Now that the dust has settled, can we just agree that this is a very bad photo?
>>2831576
>DUDE "REFUGEES"
Fuck this pathos bullshit.
How much that baby sell for?
What's the story here?
How do I achieve this look?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2831173
Grow a family
>>2831173
add +100 saturation
>>2831173
develop asbergers and take a selfie
Why is there no more cool stuff going on in /p/ like there used to be the previous years?
Why was this discontinued?
http://z-ine.tumblr.com/
And why is the 2015 photo book taking so long?
In case someone hasn't see the previous books they're these:
2014: http://www.blurb.com/b/6074398-p-2014
2013: http://www.blurb.com/b/5132777-p-2013-large
2012: http://www.blurb.com/b/4145886-p-photo-book-2-0-large
2011: http://www.blurb.com/b/3100411-a-photography-collection-from-the-internet-s-wild
I feel this kind of projects got the best out of us, and people who are beginning would be able to see the best from /p/ and try to improve instead of flushing pictures down the Recent Photos Thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2185 Image Height 2185 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2014:04:08 15:06:21 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 700 Image Height 700
>>2822400
/p/ is a meat grinder, and has ground up all the worthwhile people with fun ideas about the community. Now we're just a bunch of NPC zombies swaying back and forth in a dark room waiting for the next adventuring party to walk through the door to be accosted. We contribute nothing, we risk nothing, we create nothing but drool and rotten meat on the ground.
Hopefully someday soon, /p/ will realize that if you constantly abuse the people who are trying to help you, people stop trying to help you.
The zine was someone's passion project, rather than a community thing, so it was always destined for a short lifespan. You're more than welcome to start one up again. I would like to see the "Best of" monthly threads we used to have, but those are also notorious troll magnets.
The books always take four or five months, since we're all flakes.
I would like to see more challenges, but the guys who run them always pick banal topics out of pop photo or something. I would also like to see more fine art discussion, since i've seen some real roody poo pleb-ass shit posted in the last five or six weeks.
When the "community" is nothing but "this is shit" with no rhyme or reason and nobody posts their own work, people don't stay here very long, I imagine.
Hi /p
Where can i find photos of forests in winter shot on film not digital?
Google is giving me nothing, where else can i search for them?
Also post em if you have em
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 426 dpi Vertical Resolution 426 dpi Image Created 2012:12:16 21:46:01 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2833561
Why?
>>2833561
Learn to internet
>(insert film name) winter forest
>(insert film name) snow forest
>>2833568
so comfy, also im going to a forest soon.
These are three of my favorite of my most recent photos. The key problems I saw with 2 was the focus it is off nothing to be done now. However I really those 2 regardless.
Looking to get better, trash em.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5678 Image Height 4450 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 21:48:27 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 784
>>2833553
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5672 Image Height 4418 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 21:48:50 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 779
>>2833554
3/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3014 Image Height 1224 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 21:50:53 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 406
These are 35mm film pictures, shot on a Pentax MX with a Pentax SMC 50mm lens.
would any anons care to donate any of their own images that I could possibly use as album art for my music project?
>>2833205
post your shit so i can listen what crap will my art be plastered to. im assuming its shite.
It would be helpful if we knew what sort of music project
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Ver.1.02 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 38418 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 120 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:06:18 18:12:19 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/5.3 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 6400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected Focal Length 80.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Is the person getting paid in "experience and exposure"
how do i get lighting like this?
>>2833042
direct flash when it's almost night time
>>2833043
this
>mom get the camera lower
>no! don't point it down!
>don't yell at me Dylan!
>sorry mom
>just get lower
>you not the camera
>no mom you have to hold the shutter
>dylan you're not going to post this online are you?
>no mom it's just for my album
looks like somekind of a setup
I own a Nikon D3200 dslr camera. I've been thinking of buying some fisheye lens, and I can only afford up to 200 euros (max 250). So, yeah.. Can you suggest me some good ones for begginers, maybe give me some photo samples too?
Thanks
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 874 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 38 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4425 Image Height 3002 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:12:19 11:52:00 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 2200 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 695 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2832787
Zenitar 2.8, 16 mm Fisheye-Objektiv
Its about +-200 $ and worked pretty well for me.
It comes along with an moutadapter. Very nice lens. Buy it, thank me later.
>>2833063
Bought this with an adapter and it wouldn't focus to infinity on my D70. Also, it's barely a fisheye on a crop sensor. Pic related.
OP, fisheye lenses are gimmicky and you'll probably get bored of it super fast. That said the Samyang 8mm is probably the best bet in your price range.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D70s Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 822 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2007:01:07 16:12:03 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 432 Image Height 650 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2833063
not OP but thanks for this!
Street view screenshots thread?
here's where i took mine;
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@36.907332,-120.816856,70.32h,2.32p,1z
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:06 21:57:32
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@32.349456,-64.650892,-130.09h,17.53p,1.33z,0dKTNd3K2xZ8naivwh7S-g
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:06 22:20:46
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@-4.507773,-73.577209,103.65h,14.25p,1.66z
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:06 22:29:07
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@47.799981,13.039304,-69.49h,10.11p,0.67z
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:06 22:40:30
In terms of IQ, sharpness, dynamic range ect how far ahead are the latest crop of phone sensors away from the early full frame sensors??
Do you condenser some modern phone's as true tool worthy of making prints?
My opinion on this :
IQ isn't really the issue anymore, hasn't been for a while now. We can cram a good sensor and some okay glass into anything nowadays. And that'll get you decent prints in any reasonable conditions.
For me it all comes down to ergonomy, lens compatibility and battery life. And of course with lens compatibility you can go further in terms of creativity.
Full fledge cameras are still ahead in terms of extreme conditions management, but I think it's pretty much it.
>>2832602
>Full fledge cameras are still ahead in terms of extreme conditions management, but I think it's pretty much it.
autofocus, dynamic range, color rendition, focal lengths other than semi wide angle, low light capabilities, autofocus, viewfinders (and therefore stability) manual controls, raw image quality, lens quality (including corrections for aberrations and such)
Any technology that improves a 1/4" photo sensor will also improve a full frame or APS-C sensor.
Phones are certainly good enough for many things for most people, but it doesn't mean their capabilities are equal.
>>2832597
>In terms of IQ, sharpness, dynamic range ect how far ahead are the latest crop of phone sensors away from the early full frame sensors
Uh, there's no comparison. Early full frame sensor still blow the latest and greatest phones out of the water in every conceivable metric.
GO!!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi Image Created 2011:11:12 02:30:51 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 4000 Image Height 2240
>>2832526
jeez couldn't you wait for a boat or something. Anything to add a little inteterest
>>2832526
Criticising Gurskys work online is like watching an epic movie on you phone and not being impressed.
His work revolts around the concept of size and proportions and was meant to be looked at at 185,4 × 363,5 cm, not on your crappy screen. Standing in front of a Gursky print changes the picture dramatically.
>>2832526
eugh resize OP did you even read the sticky
>AIPP
Australian Institute of Professional Photographers
Is it worth joining these types of institutions? Or is it a rip off and full of faggots?
The AIPP for example costs $500 per year (if you are pro) plus a one off $100 signup fee or some bullshit.
Basically you get to use the logo on your website (as if that makes a difference) and some other useless stuff (like people can search for you through their website)..
I am however slightly interested in the mentoring program and being a part of a community that is actually full of successful professionals who are willing to give advice.. I do know that there is at least one extremely successful photographer in the AIPP but for all I know he runs it and makes a killer living off of morons that become members.
tl;dr: Is anyone a member of the AIPP or similar institution? Is it worth it? What are the pros and cons?
>inb4 I am accused of shilling for the AIPP
I am just genuinely curious whether becoming a member is worth it or not.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Picasa Photographer marcus Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 640
Simple straight forward answer. No.
I joined when I was a student, it was at a cheaper rate but I got nothing for joining or being a member.
>>2832493
>who are willing to give advice
Well here's some free advice; kill yourself
long story short im a NEET whos camera that my grandfather gave me broke due to getting in a car crash and my bag got fucked but i need to get a new one fast for a event coming up.
plus im really short on cash atm,is samsung WB1100F a good quality stater camera?
and if its not too much work for you what lens should i get??
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Version 1.7 Photographer Picasa Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2014:04:29 12:25:57 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2925 Image Height 2409 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Unique Image ID 0e6341e6659e53eaa57a558b618bd87e
>>2832482
tell us how much you got
also get a fucking job
>>2832486
i store near by me is selling them new for 60$
and i would but i have to take care of my disabled mother 24/7
>>2832486
i just realized i didn't actually answer your question, i have 70$
Sup /p/ I'm participating in a student gallery and hanging one of my pictures up. I need to buy a plexiglass and prematted frame for it. Now I want to print my image on a 13 x 19 luster print, what size frame should I get? My image is pretty square(because I fucked up a year ago) What do?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 918 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 51 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6016 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:05 23:26:14 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 34.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 1111 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Here is the image dimensions
That's not a standard frame size. Either cut a mat or crop your image to 12x16.
>>2832329
Idk if I can crop it. When filling out the application I said my print size was 13x19. Would it look bad if I go a size up? Sorry I'm just so new to this. I was kind thrown into this whole situation; I'm just a first year photography major.
Hi /p/,
Just started getting in to photography and my richfag parents bought me this set up. I'm a neet living on autismbux so it seems like a pretty good deal to me.
Also, is Ken Rockwell and Fro Knows Photo a good place to start learning?
You put no effort into this.
>>2832010
I'm not joking, this is legitimately true.
Just asking for some advice here.
>>2832013
I still don't believe you. You can be a journalist photog with a new piece of equipment trying to troll. Let me remind you we lived through numerous influx of sonyfags and fuji fanbois. Your troll-fu is weak. It's so weak, even watered down water has a stronger impact.
made me reply/10