I understand that historians hate it when the middle ages are called "the dark ages" because that term seems to denote a time of anti-intellectualism and loss of culture, but why exactly did art become so bad after the fall of the Western Roman Empire? Is it not because of loss of culture?
Byzantine style sucks so much in comparison to classical Roman and Renaissance style.
Art was shit in ancient world, everything improved after Rome was destroyed. Science and mathematics flourished in Catholic Europe.
Respected historian Rodney Stark said so. He not cherrypick and shilling on behalf of reactionary Catholicism
>>2268785
It was like that on purpose. We just think of it as bad, but the artists didn't care about depicting anyone, especially religious figures as natural. You can thank the Renaissance for the return to depicting humans more naturally.
Also
>gothic art
>bad
>>2268882
This.
The metaphysical, otherworldly element of Medieval art can't be overlooked. You're meant to see all their work as glimpses into another world, and guides for the living to follow in order to achieve that world.
Why did Reagan and Obama both go after Gaddafi?
Reagan: bombed Libya in retaliation for the Lockerbie bombing
Obama: led NATO intervention to support rebellion against Gaddafi, failed to prevent rebels from then slaughtering each oher
>>2268789
Yes, but why did they REALLY
Mess with the best, die like the rest.
>coastlines during the last ice age ran hundreds of miles into what is now the ocean
>most human settlements are established on the coastlines
>aquatic archaeology is extremely underrepresented in the field but has already yielded several megalithic sites like pic related
>several pre-bronze age sites and artifacts exist and many of the bronze age sites are of questionable origin
>there is evidence of some large scale climatic disaster in the fossil record around 12,000 years ago which would have easily sent any civilization present at the time back to the stone age
"lol, there were no civilizations on Earth predating the ones we found in the deserts where conditions would be good for preserving evidence of early civilization"
t. archaeologists
Why do you chumps tow the party line on this issue?
coastalcucks btfo
Will they EVER learn?
>some apes stacked some rocks into a circle
>'civilization'
you keep making this thread over and over again and getting BTFO looks like you're getting saltier now lel
aliensfag or christcuck which are you?
>Much that once was is lost, for none now live who remember it.
https://youtu.be/cvxuT0CK1oU
Why do Muslims hate the Jews/West so much, when the Mongols are really the ones that fucked them up?
Because Jews are currently occupying what they believe to be traditionally Islamic lands.
No reason to hate the Mongols when they haven't really done anything for ~700 years
>>2269088
>traditionally Islamic lands.
They can fuck off. Jews were living on those lands a thousand years before Muhammad even popped out of his mothers cootch
>>2269109
Do you really expect muslims to see it that way though?
> Wake up
> Be able to control time
> Imortal
> Shape shifting
What period/s would you go to? How badly would you fuck up history?
No loopholes or consequences for time travel
>implying I wouldn't be using it to pause time and commit heinous sex crimes
That and spend several dozen lifetimes existing as various forms of government official and artisan in ancient civilizations.
>>2268594
If you could shape shift why would you need to pause time to get laid?
>>2268603
>see qt grill
>pause time
>fetch roll of duct tape
I mean, I could presumably undo whatever damage I did by reverting to an earlier timeline.
Also, I want to figure out what was going on in the five thousand years or so before writing.
All we have is a bunch of megaliths and I feel like we're missing most of the cool stuff from the neolithic.
Friendly reminder to the stormfags that browse this board the both the Confederate States of America AND Nazi Germany lost the only wars they ever fought.
Allies didn't win WWII
Wake up sheeple
>>2268563
This.
OP=pleb
>>2268561
>lose your wars
>somehow this means that none of your ideas can ever hold merit
What did he mean by this?
I'm working on a paper right now over The Battle of Hastings. In doing so, I need to look at competing positions offered by the Normans and Anglo-Saxons, using supporting sources as necessary. Looking for some good primary and secondary sources that can be easily accessed tonight. Was violence immediately sought or did it only occur because other options were exhausted?
The English refused to agree that garlic is the greatest vegetable on earth so frogs made them eat their baguette
>>2268450
I don't have any links for you but I can tell you that both Harald and William knew it was going to be a fight.
>>2268500
kek
>Killing a human under any reason can be justified
>>2268417
>Implying it can't
>>2268417
liberals aren't welcome
>>2268465
I pity people like you who apply the liberal-conservative dichotomy to everything they see. I give you the benefit of doubt that you simply don't have the appropriate, precise vocabulary learned, though, rather than being in ideological fervor or simply being mentally handicapped.
what are some good history oriented youtubers out there?
this guy does alot of whispering vids on historical things
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL78HBGTSjrBsfFrOdKID_TwUfb68BKedm
>>2268346
lindybeige
crash course world history
>>2268353
>crash course
Why did it fail so badly?
>>2268337
Greeks aren't really empire builders.
>>2268341
are you implying that certain races and cultures have different dispositions?
>>2268347
Are you implying that "Greek" is a race?
Clearly cultures would have different methods of bureaucracy and political organization that would make them more ore less effective in matters of state.
Why the American government don't apologise from the atrocities in Vietnam?
Oh,i forgot,is the United States,the all-loving United States!
Fuckin Yankees.
laying it on a bit thick m8
we dindu nuffin
Here a more pics.
How do we balance the genders?
Man is king of everything outside of the home; Woman is queen of everything inside.
>>2268143
Cut off all men's penises
Fuse them together
Its not "conservative". Most conservative parties on the planet do not oppose large government or support free market. They want big government to preserve traditions and culture with an economy that services the nation instead of the other way around.
They are closer to liberal but that isn't it either. Classical liberalism holds social liberal values and isn't interventionist, opposite of being socially conservative and projecting military across the globe.
They just love corporations and whatever values their voters want. Not that the democratic party is much better.
Also sidenote, the names Republican and Democratic Party are so fucking stupid, they both support democracy and republican ideals. What the fuck is up with those retarded names? Seriously.
Their ideology is to maintain power at all costs. Same as the Democrats.
American politics was a mistake and the Constitution was badly written.
>>2268076
Is some form of spirituality, religion or otherwise, necessary for humans? The current moral decay of the west seems to be a result of overdosing on materialism and having a population who never bother with introspection.
Yes, people always want the feeling of being a part of something greater. If it isn't god, it's the cosmos.
>>2267808
>necessary for humans?
What is humanity's goal? What could spiritualism be necessary for?
Sorry to sound pretentious but that sounds like spiritualism to famalam.
>>2267840
>What is humanity's goal? What could spiritualism be necessary for?
The will to keep on existing. As noted in another thread the objective truth of the universe is nihilism. If nothing we ever do matters then why bother? A sense that we are achieving something and part of something greater is necessary to avoid the philosophical ramifications of a purely objectivist view of the cosmos.
I know it's depressing, unhelpful, and edgy but nihilism is truth isn't it.
I have been thinking about it for a while now and all I have done is figure out how people previously avoided and found the depressing end of thought in scientific based reasoning. We exist to struggle so we can create children who then also struggle. I'm going through Petersons lectures but he essentially dismisses it as unhelpful.
I haven't found anyone who can dispute nihilism. Has anyone?
>>2267719
Jesus.
The person nihilism seeks to disprove.
>>2267727
God is long dead now.
>>2267719
why is Friedrich the pic related?
He was AGAINST nihilism.