Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1935. page

File: Pornos.jpg (757KB, 1349x2632px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 1349x2632px

>>2263749
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWM4bJNpch0

>>2263749
I'm gonna need a source for that. Not the girl in the picture but the rise in popularity of pornography depiciting Middle Eastern/Muslim women.

>>2263760
This, I have seen a rise in her popularity not middle eastern porn in general

Here's an example of this:

In early civilizations, populations were a lot smaller and many people did not make it to adulthood. This meant that religion needed to encourage stable relationships between a man a woman, and it also needed to encourage lots of childbirth so that civilization could grow.

In modern day we have plenty of people to accomplish the tasks that we need to. Infant deaths are extremely low compared to even just 100 years ago. So when religion says, "Only a man and woman can be married, and they can use contraceptives" it doesn't make sense anymore. If you were to limit the use of contraceptives for religious reasons, the population would skyrocket. And most of these would be uneducated poor people. (Nothing against them, we just don't really benefit from more of them). In modern context, a lot of things in religion just don't apply anymore. Sure the basic stuff like don't kill, steal, etc. still apply, but that information can be conveyed without religion.

>>2263583
And they can't use contraceptives*

File: 'The_Fall_of_Icarus',_17th_century,_Musée_Antoine_Vivenel.jpg (1022KB, 2885x1640px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 2885x1640px

>>2263561
You should spend more time reading and less time listening to ""punk"" music.

>>2263502
It basically destroyed the "necessary evil" argument for slavery and made Northerners think that the country was becoming a bitch for the slave lobby, which they already thought after the Mexican-American War.

Seriously.

The lead justice thought

>I'll make a ruling and fix this once and for good, and that will solve the problem

>>2263510
Still though, by ruling that blacks weren't citizens and had no right to sue in free states it basically made the Compromise of 1850.

White abolitionists had made the argument that slaveholders would eventually treat whites the way they treated blacks to much effectiveness and that slavery would lead to the growth of a new aristocracy, and this decision basically proved it.

Were they all Southerners on the court or something? It just seems like such an objectively bad decision, even in the context of the time. He could've just upheld the status quo.

>>2263466
Discuss our favorite French monarchs

>>2263466
Talk about the Boer and Irish genocides.

File: hqdefault.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>2263475
He suddenly goes on a rant about how England won the Hundred Years war. What's your move?

>>2263394
>Adolf Hitler was into History and Humanities

watched films about romans all day at his comfy house in bavaria

Oy vey shut humanities down

Adolf Hitler drank water.
Adolf Hitler ate food.
Adolf Hitler read books.
Adolf Hitler could walk.

wtf i hate all of those things now

What do you mean, hats are still popular.
Baseball caps are still everywhere.

If you're talking about fedoras and top hats, they became passé after JFK gave his innagural speech without one

File: abc_gma_jfk_110120_wg.jpg (68KB, 658x370px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 658x370px

>>2263371
a common myth

>>2263297
Stunning revelations.

he probably realized this marxism shit isn't going anywhere and that its only promotion is from his colleagues that are still stuck in the nostalgia of the 60s

I alternate between being a white nationalist and an internationalist communist, but then again I'm schizophrenic.

File: India_Portugal_Goa.png (218KB, 686x1348px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 686x1348px

>>2263275
Cold War era.

The cleaning of house and realignment of virtually every single major power, combined with the decolonization wars, is fascinating as fuck. I don't think we will ever see an era as exiting in quite some time with the World flung into such polar opposite factions.

Honestly, modern and contemporary. Meme away, idgaf.

>>2263275
That body shape reminds me of my ex

Yes. He killed many yankees until getting wounded. Good times.

File: 1479961522973.jpg (61KB, 629x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 629x800px

>>2263261
How many did he get, anon?

All four of grandparents were Yugoslav partizans

>>2263179
yes

>>2263188
>"""""thread"""""

Yes, while objectivism and Rand's philosophy are somewhat useful on an individual level, they quickly fall apart when applied to governments and economies

>>2263159

You seem to be confusing bail with parole, OP.

Bail is just an amount of money you put up in order to await trial in your own home instead of in a local jail cell. If you're found guilty, no matter how much money you put up, you don't get to walk away.

Parole is when they lessen time off of a sentence for any number of reasons.


Also, most people wouldn't be imprisoned for a first offense misdemeanor simple assault.

>why is giving a longer sentence; then softening that with bail seen as the best policy

Assuming you mean parole, is because it allows for customization of the sentence. Someone, I don't know, steals something. They get the statutory minimum at the very least, and if they behave in prison and seem to have learned their lesson, they get out shorter; if they don't, they can sit in a cell longer. (Which also provides incentive to behave in prison). Since for almost every crime, sentencing guidelines are given as ranges anyway, it's not like you give up much.

>>2263192
ah; well I suppose I confuse the two
embarrassment on my part here

bail I think is part of the issue however, because a combination of bail and a suspended sentence (or parole) often sees an offender walk back into their community the day after they commit a crime; go about their buisines for months until their hearing/trial, then get out after three weeks in low security prison

you have put that person through three institutions, the community hasn't been protected, there isn't a lifestyle change that could help that person get straight
it's especially worrying for drug-violence hybrids

the "customization" argument is common, but doing this through suspended sentences has a number of effect I would question

primarily it puts power in the hands of the prison and the parole board
I would question if the judge was not the most appropriate person to make these decisions

I don't think parole hearings provide enough rights, it's the same time in prison a court would hand down at the end of the day

and I doubt it's effective trying to measure someones behavior in a prison setting and infer what they would do in the community
for serious offenders I understand it' about protecting the community; but the vast majority here are petty-mid offenses

we also see a serious discrepancy with how people are given suspended sentences and parole hearings
there are social arguments made that I think overstep the place of judges and take power away from the community

After having been on the receiving end of our legal system, I feel like I truly have been "red pilled" so-to-speak when it comes to how the courts operate. If you browse sites like Reddit, the court system is always painted in this black and white fashion that operates strictly by the book. It's thought of as this soulless entity that issues punishments verbatim as dictated by the law.

But I have learned that really couldn't be further from the truth.

The attorneys, public defenders, and district attorneys all collaborate outside of the court room and use a great deal of common sense. Factors taken into consideration include prior history, your income/job, what kind of family you have, the neighborhood you live in, etc... and they use this information to come to an agreement on what kind of sentence you should receive. Then they present it to the judge, the judge approves, and you're done.

At least that is how they do it here in Massachusetts. I should be in prison considering what I was arrested for but I am not and I virtually got everything dismissed given my circumstances. They dragged me through the whole procedure of arraignment, pre-trial hearing, motion for discovery, RE-SCHEDULING THREE FUCKING TIMES, and then the actual trial date itself. Then the day before the trial, I am informed that the DA and my attorney have reached an agreement that got me a favorable deal so we don't have to go to trial. The entire thing felt like a fucking charade.

I dunno man. bottom line is, don't trust the retarded liberal shit you read on reddit, because they are all retards. That is what I am getting at here.

>>2263139
>everyone having atomic bombs
If anything I feel like Germany would get BTFO as easily since people like Russia and France would be more prepared and stuff

>>2263139
This is bait, right?
On the off chance that it isn't the difference is that those things get invented five years later.

>>2263155
The U.S. started researching atomic weapons long before it entered the war. You think things like nuclear technology and jet engines wouldn't have been developed without a war?

And the American Civil War had no affect on the invention of dynamite, nor technology that was already in the process of being integrated before the war broke out, but wasn't fully used, like repeater rifles.

>>2263059
Mongolian Empire, during the rule of Chengis Khan. That motherfucker literally ruled China and Russia at the same time. Sure, it splintered into four factions right after his death, but damn he was terrifying when he was alive.

>>2263059
German empire till 1914

Pioneered modern social welfare, allows me to live comfy off NEET bux


prussian eagle is really cool

had fucking awesome uniforms

>>2263076
This and the British.

>>2263009
they are assholes.

>>2263009
My friend is Sweden says they are notorious for theft and committing crime. My other friend in the UK says they are immigrants leeching the system.

>>2263009
Success breeds envy

>>2262959
Why becoming the Emperor was the mistake of the century

>>2262969
What should he have done?

>>2262959
Was Napoleon another Hitler?
>Invades russia
>Gets rest of europe to declare war against him
>Implement gas fittings in every town