How can one be sure that one knows anything? All knowledge or all supposed truths seem dependent, in the end, in some sort of assumption that is difficult to trace back or explain. One can put axioms out there and seem to get pretty far, but that's a kind of assumption as well.
Following up on this, how would you decide which initial truths or assumptions to accept? It seems like your selection of which fundamental beliefs to accept- whether or not the mind can really understand its surroundings as they are and not as they perceive it could be one, maybe- would probably be decided on based on even more arbitrary factors that would rely on assumptions.
How is this explained in philosophy? Who are some notable 'philosophers of knowing' or even thinking, and how might they answer these questions? Or if these questions are incorrect or say things incorrectly, why would that be?
The doubter cannot doubt the fact of his doubt.
>>2207305
don't you mean the doubter MUST doubt the fact of his doubt?
>>2207256
>How can one be sure that one knows anything?
try hard to keep your memories accurate.
> Following up on this, how would you decide which initial truths or assumptions to accept?
Do what seems logical to you. This will manifest to people throughout the world in different ways because we are raised differently but its the best we got to knowing truth.
For example, I was raised Christian and accept a form of the Christian doctrine as being true. I know of arguments for and against the religion, but the way I understand the religion seems logical enough to me for to be an accurate estimation of truth. This acceptance brings order to a chaotic universe, purpose to an disorderly existence and meaning to our lives as humans. If I was raised in Saudi Arabia, I'd probably be Muslim. If I was raised in Japan I might be Buddhist. But because I've been raised Christian and understand Christianity better than all those religions I've accepted in a form that appears logical to me.
>>2207256
>It seems like your selection of which fundamental beliefs to accept- whether or not the mind can really understand its surroundings as they are and not as they perceive it could be one, maybe- would probably be decided on based on even more arbitrary factors that would rely on assumptions.
The arbitrariness assumes you aren't where you are for reason. A lot of belief systems (mine included) don't think this is the case.
>>2207615
No.