Man that pope sure ruined Christ's teaching with all his interpretations.
I know, I'll create my own church with my own interpretations, even if they conflict with early church fathers, who cares what the earliest disciples of Christ said
>Protestacucks will defend this
Read Melanchthon & Chemnitz. Most of their works include sections titled "BTW Our Theology is supported not only by the apostolic works but also here's truckloads of patristic quotations. LOL we adhere closer to the church fathers than you silly papists."
>tfw teutonic plebeians rebel against your church even though you only turned it into a whorehouse and fucked your niece
Fast forward and we now have 20000 different protestant denominations in America that only share 1 thing in common: worshipping Israel
Why didn't Hitler just catapult a barrel of cyanide into London?
This thread got me thinking do you suppose conventional urban warfare of the future will have lsd tainting the water supply of a city before an offensive?
>>2334852
M8, if people start ignoring the prohibitions against chemical warfare then I'd worry more about VX than LSD.
That said, it would probably be an extremely effective tactic circunstantially.
>>2334843
catapult tech has been lost since the middle ages. we no longer know how to forge proper catapults.
Do you think you will be going to hell? Explain.
Hell don't real.
>>2334772
Do I think I'm going to go to a magic land of fire when I die? Explain why you would even ask this.
i dunno lol
I wax and wane in my atheism because I just can't deal with how spoopy reality is
I hope not
Is this the most gangster line in the history of history?
>The Orkneyinga Saga suggests the islands were Christianised by Olav Tryggvasson in 995 when he stopped at South Walls on his way from Ireland to Norway. The King summoned the jarl Sigurd the Stout[Notes 7] and said, "I order you and all your subjects to be baptised. If you refuse, I'll have you killed on the spot and I swear I will ravage every island with fire and steel." Unsurprisingly, Sigurd agreed and the islands became Christian at a stroke,[52] receiving their own bishop in the early 11th century.
Wikipedia on the Christianization of Orkneyjar.
>>2334742
man the christianization of the north was such bullshit. I'm still bitter
am i the only morally liberal but economically conservative person here? Do these views collide entirely or can this preferred ideology work?
I'm kind of the opposite of you. Non degenerate social democracy with strict gender norms when?
>>2334329
what aspects of each do you support?
>>2334329
I don't know. But I do know you're the only faggot here.
Hitler possibly fought harder than anyone else in defence of Christianity and the Church. Don't you think it's about time the Catholic Church canonises him?
>>2334305
That's not how it works. You need three miracles to be canonized, Hitler only has two.
>>2334305
YOU SEEM TO BE BOTH, IGNORANT, AND CONFUSED.
1. CATHOLICISM IS JUDEOCHRISTIANITY, NOT CHRISTIANITY.
2. ADOLF HITLER'S CHRISTIANITY WAS NOT JUDEOCHRISTIANITY, BUT AUTHENTIC GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY.
3. ADOLF HITLER'S STRUGGLE, AND THAT OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM, TRANSCENDED CHRISTIANITY, AND IT CERTAINLY WAS ANTITHETICAL TO CATHOLIC JUDEOCHRISTIAN VALUES.
>>2334305
Hitler was a Pagan?
Men from the past
How is democracy any better than a totalitarian government? In a democracy, people "vote" according to their information. If you control the information you control who wins the election. Democracies are essentially a dictatorship of the media, just look at the Murdoch family and their stranglehold over British and Australian politics.
>>2334207
I think your getting totalitarian mixed up with authoritarian. Totalitarian means that the govt has great influence in every aspect of life/society while authoritarian is just more centralized and strict with top down decisions.
totalitarianism is garabage but so is democracy unless you live in a European city state, Switzerland or Iceland.
in a democracy if you have a shit leader you wait a few years and peacefully remove him with an election
if you have a shit dictator your only recourse is to either wait decades until he dies with absolutely no guarantee that the next guy will be any better, or rise up against him which will lead to the deaths of many innocent people, destroy the economy, and throw the entire nation into chaos. And then there's STILL no guarantee that whoever gets into power will be any better.
>>2334207
yeah people are generally starting to figure it out.
Cheers cheeky cunts!
Who killed Edward IV's sons? Was it Richard III or was it that fat Tudor bastard Henry VIII? There's debate over it but no one's sure yet.
Cheers!
Your friendly neighboorhood Anon
I'm 100% probably sure it was Richard
>>2334085
Dickon III already had them declared bastards don't really see a need to kill them at that point.
However if I was a Welshman, named Henry VII, who found people imprisoned with a greater claim...
>>2334148
Well Rich wanted to heir the crown of York, so thats why he maybe did it
Can I really hate a person if they are merely an expression of the genes they carry and the environment that produced them?
>>2334075
Gtfo stirner
>>2334075
Nope
Unless of course you don't realize that that's what they are.
>>2334075
Nope.
Why does pic related exist?
I'm reading about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, and the start of the end really seems to be when some Goths start tearing shit up, starting with the loss at Adrianople in 378.
Anyway, the migration of Goths throughout the west changed the culture and language of what is now Northern Italy, France, and Iberia. But why is Romania still speaking Latin today? How did the language persist despite being on the fringes of the Empire and in the face of invading forces to the north and east? And how as it done so in a way where the Spezia-Rimini line implies it was affected by changes more in line with Central-Southern Italy than any other latin-speaking area?
There was a continuum of Latin based languages in the Balkans Romanian does not exist in a vacuum. The Dalmatian coast for example utilized Dalmatian until the late 19th century.
>>2334039
IIRC they are basically some leftover Dacians who got latinized, then slavized, then latinized again.
The Invasion of goths is an invention.
Why is humanity good?
>>2334026
Because we are humans.
If we cannot see ourselves, in our heart of hearts, as a species that tries to be good, then we cannot be a civilization.
From the first time a group of cavemen decided to band together, to this very day, we have been able to create societies because we can trust in the common good of man. The ability to work together to create lead us to the top of the world, and kept it there. While we cannot always trust each other when we become stronger, and have more to lose, when it comes down to it, there are very few people who ever act in a way that they themselves perceive as evil.
We are humanity. And we believe ourselves to be good. Because without that belief, we could not be the humanity we are today.
>>2334026
We come to earth to try to become good.
>>2334026
What is good?
What do most /his/torians do when they want a break from history and politics?
>>2333993
Retreat to other hobbies, such as literature and cooking.
Direct injections of moe to the veins.
>>2333993
watch porn
>"""rules""" of war
I'll use poison gas against you. What are you gonna do about it huh?
*hangs u from your own statue*
mess with the best, die like the rest...kiddo
return the favor i suppose. the international guidelines are mostly for the benefit of civilians & PoWs, it really doesn't restrict a nation from being able to wage total war, most poison or nerve gas has a negligible military value
Why the fuck does this person shitpost here every single day with that dumb anime picture
Redpill me on Dorians and Myceneans.
All I know is that the 2 ethnicities formed classical greek culture.
Were myceneans IndoEuropeans?
Were Macedonians Dorians?
Is classical greek developed from Dorian or Mycenean languages more?
Do we have any records or artefacts of pure Dorian culture and language?
Were Dorians in any way related to other paleobalkanic peoples north of Greeces, Like Thracians, Phrygians, or Illyrians?
sorry for typos
>>2333704
The term "the Greeks" does not refer to a single group of people but to a varied group of many people's joined together by language alone.
However since these people's all spoke a form of Greek they're all therefore Indo-European since that too is a linguistic designation and not a racial one
>>2333724
weren't myceneans and minoans both pre IE?