[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 433. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: Screenshot_2016-04-10-22-13-19.jpg (299KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-04-10-22-13-19.jpg
299KB, 900x1600px
Anybody know who/what this is?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
6 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Instagram. It's pretty popular.
>>
>>2829436
I'm no expert, but it looks like a photograph.
>>
>>2829436
>myexterior

File: _MG_2431.jpg (2MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]
_MG_2431.jpg
2MB, 3888x2592px
Photo with mirroring

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 1000D
Lens Size18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.5
Serial Number1430304802
Lens NameEF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:03:13 16:07:13
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/1250 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length42.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3888
Image Height2592
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeAv-Priority
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationUnknown
ContrastUnknown
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeContinuous
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed192
Color Matrix33
6 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
their shit
>>
File: Cruise 09.jpg (440KB, 1000x635px) Image search: [Google]
Cruise 09.jpg
440KB, 1000x635px
hay

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: O7LPfc3.jpg (742KB, 3600x2400px) Image search: [Google]
O7LPfc3.jpg
742KB, 3600x2400px
Reflect

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
I haven't paid attention to photo stuff for the past 5 years

did anyone make an affordable full-frame digital rangefinder yet?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width500
Image Height375
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:03:29 10:22:53
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width500
Image Height375
46 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>2828511
Fuji X100 series or Fuji X-Pro series.
>>
>>2828521
>full frame

Oops, I forgot about that part. There's only APS-C as of right now. Only Leica does FF
>>
>>2828521
>>2828523
The X-E2s has a digital rangefinder in it as well and it's only $999 and comes in a kit, unlike the X-Pro2.

Tomorrow I'm attending a demonstration that could potentially turn out violent.
How do I best capture this?

Long lens or wide lens? Video or photo? Etc...
27 posts and 16 images submitted.
>>
>>2828057
24-70 and 70-200, ND filter not a bad idea if it's sunny since you want quite a thin depth of field so your subject doesn't just fade into the mass of protestors. I'd probably bring a mic too so you can video if needs be, but personally I'd concentrate on photo.

What's the protest by the way? If it's junior doctors or anti-austerity you've got no hope I'm afraid.
>>
>>2828061
Thank you for your advise!

>What's the protest by the way?
There are several political demonstrations at the same time, with very different opinions.

The main parties I will follow is the Nordic Resistance Movement and the Swedish Anti-Fascist Action movement.
The first is basically a party for Neo-Nazis, and the latter an extreme-left autonomous movement known for being pretty hostile and violent.

If I capture anything of interest I'll upload it here.
>>
>>2828065
Sounds like there's definite potential for a bit of madness there! Best of luck, and yeah remember to bring us the fruits of your labour!

File: [013374].jpg (296KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]
[013374].jpg
296KB, 1000x750px
New to /p/, completely forgot this board existed.

I have some neat photos from when I lived in the Canadian Arctic, anyone else have some good exotic locale photos?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SD780 IS
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2010:05:18 05:35:01
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/3.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.90 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
16 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: [006683].jpg (192KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]
[006683].jpg
192KB, 1000x750px
Photo 2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SD780 IS
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.2
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2011:02:13 15:39:22
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/3.2
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.90 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: [007307].jpg (178KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]
[007307].jpg
178KB, 1000x750px
Photo 3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot SD780 IS
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2011:08:04 11:07:44
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.8
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/5.8
Exposure Bias-0.7 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length17.90 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: [010662].jpg (139KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]
[010662].jpg
139KB, 1000x750px
Photo 4

File: Tree1.jpg (1MB, 1920x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Tree1.jpg
1MB, 1920x1920px
After a pretty bad injury I recieved while I was out in New York City on a photo trip, I've hardly been able to get out and do any landscape photos, because my ability to walk has been pretty hindered. And because much of my photography is done by myself, I've been afraid to go on a lengthy hike out of the fear my injury will flare up again, and I'll be stranded in an area without cell reception.

So last night I went on my first hike again. It was my first time visiting this small park in the hills of San Diego, so it was also a scouting session for further trips out there. I've only got a few photos because I'm pretty picky.

I'm basically just looking to see which one of these 4-5 photos is your favorite, and just looking for some constructive criticism. And if you could keep it objective with your criticism that would be great. I really just want to figure out which would be best to post on my Instagram.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 9.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:28 10:48:03
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Brightness-6.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
28 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
File: Cow feeding.jpg (3MB, 1281x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Cow feeding.jpg
3MB, 1281x1920px
>>2827027
Picture 2, cow feeding on some rolling hills

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 9.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)400 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:28 10:48:09
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Brightness9.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length400.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: Tree2.jpg (1MB, 1920x1281px) Image search: [Google]
Tree2.jpg
1MB, 1920x1281px
>>2827028
Picture 3, same tree that's seen in the OP

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 9.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)42 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:28 10:48:09
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Brightness-5.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length42.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: Hill.jpg (1MB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Hill.jpg
1MB, 1280x1920px
>>2827030
Then one last photo, least favorite. Just thought the clouds and grass looked nice together

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7R
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Camera Raw 9.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:28 10:48:12
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness9.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: Pentax-K-50-Weather-sealing.jpg (51KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]
Pentax-K-50-Weather-sealing.jpg
51KB, 450x450px
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.

Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dickwaving allowed! You have been warned!

I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!

And don't forget, be polite!

Previous thread: >>2822947
311 posts and 30 images submitted.
>>
File: fgyugfugfyufl.jpg (101KB, 2142x1205px) Image search: [Google]
fgyugfugfyufl.jpg
101KB, 2142x1205px
Hey guys! Retard here.

My parents generously gifted me a T5i with a macro lens because they know I like movies, but I'd like to take videos from a distance further than just .8 feet.

What do you recommend for a dumbass newbie film maker?

Wide-angle?

Telephoto?

Let me reiterate that I have no idea what I'm doing. (pic related)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePicasa
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2825705
Forget the macro "filters", those destroy your image quality.
Also what lens do you have specifically, just see what's written on it, below the front lens cap.
>>
>>2825706
M58?

efs 18-55mm image stabilizer MACRO 0.25/0.8ft

File: 27528_Nikon_1_J1_left.png (119KB, 700x595px) Image search: [Google]
27528_Nikon_1_J1_left.png
119KB, 700x595px
A few months ago, I was convinced on IRC to buy a mirrorless - specifically the Nikon 1 j1 (pic related). Being the naive person I was, I hadn't thought much of it, and have actually had a good experience with it for some time.

The problem I see, however, is that most "pros", or even people on /p/, are using a DSLR and not mirrorless like the one I have.

What are the real "pros" and "cons" to having a camera like mine, the Nikon 1 J1, as opposed to the cheap point-and-shoot cameras and DSLRs?
28 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2824305
Nothing
>>
To add, I don't even think buying a camera like this was worth it. I see people taking pictures from their iPhones, which look great.
>>
Shorter flange distance for adapting lenses.
Just not really worth it with the Nikon J series since they tried even less than Canon did with their mirrorless body.

I guess since no-one buys them, they're cheaper than your average premium compact at least.

File: 1.jpg (146KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
146KB, 1500x1000px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 21:20:48
Exposure Time1/50 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Brightness-6.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1500
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
24 posts and 12 images submitted.
>>
File: 2.jpg (328KB, 1008x1500px) Image search: [Google]
2.jpg
328KB, 1008x1500px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)66 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 21:40:19
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Brightness8.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length44.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1008
Image Height1500
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
>>
File: 3.jpg (161KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]
3.jpg
161KB, 1000x1500px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6300
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)46 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 21:40:35
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/13.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/13.0
Brightness6.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length31.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height1500
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastSoft
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
>>
Are you posting multiple threads with your shots or something?

>>2824193
>>2824198

File: P1120196.jpg (474KB, 2121x1593px) Image search: [Google]
P1120196.jpg
474KB, 2121x1593px
Hi guys
I just bought a 720nm filter to screw it on my Lumix G7
I will post some shots I've done and pp but I need help to make them more clear
97 posts and 48 images submitted.
>>
File: P1120183-2.jpg (554KB, 2121x1593px) Image search: [Google]
P1120183-2.jpg
554KB, 2121x1593px
>>
File: P1120200.jpg (738KB, 2121x1593px) Image search: [Google]
P1120200.jpg
738KB, 2121x1593px
>>
File: P1120202.jpg (665KB, 2121x1593px) Image search: [Google]
P1120202.jpg
665KB, 2121x1593px

File: DSC02459.jpg (2MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]
DSC02459.jpg
2MB, 1500x1000px
So I've been lurking /p/ for only about a week, in that time I've gathered that my camera, an a6000, seems to be meme tier around here.

Anyways I thought I'd post a few of my photos to get some critique.

I mostly do landscape and cosplay photography, and I'm constantly frustrated with how blurry and noisy my photos turn out. Yes I have a bad habit of pixel peeping and should stop doing that. So far all I have is the kit E PZ 16-50mm f3.6-5.6 OSS lens as well an E 55-210mm f4.5-6.3 OSS lens. I don't really know what I should be looking for the next time I invest in new glass.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:04:18 00:47:18
91 posts and 54 images submitted.
>>
File: DSC06281.jpg (1MB, 1000x1345px) Image search: [Google]
DSC06281.jpg
1MB, 1000x1345px
Also I'm not sure how to properly include EXIF data here when resizing my images.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:04:18 00:45:43
>>
File: DSC02819.jpg (761KB, 1478x630px) Image search: [Google]
DSC02819.jpg
761KB, 1478x630px
Might have figured it out on my own. Wasn't exporting all metadata in Lightroom.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-6000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:04:18 00:58:59
Exposure Time4 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Brightness-2.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length16.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: metadata settings.png (4KB, 598x139px) Image search: [Google]
metadata settings.png
4KB, 598x139px
>>2818407
The two immediate things that jut out to me is that the tint is really green and the balance on the river is too heavy. Also, starting off you want to scan the edges of the frame so you avoid including objects like the branch in the lower right hand corner. That branch definitely shouldn't be there.

What is that red thing in the center of the water?

As for subject, this isn't the most interesting place to take a photo.

So what if people here think a6000 is meme tier, it can still shoot photos. Personally I wouldn't want it because the viewfinder, but that doesn't make it any less capable.

This is how it looks in my export settings, never had to change anything to make sure it is included in my posts. Check if you camera is recording the data too.

File: photo.jpg (104KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
photo.jpg
104KB, 800x800px
Are you one of those people who are on the internet for the soul purpose of flaming people's pictures?

Then please flame someone's picture on this thread, and post a picture of someone else to flame.

I'll start it out with good old

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width800
Image Height800
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
/p/ burns down people's photographs as part of a concerted and ongoing effort to hammer into the human psyche what is not professional and what is not appealing to the eye.

It is an educational act which encourages caution in preparation, retention of technical skill, and experimentation in exercise.

There is no need for a separate flaming thread as /p/ has historically (if not so much today) managed to tear apart photographs successfully without such an aid.

The woman in your photograph (which you didn't take yourself) is a vengeful and tyrannical charlatan. She has little or no interest in the quality of life of working people. She has a self-congratulatory confidence which is deeply abhorrent and smile which never leaves a crease by her eye. She is false and bitter.
>>
>>2828563
/p/ does it without reason.

"This shit sucks" is not criticism or education. Fuck off.
>>
>>2828595
Actually "Shit sucks" is a way of catching the photographer's attention. If they bother to reply "why?" the poster is forced to explain themselves. If they can't their opinion is invalid - but if they do then it may expose actual weaknesses in the image and enlighten the photographer.

File: image.jpg (1013KB, 3600x2400px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1013KB, 3600x2400px
Hey I'm getting nearly perfect panoramas at around 10600px width and 5300px height. Need $$$ to cop a nodal ninja so it could be aligned easier.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T3i
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width10600
Image Height3975
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:04:30 04:28:54
Comment-&\#xd;&\#xa;Projection
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3600
Image Height2400
Scene Capture TypeStandard
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
I honesty don't get this 360 fad
>>
>>2828024
VR is becoming a thing
>>
inside houses for real estate agencies
inside cars for car dealers
inside touristic attractions or tour companies
basically, anything that needs selling, you could help market

File: nikond51600.jpg (275KB, 1656x1592px) Image search: [Google]
nikond51600.jpg
275KB, 1656x1592px
Some people say the AF is dead accurate, you just need to learn to use the right mode.
Others say the AF is crap.

Some say the DR is crap. Others say the DR is just fine.

Some say the high-iso is the same as Nikon D810.
Others say the high-iso is on another level.

What if Nikon's cargo got stolen, and this thief replaced all the D5's with D3 rebranded as D5?
11 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2827815
Fanboys, crappy testing methods, etc. etc.

The D810 has really been the dynamic range king of D-SLRs precisely because it uses a native base ISO of 64. It's a Sony sensor, but not even the A7r with the same sensor does quite as well (it still does excellent though). I don't even think the new 5DSR has base ISO below 100.

The D810 also has exceptional detail, even more so than more expensive ultra pro bodies like the 1Dx and D5. This is possibly what gives people the impression that it has equivalent ISO performance - but it definitely doesn't. The D810 does not do very well past 6400 and even then you'd better not have too many shadows, and you'd better plan on doing some NR and downscalling in post.
>>
>>2827815
>accurate
lol this meme

Are people really still autofocusing in 2016? For real?
>>
>>2827815
just buy an F5

stupid question
how do edit photos too look like this?
10 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>2827627
Shoot very bright scenes with light colored subject matter and overcast skies. Over expose slightly. Lower contrast drastically.
>>
>>2827629
thank you, im having a hard time deciding how i like to edit my photos
>>
Hint: This is not a good edit
Hint 2: This is not a good photo

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [423] [424] [425] [426] [427] [428] [429] [430] [431] [432] [433] [434] [435] [436] [437] [438] [439] [440] [441] [442] [443] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.