Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1932. page

>>2257538
Communism.

File: 8C6B68C3-2D21-4503-804F-8CFEF29615F0-1606-0000014CA22C41D7_tmp.jpg (33KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 512x288px

>>2257538
Or live in commie blocks?
Kek, better suburbia then living in these monstrosities

File: 1482846440701.jpg (64KB, 693x490px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 693x490px

>>2257538
>misallocation of resources
Who would do a better job of allocating resources? The State?

https://www.youtube.com/user/lindybeige

>>2257142
kek

>>2267866
>implying utilitarians actually exist

Who are you quoting?

>>2267888
I've met many utilitarians in my lifetime

>>2267888
>Implying utilitarianism isn't one of the predominant ideologies throughout the English-speaking world
>Implying you know what utilitarianism is
>Implying I didn't take your b8

There is literally nothing wrong with bread and circuses anyone that mentions it or criticizes it as a concept is a fedora lord thinking they said something profound on the internet.

>>2267776
Yes. Normies and chads are useless

>>2267818

Oh it's you again. Didn't you make an autistic thread a while back where you lost your shit because people too a dump on you for supporting bread and circuses?

File: two.png (122KB, 322x323px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 322x323px

Unless Gaius Julius Caesar immediately lays down his command, disbands his legions and returns to Rome for trial,

File: three.png (288KB, 775x479px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 775x479px

this sacred assembly will declare him a public enemy of the Senate and People of Rome!

VVE MVST BVILD A VVALL

I continue chilling in the soon to be Confederation of the Rhine

He must have a long reach from his shitty little island

Oh wait

File: Charles_Thévenin_-_Reddition_de_la_ville_d'Ulm.jpg (208KB, 1024x665px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1024x665px

>>2267149
Surrender my army to him

>>2267004

Pre or Post 1945?

what kind of chink flag is that? didnt the chinks get BTFO by based japs?

>>2267015
Nationalist China.

>>2266937
Because Christians and "Heteros" never complain about it as if its a widespread problem, unless they want to be dismissive of other people then they use the same exact "logic" you do.

Because neither of those groups are whiny little bitches.

Except for possibly you, OP.

>>2266937
Because those are terms were made up by extremists in order to subvert universities and the intellectual quality of Western education.

anyone know what it is?

>>2266834
Probably a worthless souvenir. They sell a shit ton of letter openers in tourist traps in Italy.

>>2266841
This. Guessing Florentine given the lily and Medici motifs on it.
Still neat for a piece of shit though, anon.

Philosophical argument for the nature of the cause of the universe:
(1.1) The cause of the universe is a being by which the universe came to exist.
(1.2) The cause of the universe either has to exist, could or could not exist, or cannot exist.
(1.3) If the cause of the universe is something, its existence is not impossible.
(1.4) If the cause of the universe could not exist, it’s not the actual cause of the universe but a mere means.
(1.5) Therefore, the cause of the universe has to exist. It’s uncaused and necessary.
(1.6) Therefore, it cannot change from one state to another. It’s changeless.
(1.7) If temporal, spacial or material beings can change, the cause of the universe must be timeless, spaceless and immaterial.
(2.1) A changeless being caused the universe.
(2.2) Therefore, the cause of the universe cannot be impersonal.
(2.3) Therefore, the cause of the universe must be personal.
(3.1) Among explanations based on the same evidence, the simplest one is the most probable.
(3.2) The cause of the universe is something necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial and personal.
(3.3) Therefore,it is most probable that the cause of the universe is one necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial and personal being.

(2/?)

>>2266810
That's like saying that just because you can theoretically cut a rope infinite times before reaching the middle that there is no middle.

Modal ontological argument:
(1) The greastest being is defined as a being that possesses all virtues at its maximum grade and all flaws at its minimum grade.
(2) Such being, by definition, would have to be all-powerful, all-knowing and all-loving (therefore personal), since these properties are greater than their negations.
(3) These properties doesn’t contradict each other.
(4) Therefore, it’s possible that the greatest being exists.
(5) Therefore, it exists in one possible reality.
(6) Therefore, it exists in all possible realities. It’s greater to exist in all possible realities than just some of them.
(7) Therefore, the greastest being cannot not exist. It’s necessary.
(8) Therefore, the greatest being is uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless and immaterial.
(9) This reality is a possible reality.
(10) Therefore, the greatest being exists.
(11) Therefore, an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, personal, necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial being exists.

Putting two and two together:
(1) Among explanations based on the same evidence, the simplest one is the most probable.
(2) The cause of the universe is something necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal being.
(3) The greatest being is an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, personal, necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial being.
(4) Therefore, it is most probable that the cause of the universe is one all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, necessary, uncaused, changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal being.

(3/3)

What are you saying...?

>>2266565
probably another retarded brown american like durr greeks are not white how could he possibly have had blonde hair
kys op

File: 3cu3qvf-640x426.jpg (43KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x426px

>>2266565
>>2266570

File: ff6f52e5031aed350ddb4f7c74434bfc.jpg (49KB, 466x700px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 466x700px

>>2266448
The numbers were a little overblown, but people were far more active back in the day.

If you were a soldier/sailor/slave you were basically lifting and running all day, everyday from the age of 12 or younger. A well nourished athlete might have been Zyzz-tier.

We know that Greek rowers able to traverse the Aegean at speeds that the fittest rowers today cannot match.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070208100643.htm

>>2266507
tl;dr:

Athenian Trireme crews were able to row at performances equal to or greater than modern elite rowers.

Ancient Athens had up to 200 triremes at any one time, and with 170 rowers in each ship. That's about 27,000 men out of a total male population of about 150,000, so the rowers were clearly not a small elite.

Fir comparison, the UK today would struggle to man a trireme fleet of this size, so the Athenians likely were far more shredded than puny moderns.

>>2266507
>>2266550
How do we know their records are accurate?

>>2266295
Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules is a good place to start if you're interested in the history of the U.S. education system.

>>2266300
T-Thanks

>>2266295
I want more from this meme

>>2266168

Islam believes in the separation of head and body

>>2266168
>>2266174
>implying there is anything wrong with beheading

>>2266168
Arabs man... theyre killing a turk soldier, also muslim

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Persian_Wars

Why are you asking, literal google question?

>asks a question the map he posted clearly shows that they did when they annexed regions in Western Iran and the capital of the Safavid empire at the time
that is a pretty impressive display of being oblivious, I gotta say