Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 435. page

File: abstract-1.jpg (909KB, 5496x3670px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 5496x3670px

2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/249 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	39.00 mm
Image Width	5496
Image Height	3670

File: idkmaine-1.jpg (878KB, 3670x5496px) Image search: [Google]

878KB, 3670x5496px

3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/639 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Image Width	5496
Image Height	3670

>>2822656
Le abstract

so they can sell posters of the art and shit, and you can't take a photo of the artwork, then print your own posters and shit you fucking retard

>>2822119
last time you posted this, she was your wife

>>2822122
This anon is right, i remember the same thing.
Also, dubs of truth

>>2821094
> I've been looking for the Nikon d3300, but the fact that it's only 11 af points got me triggered
So I guess you're going to pay more to get more...? Get a Nikon D7200 or D750?

Or buy a Sony, Pentax, Panasonic, Fuji, Olympus or whatever has sufficiently good AF for you.

> I've been looking for the Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC Lens so... Any thoughts?
It is a cheap zoom lens. You either require both cheap and extreme zoom, or you probably don't want that lens and will instead get something faster and/or sharper.

> I don't consider myself as a n00b, but also not a professional
If you have enough motivation to understand a bunch of buttons and wheels, you can use the best of cameras. So that information is almost irrelevant.

The question is pretty much how much you're willing to spend and carry. If it's a lot for either, get high-end glass and high-end cameras. If not, adapt accordingly.

It is probably most often wise to buy more expensive glass and cheaper bodies, but in some cases it might also be the other way around. IDK what you need...

>>2821094
Gear thread.
Also, get a K-50 if you want a better camera for the same money. And don't bother with superzoom lenses, they are shit without exceptions. Just use the usual kit lens and whatever kit telezoom you can get in a bundle.

>>2821094
You're better off with the 2 kit lens for this guy.
When I bought my d3200, it came with a 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and 55-200mm f/4-5.6.
I mean, they ARE cheap lenses but, as the other anon said, a superzoom would be even crappier and you would be wasting your money.
I'd buy a faster lens like the Nikkor prime 35mm(nifty fifty equvalent) 1.8G instead. They're a nice lens for $200.
I have a d610 with better lenses but my knockaround combo is that d3200/35mm.
My only LITTLE regret is that d3200 which has the anti-aliasing filter unlike the d3300. Anti-aliasing filter = bad IMO.

Which is the most affordable film right now? I mean the one you can go to a shop and just buy. I've been using Fujicolor c200

>>2820365
That's such a regional-specific question. There's no point in asking that unless you provide more details. Last place I lived had a store that sold bulk rolled Kodak 200 stuff for $2/roll. Place I live now has a store that sell some Lomo c41 for $2.50 a roll.

File: IMG_9147.jpg (228KB, 550x800px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 550x800px

>>2819920
I am v. jelly of your Sensia.
Provia 400 is pretty amazing film for snapshitting as well.
Would love to shoot it in MF.
I hope your E100VS has held up better than mine though.
Pic related.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	550
Image Height	800

File: 25633785903_9a10cbb827_z.jpg (120KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 640x427px

Here is one more from OP, will post some more later!

File: 26170162741_6cce7246b8_k.jpg (338KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1024x684px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

I really want a fisheye now, those are cool shots. I work in abstract, so I reckon it would be a boon. What do you think?

Who cares?

File: 1363676666446.jpg (151KB, 1000x698px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1000x698px

>Bass appreciation thread

>>2828193
Obviously I care at least a little bit, which is why I created this thread. I'm probably not alone.

File: _MG_4337 [HDTV (1080)].jpg (86KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Photographer	unknown
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:29 21:47:46
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	43.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: _MG_4157 [HDTV (1080)].jpg (248KB, 1000x920px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1000x920px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Photographer	unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:29 21:41:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: _MG_4339 [HDTV (1080)].jpg (179KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1000x667px

aside from rule of thirds i know nothing about composition. I dont know much about a cameras capabilities aside from surface level stuff either. (i can shoot manual and get the gist of F/ AP. and ISO)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Photographer	unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:29 21:47:55
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Damn bro, 8 hours is a long-ass wedding

>since his wife-to-be is a graphic designer and would do it herself.
Run away and don't look back

>>2827571
>8 hours
that's extremely fucking long. No single person is going to be able to capture an 8 hour event, that's at minimum two people and thousands of dollars of gear + skilled labor, unless they're looking for mcdonalds quality.

>>2827497
A lense cap is not a photographic tool.
It doesn't aid your photography.
It will regularly impede your photography.
It's as much use to a photographer as the box the lense came in.
If you're carrying your camera for any reason beyond simply transporting it from one storage location to another, it has no useful function.

>>2827501
Doesnt protecting your lens from dirt, dust and scratches serve a useful photographic purpose?

You never have a cap on your lens?

I never quite understood his point, I mean I'm not a pro but what kind of shit are pros shooting where they immediately get to a job site and the 5 seconds (at most) it takes to get the lens cap and reversed hood off ruins the shoot?

>>2826869
resize and gear thread

>>2826869
Don't go for the GH4 if you care about low light, Ideally you should get an a7s2, but an a6300 could be closer to your budget - if you care about 120fps 1080p. Otherwise a7s

>>2826887
Thanks for your feedback,I didnt think about the A6300,I might check it out since its a lot cheaper than both A7's

The Canon Rebel would've done you better.

>>2826196
which one? The t3? t5? Or are you just making a generalization?

>>2826197
Jesus, relax. The t5i I guess...

>>2825700

>>2826125
I don't know where you are from, but try not to look as a foreigner (no sandals and socks), neither act like one of them (pointing at every think like you didn't saw a statue in your life).
Be extremely cautious on the metro, that's their nest.
The more people there are, the more likely there is one of them.
If someone gets close to you or "touchy", take distance.
But this is just general /adv/, I don't know why ask this here.

It doesn't matter if you look like a tourist or not just look AWARE. Don't put it down anywhere anyone can grab, keep hold of it, pocket it or piut it out of sight. If you have a bag put the arm strap under the table/chair leg or your leg through it, that kinda stuff. Don't let anyone invade your personal space. Just be vigilant basically.

I'm a white guy who lived in BCN for 4 years, never got robbed once but seen countless (maybe a 100?) thefts. Most i've seen have been bags (women) and name brand mobile phones (men and women). iPods, cameras, etc are also easy pickings.

>>2826120
>my body turns on so it's not outdated
Yeah, it's not like there are other functions of a camera body than it turning on...

An outdated focus system = lost shots.
Outdated metering system = incorrect exposures.
Outdated sensors and noise algorithms = grainy ugly shots, that can't be fixed in post without losing major detail since the camera lost too much before it ever made it to a computer.
Low resolution sensor = maybe picture looks fine at postcard size with you never doing any significant cropping. No way to circumvent this other than buying a better body.

Upgrading every single new camera is usually inefficient, but people who claim a 10 generation outdated piece of electronic hardware isn't deficient are just fucking delusional hipster faggots who are so talentless they don't care how bad their output is.

>>2826149

Beat me to it - one of the most retarded points.

I have the original Macintosh 128K from 1984. It can turn on, it's not outdated!! 100% Functional!

>>2826149
The point usually refers to the fact that it produced fantastic photos when it was new, and it produces the same photos now.

The D810 is a fantastic camera right now. In 10 years, there will be cameras that make it look like a rebel, but in reality, it will still be a fantastic camera.

you give a middle eastern man space clothes and put him behind an ocean with the debri of his space ship

>how do i take a good portrait?

>but i dont know how to use a camera, i cant take a picture right, and i cant figure out a background

>>2826024
You find a good subject, and find a setting that fits with what you're trying to say about them. You then find light that fits the mood of that statement, and arrange it in a way that is flattering to the subject (or unflattering, depending on your goal). You then use your people skills to coach an expression/pose from the person that matches all of the above.

There is no recipe. Being good at art is hard. You have to come up with a lot of it yourself.

>>2825767
If it's for blogging outside or recordingstuff like your picture I'd recommend a hotshoe microphone or a wired lavalier instead.

Hotshoe microphones are inherently cheaper, so at the same price you can get a better one, with the extra of being able to record several people with a simple setup and a slightly better noise isolation in windy days.

Wired lavaliers have the ibvious disadvantage but you can multiply the inputs just by adding a cheap 1 to 2 or 1 to 4 jack input adapter to your camera.

Also both systems are more reliable than a wireless lav. Only perk of wireless is long distance flexibility and freedom of movement, but even that can be fixed with a hotshoe wire and the hotshoe mic to move it around folowing the subject without moving the camera itself.

If not, then go to youtube, type "lok digitalrev what's in my camera bag" and buy the same system, but prepare your anus/wallet.

>>2826852
Sage and redirect to a fucking gear thread, ya dingus

I have a Rode VideoMic Pro. It goes in the hotshoe or you can put it on a boom.