This board would attract way less attention from underage shitposters if it wasn't called /lit/... I propose a name change to /boo/ - Books.
Even better, call it /com/ for Comics & Books
/pol/'s codename is already /boo/ because it's about spooks
>>8684142
No. Fuck your comics.
6.5
For an answer which cannot be expressed the question too cannot be expressed.
The riddle does not exist.
If a question can be put at all, then it can also be answered.
6.51
Scepticism is not irrefutable, but palpably senseless, if it would doubt where a question cannot be asked.
For doubt can only exist where there is a question; a question only where there is an answer, and this only where something can be said.
6.52
We feel that even if all possible scientific questions be asnwered, the problems of life have still not been touched at all. Of course there is then no question left, and just this is the answer.
6.521
The solution of the problem of life is seen in the vanishing of this problem.
Ben Stiller BTFO
nombre si esta dificil jajajaja xD
Keep going.
6.522
There is indeed the inexpressible. This shows itself; it is the mystical.
6.53
The right method of philosophy would be this: To say nothing except what can be said, i.e. the propositions of natural science, i.e. something that has nothing to do with philosophy: and then always, when someone else wished to say something metaphysical, to demonstrate to him that he had given no meaning to certain signs in his propositions. This method would be unsatisfying to the other -- he would not have the feeling that we were teaching him philosophy -- but it would be the only strictly correct method.
6.54
My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
what are some books that will thoroughly convince me that suicide is my best course of action?
>>8683924
'Suicide Note' by Mitchell Heisman.
Halfway through you'll be so sick of the idea in general that you'll go outside and get on with your life out of sheer aggravation.
>>8683935
already read it. It was actually pretty interesting. Maybe not particularly edifying but I reminded me of Industrial society and ts Future. its always ineresting when text goes along with action.
>>8683924
The Conspiracy Against the Human Race by Thomas Ligotti
Haunted Universe: The True Knowledge of Enlightenment by Steven Norquist
Meursault did nothing wrong: yes or no and why
>>8683884
Yes because lyfe is ABSURD! Suns fucking annoying too.
OP says yes, of course, his trial was absurd...
the arab had it comin
Is it still possible to become a "philosopher" and to go down into the philosophical canon these days? It seems like no one writes large philosophical works these days, like most of the big names in the past.
yes, u just have to philosophize
All the good philosophies have been taken.
>Is it still possible to become a "philosopher"
yeah.
>and to go down into the philosophical canon
nah.
>>8683871
No. All the big work is being done in the applied sciences and all the ground that you might want to cover with continental or analytical philosophy has been done by the Indians far earlier and far better than you will ever do.
Any lawyers on /lit/? What do you guys read?
Sad bump
Specialist tax barrister here. I read The Pale King exclusively, repeatedly, and in perpetuity.
>>8683842
My father is a lawyer and he reads anything by/about Churchill and lots of history, mostly ancient Greek/Roman and European. The only fiction he reads is like Dumas and Defoe etc. True patrician.
Was it autism, /lit/?
>>8683815
no next
Was it autism, /lit/?
Was it autism, /lit/?
why is penguin considered the worst when they have the best covers
Does anyone have an epub download of the divine comedy with a good translation, illustrations by dore, and footnotes? Please i'm desperate
>>8683620
I have a mobi file of the penguin classics version.
If you are still here desu, please tell me. Can't be bothered to figure out how to upload this for naught.
>>8684575
And upon further investigation of this copy, I can tell you it does have the illustrations by dore and footnotes.
I also would appreciate that>>8684575
Hello guys first time posting on this board so don't know what to expect. Basically I need help completing a study guide for my literature class. We were assigned to read Hamlet, and of course being the cuck I am, I didn't read it. Any help would be awesome. Questions can be found in this google doc :https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DF68vIQ7miexF9XvBMPF0-A7z0xAVfGKqjmAViUaDds/edit?usp=sharing
>>8683586
Do your own homework, dumb fuck. This board is 18+. Go to bed.
>>8683603
One moment as I go and fuck myself
If I want to be taken seriously as a writer, do I have to write a "coming-of-age" novel or a story of my artistic development?
>pic related
maturation.
>>8683526
Yeah its basically like your resume, every great writer has to do it
My intent is not to start a STEM vs. Humanities/Social Science shit thread...but its one thing that I find common is when ever we asks questions about "Who you think the smartest man ever was" the answers tend to be mostly physical scientists or mathematicians..with the casual author or philosopher, social scientist thrown in
Now I don't believe science is an inherent superior field than the humanities/social science..I think every field is important, but is there a reason why most people answer scientists and mathematicians
Does something like General Relativity really require deeper thought than say Joyce's Ulysses
is someone like Von Neumann automatically smarter than Shakespeare?
its always hard to define what "intelligence" is in the first place,
but anyways, thoughts?
continued: I don't believe scientists are inherently smarter than social scientists/humanities
I'm asking if top tier scientists are required to think deeper than ss/h people
Probably
I think something like Ulysses is a product of not just pure thought but also creativity and other elements
while something like General Relativity is something that requires a sort of pure thought, whatever that means
but i understand your premise
Start with the goddamn Greeks, how many times we'll have to repeat it
What's everyone drinking and reading tonight /lit/?
On deck for myself, I'm almost done with Star Wars: Tarkin. Ehh. Sadly enough, it really didn't "capture" me in the same way, that the author's other book did, "Darth Plageous". It's good, and about one of my fav characters, but just not very entertaining at times.
As for drink, I have a dornfelder, red wine. Sweet to the taste, without candy sugary after taste.
>>8683466
Actually I'm listening to Star Wars:Bloodline
and drinking imperial pumpkin beer
Tarkin was a decent book, wasn't too into the flashback segments, but I did enjoy the character building and the relationship between Tarkin and Vader.
The new canon is so...by the books.
>>8683514
funny you mention 'listening' I'm actually listening to Tarkin as well through Audible, but I have the physical book in the pic, just to add to my star wars library collection. But most books I do audible.
How is Bloodline? Honestly it wasn't on my list, but I may give it a go later after Star Wars Catacylst, and The Expanse: Babylons Ashes
>>8683531
I'm 6 chapters in, but it gets surprisingly interesting if you're a Leia fan and have no qualms with female narration.
It helps to explain why and how the first order formed even if it feels rather forced.
Overall I find the Empire Era Disney canon material to be more interesting, but I am curious to see if the period between VI and VII will get something as good as the Thrawn trilogy.
Daily reminder
>>8683453
Who is that canonized figure?
The only good thing that came out of Bob Dylans existence was the end of Inside Llewyn Davis
I love it so much, because it shows the Swedish Academy finally took the public into consideration.
A poem is only complete when someone reads it, which means that people like Geoffrey Hill never really wrote poems, because no one actually bothered to read the obnoxious pseudointellectual bullshit they produced.
The heresies of modernism tried to remove poetry from the public, and Dylan, by the means of music, gave it back to them. Thank God for that!
I only think it should have gone to Cohen, though.
Whats the best/your favorite cover art?
The bit at bottom is the best part.