Were colonial empires worth it ? Sure, they brought a lot of prestige bute were loosely controled, as Japan proved during WW2. Economically, Germany who barely have colonies was doing fine and was catching up the UK.
We got the banh mi sandwich out of the deal, I'm ok with it.
Seriously though, the Brits seem very proud of their empire, but at the end of the day, their empire was pretty useless against the Axis.
>>2073715
They were garbage
Britain's greatest achievement is a hack
European empires are where it's at
Thoughts on this guy?
>>2073643
We-wuzing uralic ape.
Just like rest of the russians.
Wannabe Rasputin
His critique of liberalism is interesting, and should give the West a moment of reflection.
The problem is the determinism he uses. The thing with degradation is that it applies to every system. The problem lies in its capability to communicate its value and make up to the next generation, to assure its continuation...and in that regard we are failing, but damn...we have been going with modernity for some time now.
I agree with Dugin on a lot, but he should be regarded as a wake up call coming from the outside, to apply some introspection. We have most of the answers we need within our modern tradition, we just got lost during the 1960's when we entered into the post-modern retardation....that was basically a generation shitting on their responsibility to understand what they inherited, and creating the mess we need to clean up today....if it will not just outright destroy us first.
Seriously, the technological changes creating a different social context has been going on for a fucking long time now...its just these fucking neo-progressives who think they are ''wise'' in dealing with it, but they failed...and it starts to show ''bigly''
I figure this is the proper board to ask. /his/ what was the worst (best?) eternal BTFOing of all time?
>who?
>when?
>where?
you want cracked.com where you can get a meme list written by a 26 year old with no qualifications that badly outlines this topic in clickbaity fashion
>>2073510
>>2073528
no I wanted /his/ opinion on notable instances of BTFO
it's okay if you don't know that /his/ somebody else will surely have an answer for me
When did generals move away from the field to command their men?
>>2073463
When people started shooting them on sight
>>2073463
They've almost always been as far back as effectively commanding their army can allow. It's not cowardice either, killing the general at the outset is a near guarantee way to lose the battle and possibly war.
>>2073611
Are you mentally challenged?
Does every century have one great man that shapes that century and beyond? The ones I can think off the top of my head are Napoleon in the 19th century and Hitler in the 20th.
>>2072847
No, the Great Man view lf historiography is thoroughly ludicrous and has been debunked with many good counterpoints.
I believe that the general gist of it all can be found on wikipedia under Great Men Theory if you want to look in further.
>>2072860
>>2072860
Can we debunk it again? I've read the wikipedia page for it and I remain unconvinced.
Let's take Genghis Khan. On one side of the argument we have the Great Man understanding of history, in which Genghis, the exceptional figure and highest specimen of man, takes the reins of history and ushers in a new era. In the arguments opposing this view we simply point to a myriad of different factors of Mongolian culture, geographical location, social factors, etc. and say that Genghis Khan is simply the product of his environment. But this seems to imply that if Genghis Khan had never been born, the environment would remain essentially the same (as it had for centuries before that) and it also implies that a Genghis Khan figure was inevitable. And that to me seems thoroughly ludicrous.
>>2072916
And what about Mohammed? What about his founding a new, extraordinarily influential faith can be explained by the environment he was raised in? Surely others raised in that same environment were not bound to become the prophet of Islam.
Why were wars so much shorter in the Napoleonic era compared to other wars prior and after?
Because Napoleon raped their ass
>>2072935
But he lost.
>>2072828
Because the way Napoleon fought, he just went for fatal blow every time, not only tactically but also strategically.
>The Russian Revolutions of 1917, instead of having profoundly Social-Democratic/revolutionary Marxist and anarcho-syndicalist roots, comes through the influence of Max Stirner and egoism.
What happens, /his/?
The Great Spooks War of 1917.
Nothing happens
>>2072599
Capitalism, because capitalism will tend to be in your self interest in the early stages of capitalism and late stages of feudalism. It's only under developed capitalism does capitalism start to go against your self interests.
>The Thule Society (/ˈtuːlə/; German: Thule-Gesellschaft), originally the Studiengruppe für germanisches Altertum ("Study Group for Germanic Antiquity"), was a German occultist and völkisch group in Munich right after World War I, named after a mythical northern country from Greek legend. The Society is notable chiefly as the organization that sponsored the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (DAP; German Workers' Party), which was later reorganized by Adolf Hitler into the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP or Nazi Party). According to Hitler biographer Ian Kershaw, the organization's "membership list... reads like a Who's Who of early Nazi sympathizers and leading figures in Munich", including Rudolf Hess, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Julius Lehmann, Gottfried Feder, Dietrich Eckart, and Karl Harrer.[2]
Was it autism?
Sounds pretty cool desu.
Wasn't this in wolfenstein 2009? That was a good game
>>2072773
wolfenstein was a good game when it was in monochrome desu
*blocks your path*
>>2071930
*No, blocks YOUR path*
Pfft.. Nice boots milksop
*Grabs his helmet by the horns, yank him to the ground and punch him*
Vikings didn't have horned helmets.
The Philippines, December 8, 1941
You're MacArthur, the Japanese have just attack Pearl Harbor and are about to invade the Philippines.
What do?
>>2071727
invade australia and end shitposting before it begins
>>2071727
Construct fortifications and delay their advance until reinforcement comes from the Brits, then pincer attack them.
>>2071727
let them have it and go for more relevant islands instead
Aren't economies always "planned" anyway?
>>2071689
Yeah, but they can be more or less centrally planned.
Yes, it's a matter of who you put the planning load on and how it's structured. Letting consumers plan their own lives and manufacturers and distributors plan their own activities (kind of) works.
actually the never are
>Europe was destroyed for the faith of this country
But that's not Germany.
truly memeri
>The punishment meted out to thieves and prostitutes was unusual: they were paraded through the town sitting backwards on donkeys; they were tied to posts in public places, where people spat in their faces; they were flogged in the mosques. Crime was quickly wiped out. The people of Namangan still remember how they could leave their cars unlocked and tradesmen could leave their goods out for the night. The undisputed leader of this Islamic militia was the 24-year-old Tahir Yuldashev (Igor Rotar, “Under the Green Banner: Islamic Radicals in Russia and the Former Soviet Union,” Religion, State & Society 30(2), June 2002). - See more at: https://jamestown.org/program/will-the-fergana-valley-become-a-hotbed-of-destabilization-in-central-asia/#sthash.XX8iqAo2.dpuf
Does public humiliation work to deter crime?
>pic not exactly related to quote I provided, as pic is from IS
Does anonymous posting encourage shitposting?
people are degenerates who glorify criminals these days, alternating between saying dey dindu nuffin and if dey didu sumtin they were in the right
people just have no shame period these days
>>2071499
>implying the law isn't a spook
*throws grenade at you*
We're biblical prophecies written after the fact in order to make them line up with history ?
And what did the Bible prophecise?
>>2071427
Most early prophecy appears to be an artifact of visionary mysticism, at least in the OT. See: Ezekiel, Daniel, etc.
>>2071427
Not all of them, some are just construed to fit future events. Something common with all sorts of prophecies
So, why didn't Steiner attack?
He pussied out.
Honestly?
Because he wanted to get his men closer to the allies for surrender purposes.
He could have attacked but everybody who wasn't insane knew that the war was lost and it was every man for himself.
Steiner DID attack, just to the west to fight his way to the Americans so he wouldn't have to surrender to the Soviets.
Soviet gulags had a horrible reputation of killing german prisoners.
>>2071322
NEIN, NEIN, NEIN FEGELEIN FEGELEIN FEGELEIN!
that guy deserves an oscar.