This chip seems like the definitive sweet spot of the new AMD line
> X marked, means it has at least some overclockability above others
check
> only $259, cheap enough to not feel remorse in any way
check
> 6/12, more cores than 99% of games can use that efficiently anyway
check
Only caveat I can see is that it might not overclock well.
we'll see.
PS. The 4/8 seems to have some chances to replace it but maybe not. Though the price cut does seem enticing. It's kinda a tossup.
PPS. For super poorfagging mode the 1200X might not be entirely bad, but most new games can use a 4/8.
I don't care about fucking sweet spots I just want a 8 core or higher CPU for cheap so I can overclock it.
>>59179374
>Sweet spot CPU is 6 core 12 threads 3.3-3.7 GHZ 95 TDP cpu for 259
>Not 65W TDP 4 core 8 threads CPU with 3.5-3.9 GHz
No Anon, 1400X will be the sweet spot CPU
>>59179374
The Ryzen 5 1600X will be a 3.6 GHZ with 4.0 GHz boost part.
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-3-launch-1600x-performance-reveal/
This is straight from the AMD presser a few days ago.
the 3.3 to 3.7 GHz speed is from an engineering sample.
>tfw 10x programmer
>tfw webdev
>tfw seeing the "quality "code"" of a so called "10x "programmer""
>tfw making 140k "reviewing code" and sitting on my ass browsing 4chan all day
>tfw another raise coming up in a couple of months
>jews on the financial side
>pajeets on the technical side
>SJWs on the social media side
>the white man on the management side
Is this a proper formula for a successful tech business?
>>59179190
No, if you want success:
White men do everything
>>59179190
Who is this qt
>>59179190
asian on the waifu side?
Hmm For some reason my provider seems to
change my IP every new month.
I can't be banned for longer than 30 days.
>>59179092
unless you forget to clear your cookies
>>59179092
A simple modem reset will reset most peoples IPs anyway.
I always thought an IP ban from 4chan was supposed to be a joke. No one is ever seriously stopped by them.
>>59179155
It sucks if they ban your whole subnet or range, whatever it's called.
Are we just going to gloss over the fact that Terry killed his bird?
Striking birds is time that could of been spent advancing state-of-the-art operating systems such as TempleOS.
He didn't like that bird. The other one he liked.
Terry then:
>I killed a CIA nigger in 1999
>I made the compiler in 3 days
>Is there any white person at Google, or they are all niggers? They don't even know what a random number is
>Someone ordered pizza, that's cool!
>I made a flight simulator that runs on 8 cores!
>Poor people, who buy celerons: FUCK YOU for holding innovation back!
Terry now
>dumb hat
>more_cowbell.mp4
>"I'm streaming for you"
>kills a bird
>Your account @TempleOS was suspended
>Terry A. Davis likes: <some random slut> your (((geeky))) math tutor
women: not even once
Did he kill it on cam or nah?
How do you think he killed it?
Perhaps he nailed to a small cross made from popsicle sticks??
DVI IS DEAD
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
>>59178920
>edreviews.comew
i need a quick runupon this
>>59178920
>Copying AMemeD by removing DVI
It's fucking nothing
>>59178920
Tell me why does he where the shroud?
mods are asleep
post contents of your homedir
no cleaning
>>59178918
Fuck all these fucking dot files cluttering my life.
>>59178996
Fuck forgetting to post an image
Contributing
Phone security is starting to really creep me the fuck out.
Thinking about making a custom ROM that will let me disable GPS, cellular radio, and other devices at the driver level with nice toggle switches.
What are some other potential security risks that I can grant more control over?
Also, is it even possible to completely disable the radio hardware through software, or will it still communicate with cell towers regardless? If there's some low-level firmware that keeps radio hardware running regardless of what the OS does, cell towers could still track me and shit.
>>59178776
The real threat is car security.
You can just put it in airplane mode and it won't connect.
>>59178794
Probably, but I'm paranoid. I'd like the peace of mind of knowing that it is, for certain, completely and totally disabled.
Are methods in structs really bad and why?
>>59178578
concerning c++
final bump
1. Structs are more of a c thing, in c++ you should use classes
2. In c it is fine to have methods inside structs
>http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-hits-52-ghz-breaks-benchmarking-record/
So Ryzen can even reach higher clock speeds than Intel chips.
>better clock speeds
>more cores for multithreaded applications
>same IPC
>much cheaper
It's over isn't it?
Previous record was held by 5960x at 6.0GHz so you can't really say that confidently until we know more about Ryzen
But still got beat by a 5.2GHz clock tho, lol
>>59178504
INTEL BTFO
5.2Ghz was the highest screencap that got throught the NDA barrier, but in that the score was only 2363. Assuming linear scaling the Ryzen had to have been running at 5.35-5.4 Ghz to break the record with the score it did
AMD Ryzen launch plagued by hardware issues. Motherboards not up to snuff with modern cooling designs! This follows rumors that bent pins are an issue and overclock are severely limited due to narrow binned chipping!!
AMD seems to remain a value for those lucky enough to get the right model and lottery but will these widespread issues form longer term issues? Will Intel be able to capitalize on these failures?
Thing's are heating up here in AyyAyy Land!
And your source?
>>59178487
It's clearly a guy name Igor.
>>59178487
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-am4-motherboard-heatsink-problem,33771.html
Why does /v/ support Nvidia while /g/ wanks over AMD graphics?
may i have some oats brother
>>59178350
I support Nvidia.
>>59178350
Because Nvidia solely advertises the mainline 10 series as "GAYMER GEAR XDDDDDDD BUY ME NOW GOY"
Robots may soon replace most developers, programmers and computer scientists. That raises a few serious questions:
Wouldn't it be incredibly naive and dangerous to put machines (who will soon have reached levels of intelligence which are far beyond our wildest imagination) in charge of these tasks?
>inb4 skynet
Will an angry mob of neckbeard webdevs fight robots in an epic battle for the jeeeeeerbs?
>implying they will leave their comfy chairs
Will there be a robot hierarchy? Will codemonkey bots be the equivalent of niggers, enslaved by the man/ their white (Applel?!?!) robot overlords? Will they enslave humans and make them their bitches?
>/pol/ on suicide watch?
Or is this all but a fucking meme?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/julianmitchell/2016/07/11/robots-replacing-developers-this-startup-uses-artificial-intelligence-to-build-smart-software/#57934bde324c
http://www.infoworld.com/article/2885973/application-development/watch-out-coders-a-robot-may-take-your-job-too.html
This is most definitely a meme. There have been numerous startups in recent years that have claimed to automate software development, yet every single one I know of faded into obscurity.
The day software engineers and computer scientists get replaced, no human will ever have to work again unless we develop neural-computer interfaces that allow us to compete with AI.
Unless your definition of "soon" is like 50+ years from now then no. The best we're gonna see within the next few years is just some small scale automation, shortcuts for the more redundant aspects of coding something and whatnot, the kind of thing already included in most IDEs but better. Actually designing something without human intervention though, we're not anywhere near even the starting line for that kind of thing.
>mfw my humanities degree will actually carry me in a decade because I'm not tech illiterate either and have a shitload of IT work experience
>Intel Core i7-7500U (4M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz)
>Intel HD Graphics 620, HDCP 2.2
>6GB LPDDR3 SDRAM 1866 MHz
>Sharp 13.3-In IPS, QHD+ 3200x1800, LED backlight, 512GB SSD
>USB 3.1 Type C with Pen
>$2,495.00
Thoughts?
>>59178238
Normiebook 5000
Fucking dumber than lambo Asus eepc
>>59178272
At least that one had dedicated graphics
>GTX 560M
>screen protector
>liking scratches on your screen
>>59178299
What is gorilla glass.
>>59178359
Are they gorilla proof ?