Why did Reagan and Obama both go after Gaddafi?

Reagan: bombed Libya in retaliation for the Lockerbie bombing

Obama: led NATO intervention to support rebellion against Gaddafi, failed to prevent rebels from then slaughtering each oher

>>2268789
Yes, but why did they REALLY

Mess with the best, die like the rest.

>>2268771
Gaddafi was a piece of shit

>>2268816

Destabilization of a region presents the possible opportunity to gain easy influence in it

>>2268816

Oil desu

>>2268816
they invaded sovereign soil going after oil

>>2268816
Gold backed currency

>>2268816
The nose knows

>>2268890
>Reagan
>Obama
>gold backed currency
Do not pick 3, ever.

>>2268771
They wanted to keep Libya as a virtual colony of the US.
>>2268789
Lockerbie and Yvonne Fletcher as well.

Did the us not actually know that the "rebels" werent libyan?

>>2268884
Taking countries is a hobby paid for by the oil lobby.

>>2269044
same as in Iraq, and Afghanistan.

>>2269054
And Ahmadinejad say they coming for Iran.

>>2269059
They only love the rich and how they loathe the poor.

>>2269067
If I say any more they might be at my door

>>2269071
Who the fuck is that staring in my window??

>>2269079
Doing that surveillance on Mister Michael Render

>>2268771
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fny99f8amM
part of this documentary goes into one theory as to why. Basically he was a scapegoat. As an international pariah, he was an easy target.

>>2268816
that was the reason

even if it was about oil or rothschild central banks, Gaddafi's support of terrorism and shenanigans in Chad gave the illuminati the casus belli they needed

>>2268771
Reagan: Gaddafi was literally an autistic 20-something brat ruling a country that lied to fling shit for the heck of it

Obama: Gaddafi tried to introduce a gold currency for Arab countries to sell oil in and use for trade