>http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-7 -1800x-hits-52-ghz-br

Previous record was held by 5960x at 6.0GHz so you can't really say that confidently until we know more about Ryzen
But still got beat by a 5.2GHz clock tho, lol

>>59178504
INTEL BTFO

5.2Ghz was the highest screencap that got throught the NDA barrier, but in that the score was only 2363. Assuming linear scaling the Ryzen had to have been running at 5.35-5.4 Ghz to break the record with the score it did

>>59178483
>look ma, i'm overclockin' it
pour some liquid nitrogen through your ear, faggot

>>59178504
the ryzen hasnt been released yet. still havent seen crazy enthusiast builds getting it as high as possible without blowing up. could break its own record

Still just pointless rumours.

Waiting for reviews from reputable sources.

I'd actually be interested to know how many people have use for this. honestly don't know much about the market but I assume that most users don't really do anything that requires a CPU like this.
even the 1700x seems to be very expensive while offering almost no benefit over a 150-200$ CPU. am I wrong?

>>59178483
I'm really hoping that this is the long-overdue bitch slap that Intel needs. I really really hope.

Ryzen would be a great name for a bitch slap product. Please God let it be so.

>>59178793
What?

The 1700x performs better than 6900K at less than half the cost.

The newest AMD CPUs are cheaper AND faster than Intel's.

>>59178793
Depends entirely on what you do with your computer.

Is it just for browsing and shit? A $100 CPU is pretty much overkill for that already.

Are you streaming, recording, editing videos or music, playing games, running a server, running simulations, or doing a bunch of things like that all at once? Then you'll probably want some high-end CPU's.

>>59178812
>I'd actually be interested to know how many people have use for this. honestly don't know much about the market but I assume that most users don't really do anything that requires a CPU like this.
this is going to go down just like faildozer

just wait and see faggots

File: 1470197340028.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>59178795
Yea, so we can buy intel CPUs cheaper KEK

>>59178483
>ryzen-7-1800x-hits-52-ghz
Fuck, that a lot fo Ghzs. My 2500k can only hit 4.7

>>59178838
I just like to see the underdog get a bone every now and then. I'm still fully satisfied with my i7 3770, and my FX 8350.

>>59178856
i feel ya. i built a 7700k to replace my main. one week or so before the leaks started, lol

my secondary is an old core 2 duo box with a 4850

im actually to a point where i can actually use a secondary box beyond browsing. i need another box that can be used for quick photoshop and lightroom edits. sure enough the core 2 is decent enough at 1080 but moving into more premiere usage... well more corez!

cant wait to look at this in 2 months and see how everthing stacks and then get a proper 6-8 core.

im really hoping amd has a compelling 8c int he 1800x so i can side my 7700k to my second box. otherwise im getting a 1700 for the second and using it for rendering across the network as needed

>>59178483
does that cpu support 4k netflix? this is kind of a deal breaker for me.

File: frank-vincent-5.jpg (30KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 300x300px

6700k dropped $70
Thanks ricen, you piece of shit

>>59178793
i encode chinese cartoons bdmv on a g3258 4.3GHz.
i could use moar coars.
should have bought an athlon 860k instead of falling for this shit.