Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2125. page

>>2142447
Teddy won.

Why Teddy and Churchill?

>>2142523
Because they represent America vs Britain symbolically and they're probably saving FDR for another battle. Who knows who'll go up against him.

File: 1480296824283s.jpg (2KB, 125x89px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x89px

>Roman Pontiff
Funny way of spelling Great Iman of the Universal, Ecumenic and Multicultural Caliphate.

>>2142448
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Pay attention, anon.

>>2142404
Only if the Holy Spirit permits it via conclave.

Even if foul play occurs in there, it's all guided by the Holy Spirit to an end only He can see.

I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR FREEDOM
SINCE I LEFT MY HOME TOWN

>>2142398
>Tfw your children will have to invent entirely new neologism for their era, since Post-post-modernism would sound silly.

File: 1474419899909.jpg (72KB, 775x1133px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 775x1133px

>>2142398

Goddamn. I feel old now.

>Tfw remembers when father had the talk to me about what we will do if Soviets shoot their nukes at us.

A brutal man in brutal times.

>>2142374
Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Not the hero they deserved, but the hero they needed.

>>2142066
>(also called Holland)
Please do not do this. What many foreigners do not know is the cultural cleansing done by the people from the region of Holland towards the other regions such as the pure and authentic Frysians.
We are called Dutch because a connection with Germans (Deutsch).

>>2142066
Duitsch was the general term for people who spoke a low or high German language.

I think it's Dutch as a folkish identity (think Deutsch for the German identity, English had Theedish iirc)
Holland is merely a region in the Netherlands. It's like calling all of America "Dixie".

>>2142036
No.

>>2142036
What do you mean by simple chemical warfare? Sheeling the see with chlorine?

>>2142037

Thanks for contributing.

Allied infantry was critical to it.

>>2141937
Probably break his bones, tear off bits and pieces of his body, feed him shit, keep him awake, inject him with drugs

basically unrefined tactics that USA used today

>>2141937
If you're writing a historical fiction book and intend to do your research on an image board you're not gonna write a very good book.

With that said, it completely depends on the situation. Is it similar to pic related or so they have him in an interrogation room?

>>2141950
>hey americaner i'm am going to mess you the HECKf UP

>break their bones fairly quickly

>sleep tight yanker

>the table has turned Offiser

I'd say no more for sanitary reasons than moral reasons.
Then again if the guy knows the risks, I guess.

>>2141832
This is one of those things that is basically rational it's just that no one's going to go to bat for corpse fucking.

why is necrophilia illegal?

>>2141679
>When are we going to start seeing the backlash against Christianity become more extreme?

Anticlericalism already went through its extreme phase.

>>2141679
> When are we going to start seeing a large movement calling for the closure of churches? The removal of Christianity from public life?
Never, it's already happening by itself. Christianity will be over in Europe by the end of the century, I guess it'll hold out in the US for a little longer.

>>2141679
t. Mahmoud "Taqiyya" Ibn-Mohammad Al-Jihad

No, just a forgery.

>>2141796

<citation needed>

>Was it autism?
Was it autism?

>catholics
>shows image of baptist church

>Woodland Heights Baptist Church

Why is /his/ illiterate?

>>2141606
OP's laziness aside. What's wrong with not taking bible autistically? It's not like Jesus would be angry about people gathering and making nice things together.

>>2141266

>Wins the Eastern Front literally by spamming soldiers

Let me guess, you just glanced at the casualty section of a battle on wikipedia and you think you're qualified to discuss WWII tactics now?

>>2141266
>>Mfw people call him a military genius
No one does though. The only praise he earns in circles of military enthusiasts is rooted in that he steadily eased his grasp on the military, and let generals slowly substitute his influence in the army.
Which is why ">Nearly kills his own Marshal just to protect his power" preoccupied Stalin once the war had been ended, considering that him drawing himself out of supervising the war had endowed Joukov (Zhukov) with popularity all across the USSR, and threatened that manlet Georgian.

>>2141288
Of course, where else could he learn about history?

Astarte was only given a masculine name in Akkadian text, by the way. Neither the new or old testament were written in Akkadian.

>>2141224
>he seems to get a lot of shit wrong
Looks like a random >edgy text on the internet, of course it gets shit wrong. Mainstream biblical scholarship admits all kinds of stuff about the Bible that your average person in the pew would never think about, there's no need to waste time looking at junk like that.

>>2141385
I was referring to the message which is essentially

>w-women used to have power and be respected! than the evil men came in and ruined everything! also the bible talks about gods when it's actually talking about goddesses

That in itself is a contradiction because little to nothing of the old or new testament is historically accurate, and Astarte was a name given in the Akkadian text. Also all the shit he mentioned above was predominately created in patriarchal societies.

This seems like something feminists would use as a springboard to justify hating men or something.

>When I first read the following tweet by Karan Johar about Kareena Kapoor and Saif Ali Khan’s newborn son, I was flabbergasted
>This was equivalent to an Israeli Muslim naming his or her son 'Hitler'.

kek. Not really that unplausable.

File: hitler_625x350_51432891366.jpg (72KB, 625x350px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 625x350px

>Taimur is to India what Hitler is to Israel

Does that mean Taimur is to Isreal what Hitler is to India?

>Timur is to Indians what Hitler is to Jews

But Timur killed more muslims than anyone in history ever. It's like gypsies trying to hog the spotlight from Jews.

>>2141121

The first KKK started out as just a fraternity type group where a few friends met and came up with goofy rituals just for fun. Then they at some point realized the recently emancipated blacks who had begun running amok in their neighborhood were a cowardly and superstitious lot, so they used the ghostly appearance and fire crosses to become one of the first real world superhero vigilantes. They also worked to drive out the republican whites who were trying to cripple the South with their punitive post-Civil War policies.

Eventually the first KKK peaked in popularity and got less popular over time until it mostly became a thing of the past. The Birth of a Nation came out and reminded everyone about the KKK and how great they were, which inspired a new generation to start participating in it. Then over time public perception became increasingly negative which drove the already secretive nature of its membership even further underground, which in turn lessened its popularity over time to the point where it was reduced to a relatively uncommon fringe activity.

There is no clear-cut "third KKK." Multiple groups since then have taken on the uniforms, naming conventions, and practices without having direct transmission of these practices from a previous KKK, so in that sense they constitute a new phase in the history of the KKK.

File: 5eb2f34b2f933236ee37e9b31c7cdfc7.jpg (157KB, 956x1473px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 956x1473px

>>2141169
So the Klan basically died in WW2?

How soon did it take for the Klan to go from fraternity to terrorism?
How influential were they in Southern politics?

>>2141253

>So the Klan basically died in WW2?

No, it never really begins or ends, there are just periods of increasing or decreasing popularity and groups that adopt the name and practices which don't necessarily receive them directly from preexisting groups.

>How soon did it take for the Klan to go from fraternity to terrorism?

Never, it was vigilantism, not terrorism.

>How influential were they in Southern politics?

Depends on the era. They were more openly involved in politics in the past.