[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 185. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: 1486194582453.png (492KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
1486194582453.png
492KB, 800x600px
for digital, how many megapixels is enought. i know that 16 is 4k so im guessing thats all i need
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
4K is 8 megapixels my man.

As for how many is enough? There is no limit. The more, the merrier. Megapixels are one thing, pixel pitch (how small the actual sensels/physical pixels are in real life) is another. There is a practical limit to pixel pitch, where you start getting rapidly diminishing returns because the sensor out-resolves the glass. I would also reckon that the physical limit is only around 200% smaller than today's smallest pixel pitch sensors, since you start getting pixels that are physically smaller than the wavelength of visible light (we're at 1300 nanometers, but red light is 700 nanometers). I could be wrong about that last part though because I'm an idiot college dropout artist and not a physicist, imaging scientist, or optical engineer.
>>
>>3030741
no it makes sense, if you have pixels smaller than the wavelength of light then you would start seeing colourshifts when viewed at 1:1.

File: fishdrop.jpg (473KB, 1000x718px) Image search: [Google]
fishdrop.jpg
473KB, 1000x718px
Anyone take series of photos and group them together? I just made my first, only two pictures, didn't think of the idea until after the fact

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4699
Image Height3372
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution28 dpcm
Vertical Resolution28 dpcm
Image Created2017:02:28 01:47:40
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height718
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
There was a dude who used to post on here with one of those half frame olympus pen's. I havent seen his stuff in a while though.
>>
i watched a lecture given be Elliot Erwitt and I liked this idea a lot so next time i'm out shooting i will try to intentionally focus on a series of pictures

File: NYC151414.jpg (190KB, 500x752px) Image search: [Google]
NYC151414.jpg
190KB, 500x752px
>street photography
when will this meme end?
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
When they realize they are themselves and not Bruce Gilden.
>>
>>3029999
Gilden is a meme photographer anyway
>>
>>30230000

File: cucked.jpg (195KB, 1365x2048px) Image search: [Google]
cucked.jpg
195KB, 1365x2048px
How's this one?
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3029957
Reminds me of those bullying/loner stock photos
>>
>>3029957
Nikon is lonely
Canon gets the pussy

File: heart gif.gif (1MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
heart gif.gif
1MB, 480x480px
Ok so, stupid question here.

I've been always a fan of video editing and post production but recently because of my new job i've started to get interested in film and photography

I recently got a rebel t5i which was very affordable (200 usd) and would like to write a good script and take some shots.

Now, problem is, i don't have any experience on this (writting ideas or stories), i do have experience using cameras but not that much.

I don't know if this is just worth it at my age because i work with guys with the same age as me who literally started scripting and filming years ago and they have much more knowledge about composition, lights, etc.

Is it possible for a 23 year old man to become good at this with many many effort and hardwork?

Or is it worthless?

>pic related: the only things i feel i don't suck for
5 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
shameful self bump
>>
File: get.gif (971KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
get.gif
971KB, 480x360px
>>3029922

Don't be a faggot OP, start reading, writing and filming whatever you want to
>>
Anyone else?

File: biggestgearfagever.jpg (278KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]
biggestgearfagever.jpg
278KB, 1080x1349px
Alright /p/, which one of you faggots is this?
4 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_5139.png (270KB, 730x599px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5139.png
270KB, 730x599px
>That many bodies yet still uses zooms
>>
>Mobile Suit Gearfag
>>
>>3029191
>nikonfags
KEK

File: 2017-02-26_01-15-33.jpg (944KB, 1600x1180px) Image search: [Google]
2017-02-26_01-15-33.jpg
944KB, 1600x1180px
When I export out of Lightroom, these "lightlines" appear in the images and I don't know what's causing them. I'd appreciate it if anyone knows how to get rid of them, thanks!
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
The background moire? You sure that wasn't there before?

Try exporting in a larger file size, that could help. JPEG has a bit of a tendency to create this. But I think LR still doesn't support BPG or WEBP or FLIF plus wherever you publish might not accept these anyhow, right?

Using the noise reduction and sharpening liberally as some JPEG pre-processor of sorts could also could do the trick.
>>
>>3029184
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_pattern
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliasing

twp things you could try
1. export at the original resolution, or at an integer multiple
2. in your export settings, turn off "sharpen for...(print, screen, etc)"

let me know if this doesn't fix your problem. i'm interested in this, because lightroom shouldn't be making these artifacts.
>>
>>3029184
looks like a mix of aliasing and a grid coming from bad debayering

File: 7c1ff69f5c-1486825491202.jpg (9KB, 232x300px) Image search: [Google]
7c1ff69f5c-1486825491202.jpg
9KB, 232x300px
what is this effect called? i know it has "awareness" in the name
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3029132
content aware scaling
>>
content aware satan
>>
>>3029132
It's call total shit.

File: tmp_1302-e-2075581176.jpg (602KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_1302-e-2075581176.jpg
602KB, 1000x563px
I have noticed that a lot of these threads are people asking others to critisize their work. Any craft requires good assesment of one's own work.

>post a peice you shot and like
>Critique your ownn work for faults
>Then you can discuss criticism you receive from other people.

Here is mine
>The shot is under exposed
>I over estimated the capabilities of the sensor I was using. This makes horrible artifacting.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLG Electronics
Camera ModelVS986
Sensing MethodNot Defined
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:02:25 14:40:13
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating150
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.42 mm
Comment FM0 FC000010000:zzzzzz0 6 ca 078043874441663838014c0 bac 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 12 0 0 1b 0 0 0 0 0
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height563
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Altitude0.00 m
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3028832
You forgot to say your photo is mindless garbage
>>
>>3028852
Now you post a picture
>>
>>3028852
Yeah, I shot it going colors are pretty. I could have turned my brain on and made something meaningful. It's desktop material for people who don't look at their desktop.

File: IMG_1790.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1790.jpg
2MB, 3264x2448px
Hey anons, I'm new to Digital Shooting (!2 Years on Film) and I'm looking for a Program to edit my photos. Free is good, however it also has to Transform RAW files into JPEG. Took Me two Memory cards before I figured it out. Anyways share what you use and what you can suggest. Thanks in advance

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot S5 IS
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Lens Size6.00 - 72.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.01
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2013:04:26 16:13:42
Exposure Time2 sec
F-Numberf/2.7
ISO Speed Rating80
Lens Aperturef/2.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length6.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeUnknown
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessNormal
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeSingle
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingSuperfine
Macro ModeMacro
Subject Distance0.120 m
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed149
Image Number104-1790
3 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: P1010735 (1).jpg (1MB, 4560x4560px) Image search: [Google]
P1010735 (1).jpg
1MB, 4560x4560px
>>3027656
I use RAW Therapee. It's free and I very much like it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePanasonic
Camera ModelDMC-G7
Camera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.0-r1-gtk3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4560
Image Height1844
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Exposure Time1/25 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length42.00 mm
>>
>>3027656
I have been using Capture 1 for years and now it comes free with Sony cameras. Any money that doesn't go to the Adobe Mafia is money well spent

File: Taylor-Marie-McCormick-3.52.jpg (93KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]
Taylor-Marie-McCormick-3.52.jpg
93KB, 650x650px
Hi there,

I'm looking for a good lightweight camera strap for my 5dmk2, mostly for travelling, long walks, a bit of hiking, what would you suggest ?
I sweat quite a lot so something that don't heat up my neck too much would be great.

Also, i'm looking to buy a backpack mount aswell like the Peak design capture pro v2, is it any good ?
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
up
>>
Look at imostraps
>>
>>3027516
>lightweight camera strap

The fuck? Is half an ounce too heavy?

File: 20170223_162008.jpg (743KB, 1280x880px) Image search: [Google]
20170223_162008.jpg
743KB, 1280x880px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BeX0O19v7s
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3027449
cancer.
>>
Fuck off with your channel promotion

File: untitled_by_menoevil-d6c7k5s.jpg (189KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]
untitled_by_menoevil-d6c7k5s.jpg
189KB, 700x700px
Hello /p/. I've just finished my first album and have a concept for an album cover that i wouldn't mind running past yall to see if its doable and any advice on how it could work.

Here is the concept

Its a side on wide profile shot of a shear cliff, a person (female) wearing a flowing dress of some kind tied to a chair and blind folded with their back to the cliff drop and the back two chair legs teetering on the edge. I'm standing in front of the her with my foot on the seat of the chair pushing them back over the edge of the cliff with my leg as the chair leans back about to fall so it seems unclear if im pushing it in the shot or holding the chair still in the shot. That is the basic concept.

I would probably like to do it on location instead of studio unless the photo shopping green screen is high level enough to make it work.

What does /p/ think about this concept? any pointers would be apreesh.
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
You don't save someone from falling with your foot.

Maybe your hands should be tied behind your back as well.
>>
>>3026544
Let me get this straight....

You want to tie a girl to a chair and teeter her off the edge of a cliff?

Yeah, go for it, what could go wrong?

Also what city do you live in? I want to check the news over the next few days

File: L0000068-0001.jpg (279KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]
L0000068-0001.jpg
279KB, 1000x600px
Sup, I'm searching for the best low budget wide angle lens for my Nikon D7100 (DX).
I'm thinking about something mostly for landscape photos and >maybe< some indoors (small rooms).
Fisheyes are a no-no.

I was thinking about:
Tamron: 10-20mm
Sigma 10-20mm
Tokina: 11-16mm

or
Samyang 14mm
Nikkor 18-105 (it's the kit lens)

Any suggestions which one of those is the best? Or maybe you have other in mind?
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Bought a sigma 10-20 for 240 and I absolutely love it. One of my favorite lenses honestly.
>>
Tokina 11-16. Super sharp, f2.8, 77mm filter thread, excellent build. There's samples in the Sucralose Thread shot on a D7000 with that lens.
>>
Opteka 6.5mm f/3.5 (re-branded samyang 8mm 3.5).
This lens produces a stereographic projection, so you obtain easily defishable images to create 180 degree rectilinear landscapes.
For the same price you have a real fisheye just for shits and giggles.

>160$ online
>Very sharp if you know how to handle apperture and focus manually
>Metallic body and mount
>Keeps contrast and flares under control like a boss without fancy coatings, very good lens design.

Also hyperfocal distance is 0.4m at f/8 so you can just leave it permanently like that.

File: canon-slr-eos-rebel-t5.jpg (34KB, 650x450px) Image search: [Google]
canon-slr-eos-rebel-t5.jpg
34KB, 650x450px
Worth to buy this camera on 270 bucks??

Help me, i can decide in a camera :(
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
here is your help: kill yourself.
>>
>>3024792
Tip: post in gear thread. Delete this shit.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.