[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 478. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: exa-cmount-01.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
exa-cmount-01.jpg
29KB, 500x500px
Hello /p/,

I have a Nikon D3300 and also some old lenses for my Exakta (which sadly isnt working anymore). Is there a way to attach those old lenses to my DSLR?

I've found pic related:

http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Pro-Adapter-Exakta-Topcon/dp/B0095OLVJG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1455755145&sr=8-1&keywords=exakta+nikon

Can i expect good results with this adapter?

One reviewer linked to his flickr-account where he used said product:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/22164090@N03/sets/72157634732856051/

Looks good to me. What do you think?
11 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
it looks fine dude, there's no other way anyway
>>
From what I'm reading, it sounds like the results aren't very good. Not only does the (sadly necessary for infinity focus) lens element in the adapter affect contrast and sharpness, but it's also quite small and apparently means that most lenses are reduced to f/3.5 or less.

It's worth a shot, though, since it's decently cheap.
>>
Nikons aren't great for adapting lenses to. Get a Canon or m43 or Mirrorless.

File: lines (1 of 1)-7.jpg (264KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
lines (1 of 1)-7.jpg
264KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
48 posts and 30 images submitted.
>>
File: lines (1 of 1)-9.jpg (229KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
lines (1 of 1)-9.jpg
229KB, 1000x667px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
>>
File: lines (1 of 1)-11.jpg (263KB, 1000x699px) Image search: [Google]
lines (1 of 1)-11.jpg
263KB, 1000x699px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
>>
>>2769089
>>2769090
I love both of these! but there are little issues that you could fix- for instance, the first one is ever so slightly off center, and the shadow on the left doesnt serve much of a purpose. but the shadow from the ladder looks great!

The second one looks great, too- but theres an issue with the bottom bit being cropped off, and its off center too.

overall i love em! just little nitpicky things keeping them from bein gr8

File: 24663806099_9d7b6921d9_k.jpg (805KB, 1716x2048px) Image search: [Google]
24663806099_9d7b6921d9_k.jpg
805KB, 1716x2048px
Took a walk with the x100s today, pick a favourite or tell me why they're shit

1/10
96 posts and 13 images submitted.
>>
File: 24663792789_e7897f1ba0_k.jpg (869KB, 2048x1391px) Image search: [Google]
24663792789_e7897f1ba0_k.jpg
869KB, 2048x1391px
2/10
>>
File: 24400789794_74f805d781_k.jpg (695KB, 2048x1225px) Image search: [Google]
24400789794_74f805d781_k.jpg
695KB, 2048x1225px
3/10
>>
File: 24400838504_a8ca3f2e38_k.jpg (656KB, 2048x1162px) Image search: [Google]
24400838504_a8ca3f2e38_k.jpg
656KB, 2048x1162px
4/10

I have been trying to up my processing game for a long time, and while I've been learning a lot, really dramatic high-end looks have always eluded me. I saw Photoshop® pop up here a few days ago, and reached out to him about help. We've been talking back and forth through email, and he's been educating me, and helping me to break down one of the looks I've been trying to nail for a long time.

In exchange for his help, he only asked that post our results here for everyone to learn, so here we go.

Pic Related is the sample image I provided, and the end result.
81 posts and 18 images submitted.
>>
Here are the sample images I sent him for what I was trying to achieve.

These images in particular come from Gervin, who posts here occasionally, and his work can be found here
http://gervinongervin.tumblr.com/


And here is a link to the raw of the image we were working on .
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ztmvjk8d7iaacbh/_DSF5664.dng?dl=0
>>
FWIW, I much prefer the left image to the right one.
>>
Can you please explain how to achieve the effect in the right picture? Thanks.

File: tortoise-lori-big.jpg (138KB, 768x576px) Image search: [Google]
tortoise-lori-big.jpg
138KB, 768x576px
Loss of sharpness in a picture is caused 80% by physical factors, and 20% by a mixture of bad aperture and ISO.

You think you need a "steady hand", but it is more complicated:

* Your muscles need training to keep stable when holding the camera in odd positions.

* The weight of the camera needs to rest correctly on the left hand. Consider using your wrist, or the sniper position.

* The fingers of the right hand need to stabilize the camera house while handling the shutter button.

* The shutter button must be pressed with as little energy transfer as possible.

* Longer lenses must be stabilized by resting correctly on the fingers, which don't have to be 100% still but should not move the lens.

* You need to skillfully rest the face against different parts of the camera while using the viewfinder to create stabilization.

Once these steps have been completed, consider using quiet shutter release to reduce internal shaking. It'll enable you to hold the mirror up until a bit after the shutter is down. My own tests show that there is a difference in the outcome compared to a regular shutter release. Of course, this does not work with "rapid fire" unless your camera has a quiet rapid fire feature. Not all do.

Be like a turtoise.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Width768
Image Height576
46 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
A second topic in terms of sharpness: You really do not need to worry about slow shutter speeds. It is not necessary to match the minimum shutter speed to the focal length of your lens.

At 1/15th of a second, the shutter opens and closes so fast that you will only slightly be able to hear the opening and closing sound. It is so fast that your hands, assuming they do the stuff in the steps above, will not move fast enough to really affect the photo sharpness. This goes regardless of your lens speed.

At 1/30, the shutter moves so fast that the opening and closing sounds practically sound like one sound. At all faster speeds, the two sounds get closer and closer. At 1/60 or 1/125, you'll not be able to distinguish anything whatsoever.

Again, this goes no matter the lens speed. It's not a shutter problem if you get motion blur in the photo. It's how you handle the camera. As I have seen in countless real-life cases, this lack of properly handling the camera can actually result in the same kind of motion blur even at fast shutter speeds like 1/250 or 1/500! So, unless there's people in your photo, you can do so much more by becoming a proper slow-shutter hand held photographer because you'll be able to get around without lugging your shitty tripod around (unless you want long exposures and astrophotography, but street night photography handheld is no problem whatsoever).
>>
>>2767004
When cameras first started having rear screens and no view finders I thought it was an ifiotic idea. I can't keep my phone steady at arms length to take a photo.
>>
good info, OP

> mfw when I only use wlf

File: FB_IMG_1455085219312.jpg (154KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1455085219312.jpg
154KB, 960x960px
How's this for an HDR?
89 posts and 19 images submitted.
>>
Pretty terrible, but then 99% of all HDR is terrible.
>>
To much post work? Not realistic enough?
>>
very odd looking.

File: IMAG0460.jpg (1MB, 1520x2688px) Image search: [Google]
IMAG0460.jpg
1MB, 1520x2688px
quick question for the techy people, does it take longer to compress a large image for example 5 gb into 2 gb or would it take longer to compress 5 gb into say 4.5 gb now it might seem an obvious answer but for a piece of coursework at uni i had to time how long it took to compress a file into different file formats. (i have exaggerated numbers here for the sake of an example) but part of my project is to take a RAW image and render it down to a lossy format such as a gif or jpeg. (pic isnt related)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHTC
Camera ModelHTC One
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:10:14 16:26:16
Exposure Time651/200000 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating125
Lens Aperturef/2.0
Brightness4.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeOther
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length3.82 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1520
Image Height2688
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2773634
why that box is bleeding?
Period?
>>
Just time it? Use dcraw and one of the time commands powershell something like Measure-Command { .\do_something.ps1 } & unix/linux/bsd time ./do_something.sh
>>
Or ImageMagick

File: pentaxk1[1].jpg (56KB, 640x446px) Image search: [Google]
pentaxk1[1].jpg
56KB, 640x446px
Sup /p/. Heres your Pentax K-1 Full Frame in all its glory.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width500
Image Height446
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2016:02:13 10:14:50
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width640
Image Height446
362 posts and 58 images submitted.
>>
File: pentaxk1back[1].jpg (70KB, 500x405px) Image search: [Google]
pentaxk1back[1].jpg
70KB, 500x405px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width500
Image Height366
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2016:02:13 10:15:25
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width500
Image Height405
>>
File: pentaxk1side1[1].jpg (54KB, 397x492px) Image search: [Google]
pentaxk1side1[1].jpg
54KB, 397x492px
doesnt look too bad to be honest familia

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width500
Image Height530
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2016:02:13 10:15:34
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width397
Image Height492
>>
oh shit can I get one of the top

File: image.jpg (227KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
227KB, 960x720px
Hiked a few miles to take this photo, no editing whatsoever and no effects. Thoughts? Can't tell if it's worth adding to my portfolio

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width960
Image Height720
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
It's an unexciting photo of mountains with poor composition in standard lighting with no major focal point. There is nothing that keeps me wanting to look at the photo for longer than a few seconds.
>>
The journey is better than the pictures. Nothing stands out or pulls me in. Beyond sharing to social media or with friends I wouldn't use it where.
>>
*anywhere

File: 20151130_165811.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]
20151130_165811.jpg
2MB, 5312x2988px
So I made some, ok 2, pictures when I was bored and want to know what you guys think about them. I don't like them that much, but some friends say they are not that bad.
So tell me what you think ^-^
~M.E.Lon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelSM-G900F
Camera SoftwareG900FXXU1BOJ1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:11:30 16:58:10
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Metering ModeAverage
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5312
Image Height2988
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeNight Scene
Unique Image IDF16QLHF01GB_
4 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2773306
It's not good. Sunsets are baby's first photograph sort of thing. Composition is totally lacking. Image is very blurry, lacking in sharpness. There is no subject.
>>
File: 1455931730024copy.jpg (3MB, 3780x2835px) Image search: [Google]
1455931730024copy.jpg
3MB, 3780x2835px
Staighten the horizon
Crop for better composition
sharpen
and get more out of the histogram
this is some of the things you could do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSAMSUNG
Camera ModelSM-G900F
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:20 16:23:41
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Metering ModeAverage
Focal Length4.80 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3780
Image Height2835
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeNight Scene
>>
still very blurry ...

File: Norway_ondes_boreales.jpg (1MB, 2048x1367px) Image search: [Google]
Norway_ondes_boreales.jpg
1MB, 2048x1367px
elo this is first post on 4chan so pls b kind
sry for english im PL
9 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2771134
Is this really your image OP? I saw it very recently on some photography subreddit, but it could very well be yours
>>
>>2771134
It's a very nice photo. However, the reflection in the water is a bit too saturated for me. Maybe if you can make it a bit natural, would be way better.
>>
>>2771134
if you really took that, make a trip and post more. Really good photo anon, a tad too vibrant at the bottom but that's okay.

File: DSC02960-8.jpg (853KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
DSC02960-8.jpg
853KB, 1000x666px
Hey /p/

I was wondering why you guys do photography. I feel like a lot of people here have different reasons to do so.

My own personal reason is that taking photos in general makes me feel good, it gets my out of my desk chair.
I used to be some random gamer weeb, but photography got me out of that. It makes me get off my lazy ass every once in a while.
Also, whenever I take a photo I really really like, I get a warm feeling on the inside.

This is my reason. Why do you enjoy/do photography?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelSLT-A58
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:15 22:41:04
Exposure Time8 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/22.0
Brightness-2.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceShade
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
56 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
>>2770714
Same here, OP. Also, as a challenge, I do some fashion shoots from time to time. Planning, set design, lighting, post production and that feel when you just can't fuck up... I like it.
>>
Personally I enjoy it because being out in nature gives a great feeling. Instead of being a couch potato, I'm now out in nature more.
>>
>>2770714
To document the things I do and the places I go.

When I get some beautiful photos alomg the way, all the better

File: IMG_0663.jpg (83KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0663.jpg
83KB, 1000x667px
went for a walk today
all critique very welcome
42 posts and 26 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_0668.jpg (117KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0668.jpg
117KB, 1000x666px
2
>>
File: IMG_0680.jpg (154KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0680.jpg
154KB, 1000x667px
3
>>
File: IMG_0690.jpg (140KB, 1000x623px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0690.jpg
140KB, 1000x623px
4

File: image.jpg (454KB, 971x971px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
454KB, 971x971px
Share your favourite vintage photos. Something that's capable of reviving the fragment of beauty of a forgotten time. Black and white is acceptable, but colour is more captivating.

This is Porsche 911 manufacturing in Stuttgart, Germany, in late sixties/early 70s. The sunlight really brings something to this shot that is devoid in many other warehouse/manufacturing shots.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width971
Image Height971
Scene Capture TypeStandard
11 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: image.jpg (227KB, 660x835px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
227KB, 660x835px
The jaguar e-type assembly line in Coventry, England, early 70s.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width660
Image Height835
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: 1349402389042.jpg (60KB, 998x800px) Image search: [Google]
1349402389042.jpg
60KB, 998x800px
ill match a few car shots op
>>
File: ddddddddddddd.jpg (254KB, 1280x991px) Image search: [Google]
ddddddddddddd.jpg
254KB, 1280x991px

File: GR003081.jpg (743KB, 1100x762px) Image search: [Google]
GR003081.jpg
743KB, 1100x762px
Well i got bored of Taking pictures of Houses in the Australian suburbs so i figured i'd drive across Australia and do the exact same thing for Roadhouses.
Fear not the location and subjects may have changed but the VSCO usage and white borders haven't, if anything VSCO usage is at an all time high.
This is life on the road across the Nullarbor, WA to VIC.
Oh and my GRII broke so I'm back to using just the GR

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height662
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
Image Created2016:02:03 19:52:26
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness7.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1100
Image Height762
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
81 posts and 39 images submitted.
>>
File: GR003091.jpg (623KB, 1100x599px) Image search: [Google]
GR003091.jpg
623KB, 1100x599px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height499
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
Image Created2016:02:03 19:58:12
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness10.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1100
Image Height599
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: GR003099.jpg (694KB, 1100x762px) Image search: [Google]
GR003099.jpg
694KB, 1100x762px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height662
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
Image Created2016:02:03 19:59:18
Exposure Time1/1500 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness10 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1100
Image Height762
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: GR003118.jpg (1MB, 1100x1036px) Image search: [Google]
GR003118.jpg
1MB, 1100x1036px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1000
Image Height936
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution500 dpi
Vertical Resolution500 dpi
Image Created2016:02:03 20:00:28
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Brightness9.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1100
Image Height1036
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [468] [469] [470] [471] [472] [473] [474] [475] [476] [477] [478] [479] [480] [481] [482] [483] [484] [485] [486] [487] [488] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.