Can we talk about Gnostism here?
>>2270974
Here is the missing c.
>>2270974
What is it you want to talk about?
It's definitely a refreshing look at religion, especially as the most major syncretic eastern-western tradition (semitic/hellenic/indic extraction) but every other organized group has pretty roundly stamped them out.
Also, are you a Jung/Eliade fan?
Probably. But you're probably gonna get shitposted to death by the fundie shitposter.
What's the deal with gnosticism? As I understand it it's Christianity with a weird meditative and esoteric tradition and sometimes dualism.
I tried to research this on my own but got kind of confused. My big question is did it involve any form of income tax at all?
>>2270898
usually tax rate would be between 1-3% on your wealth, but higher in wartime. sometimes there would be an income tax in Urban areas.
in Rural areas where organised tax collection was either impossible or poorly executed Rome would put a levy and lump sum tax on the provincial governor, as long as he paid and supplied the soldiers needed, be basically got free reign over the region.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/299558 http://www.unrv.com/economy/roman-taxes.php
>>2270901
That's fascinating. I wonder, why was tax collection impossible as you say? Is the issue that people live in very low density areas with little oversight, or is it something else? If, as I imagine is the case, taxation was made impracticable because of a lack of census data (address, income, etc), then how did Roman authorities determine how much to tax provincial governors in their lump sum payments?
Additionally, how would taxes be paid? With cattle? Gold? Was there a Roman equivalent of filling your taxes? If so, what would that process entail?
>>2270902
The individual cities and communities in the provinces usually performed their own census, which could be used as a starting point. Free landowners outside of the cities had to pay taxes based on the size of their property. The tarrifs and tolls could be evaluated by just watching the traffic for some time, calculating the amount of money you would have charged in that time and then calculating it for a whole year.
Taxes were usually paid in roman or local currencies (there were still hundreds, even in the late empire). Filling your taxes: Not really, the closest thing would be the census, where roman officials (or your local magistrate) would make a list of every citizen and non-citizen in town and evaluate their wealth. You would then get assigned to a certain tax class and had to pay taxes based on that (or not, if you were a roman citizen or otherwise privileged).
Hey /his/. I'm fascinated with WW1 and in general the late Victorian era. The entire time period is such an interesting topic for me. Im still pretty new to learning history, and one thing Ive been meaning to research is Otto Von Bismark and is Bismarkian diplomacy.
Does anyone have any good book suggestions on Ol' Otto and his diplomacy policies. Any suggestion is appreciated, especially if I can find it on audible.
Bumping with old war pics.
I have a lot less WW1 pics than I remember
30 years war wouldn't have been won without Sweden
>>2270724
yes
>>2270726
Do you mean yes as in: "Yes it would've been won without sweden" or are you agreeing with me?
>>2270724
There was a victor?
Who was the most villainous person in history?
I'm not neccessarily talking about the person who did the worst things, but the person who acted like a mustache twirling villain as well.
Probably him to be honest. He was a bloody lunatic and a brutal man.
Luigi Cadorna.
How no one didn't just kill him after his first fuck up is baffling.
>>2270696
Is he that guy who wanted to start up the mongol empire again?
Is nature misogynistic?
>>2270552
Nature has no intent. Evolution has no goal. It just is.
>>2270552
Sauce of statue?
>>2270559
>Has no internet yet still has order
>DNA has a code
relative to his time
>>2270492
No. All tactics and no strategy makes for a decent general at best. There were better guys, even in his own period.
no, because he ultimately lost at the end.
>but but carthage didn't support him right
maybe, but still you can't be the GOAT if all your brilliance comes out to nothing
>>2270492
>eternal Bantu strikes again.
I want to learn about ancient Greece, where do I go?
>>2270374
Primary sources and authoritative secondary sources.
>>2270383
Thats boring
>>2270374
John Green's crash course history.
What is the concept of "Master Race"? How do you define that term?
>>2270332
german people?
>>2270332
yes?
>>2270332
its usaly defined as ''us'' particularly in so far as it relates to ''them''
Which country brought the most destruction to the world since its birth?
>>2270279
Mongolia, Britain+colonies or Germany
>>2270279
America
Shit
Just the American suburbs
And I see clueless burgers I ironically spreg out about how devolping countries are destroying everything and need to be "nuked" or "exterminated" all the time. It's like they don't get that they are the ones paying them to devolp.
>>2270279
The U.S. singlehandedly. We've dropped more bombs than every country on Earth combined several times over. Hell hath no fury like the US Air Force.
Why didn't these regions become independent states?
Also, why were they made "autonomous" republics instead of full republics like Armenia or Ukraine?
>>2270009
Why they should?
They are dependant on cental goverment for food and services.
>>2270009
Russian Slavs and Asians are incapable of independence movements or democratic self-rule.
they are mostly vodka swilling miners and drillers who can't wait to take the train back to Volgograd to fuck their fat wife
Let us discuss Scientism - the idea that the scientific principle can, and should, be applied to everything and used to solve all problems
Here are some of the points most Scientism followers will agree to:
>Science is the only practical and important knowledge.
>All practical and important problems are scientific problems.
>Scientific knowledge should trump all other forms of knowledge when they conflict.
>Certainty is always more important than wonder and mystery.
>Objective knowledge always trumps subjective knowledge.
>Lack of ability to secure scientific knowledge about a particular issue fundamentally makes it a non-issue (or one we should be conservative about).
>Faith not grounded in reality can never be a good thing or in any way useful.
Discuss these points. Make your case for or against Scientism and the application of the scientific principle in ethics, morality, arts, faith and so on.
>>Science is the only practical and important knowledge.
science as in natural science or the systematic method?
>>2269941
Science, as in the following process:
1. Observe
2. Measure
3. Experiment
4. Form theory
5. Test theory
... applied to problems to come to a solution that works the same under the same circumstances, and its outcome can be predicted based on these circumstances every time.
Except for the two World Wars, we never had dogfight again?
There were jet dogfights in Korea
90's MTV have them especially DMX's
>>2269886
Dogfights are romanticised shit that will never happen again.rockets pretty much made machine guns obsolete.
What are some history mysteries that will probably never be solved?
Why Olympic was disguised as Titanic and sunk by a submarine.
Why people think the holocaut happened
>>2269898
Also: why people think that jews existed before 1945.
How were Auxiliaries viewed in the Roman Empire? How did the average legionary/commander treat them?
Specifically asking about the more specialized types of auxiliary.
From what I remember, during the republic the auxiliaries are at best ignored and at worst cowards blamed for routing early on and losing the battle.
Eventually though auxiliaries became the entire army
>>2269806
For purely infantry formations of Auxilia the pay was a fair bit lower than that of a legionary; whereas a cavalry specialist formation would have been paid a bit more depending on quality.
In general the Auxilia seem to have been treated well by their commanders, i think that, due to the support role they played for the legions, if they were ever to abandon a legion or turn traitor the legion could be left vulnerable and as such they were treated reasonably well to avoid this.
>>2270139
Auxiliaries were always at least half of the army from like the 1st century B.C. at the latest. By Augustus 250,000 of the 500,000 strong army was made up of auxiliaries, and 200,000 of the legionaries of non-Italians.