAT ARE YOU DOIING TO ME OP!!!!!

why all exif data are not showing up here on /p/ after I export a picture from photoshop?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelNEX-7
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:08:07 16:02:15
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Brightness2.3 EV
Exposure Bias-2 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length47.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
4 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2771631
idk this is weird

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerBertil Nilsson
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width7200
Image Height4800
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2015:02:23 19:44:25
Image Created2013:06:14 19:33:10
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height667
>>
>>2771633
>>
>>2771636
like here for example. does photoshop erase exif randomly?

File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1MB, 3264x2448px
whenever i fire the shutter release on this fed, the curtain stays open like this. does anyone know why?
10 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
most likely it's stuck like soviet cloth shutters tend to
>>
>>2771591
how would I go about fixing this? thanks in advance.
>>
I had a similar problem with my zorki. I cleaned the shutter with alcohol, regreased, released and manually pushed it back.

It's not the 100% scientific or detailed answer you're looking for, but it worked for me.

File: issues.jpg (462KB, 1600x1193px) Image search: [Google]
issues.jpg
462KB, 1600x1193px
so every time i shoot, and check my photos in camera i think to myself, thats a great pic. but when i throw it on the computer its almost always a huge dissapointment and have to spend ages attempting to edit it to look like what i was when i saw it on camera
1. edited
2.original
3.original on camera (mind the haze)
In camera the pic seems to "pop" more and the colours are different. (yes my screen is callibrated). why does it look so dull and flat when it goes onto my computer?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern866
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)15 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width800
Image Height530
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:17 13:13:49
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length10.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1600
Image Height1193
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
27 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
Are you shooting raw or jpeg?
>>
raw
>>
in-camera you are looking at the jpg preview that is imbedded into all raw files.
That jpg preview is subject to all of the filters your camera has active, as well as a few that get applied to the preview by the manufacturer just to make it look nice on the camera.
But extract that jpg preview and view it on a decent size screen and it will reveal just how shit it really is.
There will always be some previews that lok decent outside the camera, but generally a decent screen with a decent color depth will reveal how excessively over-contrasted, over-saturated, over-sharpened and heavily compressed the jpg preview is.

Also; if you cant just (in post) apply the camera specific curve, and hit auto-exposure for a generally decent image then there is something wrong with they way you shoot, or perceive what you think you are recording.
Pretty much everyone over processes the fuck out of everyhtig these days, so it can be difficult to correlate what a raw captures with all the 'popular' shit that is really just heavily saturated and crushed black distortion.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [470] [471] [472] [473] [474] [475] [476] [477] [478] [479] [480] [481] [482] [483] [484] [485] [486] [487] [488] [489] [490] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.