Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2132. page

File: CD0509-UsAAZGY9.png (744KB, 600x748px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 600x748px

Maybe not propaganda but it is a poster made to commend the Empire of Japan allying with the Ottoman Empire

File: 1482524963430.jpg (100KB, 1530x960px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1530x960px

>>2132501

>why are people such savages?

ftfy

>>2132394
>why are leftists such savages?

ftfy

File: EQWZXTk.jpg (92KB, 702x867px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 702x867px

>>2132394

>In the 1970s someone who knew the woman in the photograph told newespapers the woman was repeatedly gang raped during occupation and was labeled a "collaborator" after the fall of the Third Reich

That's fucking rad as hell, thanks for teaching me OP

The Swedish National Bank is almost 400 years old, making it the oldest national bank in history.
Stora Kopparbergs Bergslag AB(stock trade company) is the worlds oldest stock trading company with documents tracing its stock trading all the way back to 1288.
Posten AB(lit. The Mail) was established in 1636.

>>2132180
Moët & Chandon.
273 years old.
Produces champagne.
Dom Perignon is said of started the buisness.

Why not? Having another Neville Chamberlain as Prime Minister would have meant you lose the fucking war.

>>2132179
He was though, niggerfaggot.

>>2132179
>everything commonly agreed on in history is wrong and i'm going to be smug about it like it's obvious

/his/ in a nutshell. sigh

>historically accurate
Which is why I have an Irishman sitting on the throne of the roman empire

if an arab can become an emperor, why not some irishman ?

I have it on steam but haven't played it much. I'd like to get into it more but it's quite daunting.

>implying you don't give up some of your natural rights to coexist with others in civilized society
>implying this doesn't necessarily mean you are under 'natural law' when existing in a free state, away from civilization.

There I just defined the term Pepe was going to shoot me for using Hobbesian logic.

>>2131937
Natural law = path of least resistance

>>2131962
what are rights?

>>2131918
>lit> is that way ----->

Augustine, Aquinas, Ireneaus, and many other Church fathers did great.

>>2131990
>Augustine, Aquinas, Ireneaus, and many other Church fathers did great.

No, they are all charlatans.

And this board is "& Humanities" so I will NOT go back, thank you very much!

>>2132020
>No, they are all charlatans.

Right, once again </lit --->> over there.

He is an Arianist on steroids, Arianism has been asked and answered many times, for about 1700 years.

"Tolstoy thus reduced religion to morality, and for him the most eloquent moral code ever articulated by a human being was Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. He suspected all theological mysteries and dogmas to have been added by deceitful state or church authorities. So he warned that one must read both the Bible and theological pronouncements on it very cautiously, filtering every proposition through the invaluable test of reason."

Ummm no, that is not the gospel. Scripture, tradition, and reason tell us otherwise.

Latin languages names can be very long, it's a cultural thing.

That was full name of Pedro I of Brazil: Pedro de Alcântara Francisco António João Carlos Xavier de Paula Miguel Rafael Joaquim José Gonzaga Pascoal Cipriano Serafim

From what I remember most people only had 3. There was a given name, of which only about a dozen or so were in circulation at a time, a family name, which is kind of like our surnames but more homogenous and more directly linked to a "clan", and a "street name" or common name. This would be like a nickname, Rufus if you had red hair for example.

Not sure why Emperors had ridiculously long names.

Caesar and Augustus were more titles than names when Marcus Aurelius was emperor.
Pius should be self-explanatory.

>>2131732
Its a meme you dip.

>>2131732
They were made by the Germans to show the Soviets as a subhuman horde.

>>2131880
Why did the Germans draw their own women being raped by "the enemy?" It looks like porn.

there's a point in there, somewhere.

WWII enthusiasts who really don't know that much will go on and on at length about how in WWII, battleships became obsolete and were superseded by carriers. And they go on to imagine this generation of crusty old battleship admirals who didn't know what they were doing, while the young dynamic carrier admirals came in to save the day, etc. etc.

Well the reason that carriers superseded battleships is because the American navy made it happen. They had to. Carriers were all they had left, and needed to pioneer carrier warfare out of necessity.

Well, they also had their submarine fleets. But the Americans did all they could to not advertise just how huge an impact they had on the outcome of the war.

>>2132171
>Well, they also had their submarine fleets. But the Americans did all they could to not advertise just how huge an impact they had on the outcome of the war.
That might be partly because of the horrific casualty rate. The more you brag about your subs, the more you'll make people aware of how many died.

>>2132171

>I have no idea what I'm talking about: The Post.

America entered the war with 16 Battleships afloat (17 if you count the Wyoming), and another 7 in various states of construction. Pearl Harbor "sank" 4 of the oldest, and half of those were dredged back up eventually.

Carriers were not "all they had left" you daft bastard.

File: 1452840424024.jpg (74KB, 640x450px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x450px

>>2131366
>what is the possibility the Platonic fabled city of Atlantis was sunk by God, like Noah's world?
>implying Atlantis is not Sardinia

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/15/bronze-age-sardinia-archaeology-atlantis

Is this just one guy posting about Sardinia everywhere, or is it some kind of /his/ meme?

Which God would you be talking about? There's a couple thousand

>>2131278
I hope you realize there isn't any truth in that pic at all

>>2131287
Mate that picture is obviously a joke

>>2131278

Knowing which country you're in may be helpful.

>>2131032
>the civilised world was under one empire.

You can argue that the western civilized world was for a very short amount of time under one empire (Alexander the Great), but apart from that Europe and Persia were never united, not to speak about China and India

>It's hard to propose a stupid idea such as democracy, socialism or free market capitalism when you're arguing against 1,000 years of tradition.
is it?

>>2131032
>From antiquity to the late middle ages, the civilised world was under one empire.

So the Indian, Chinese, and Persian empires for some reason don't count?

>>2130457
He put a gun to Cowboy Bill's head, pulled the trigger and now he's dead.

>>2130470
It's only a rumore

>>2130457
he did though
conspiracy to murder is a crime where I'm from

Ribbentrop was an incompetent buffoon, the pact only went as far as the USSR wanted.

>>2130392
Gone further where? Two superpowers with opposite ideologies wouldn't live in peace after having common border.

>>2131843
I mean they were both nationalist socialists. Not to mention the Germs needed resources the USSR could provide while defeating the decadent west like they so wanted.