Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1599. page

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2017/Bills/House/PDF/H69v0.pdf

>Link to HB 69

File: 1490720365674.jpg (40KB, 424x185px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 424x185px

>>33467739
Bump

Pull the classic "pools kill more people" argument

Go kill yourself for making this pointless thread
Sage in all fields

>>33467396
Let it go

Sig paid a metric asston to get that contract. Theres very little we can do about it now.

File: sig twins.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>33467396
>Neither does your sig
but that's wrong you retard

>>33467090
didnt know it would be a steyr commercial
>sniper rifle
my autism is going nuts right now

>>33467090
lily has autism

>>33467090
She's ugly, most 'gun related girls' are.

>>33466961
You fucked up.
Next time post picture orientated the right way.

Yes, Fuck pigs.
Now go out and get 29 more

File: cuddle.webm (1MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x480px

You did an excellent job at culling the hog population that is threatening our entire ecosystem.

>>33466957

Even as the russians were raping them, you will never ever ever make something of kraut quality.

Also open bolt is no

They're not so cheap when you have to actually pay your factory workers, Same reason why nobody makes nuggets on the cheap.

>>33466743
They would run out of torpedoes before they made significant impact to allied shipping, and advances would be made in ASW. You'd find the computers and other onboard systems would be more useful to their war effort than their combat capabilities.

>>33466743
Germany reads about how they lose horribly and calls off the war. Instead they reverse engineer what they can to gain economic power in the new timeline.

>>33466787

>They would run out of torpedoes before they made significant impact to allied shipping

Nonsense. You wouldn't waste high-tech torpedoes on merchant ships. You'd use them on battleships and aircraft carriers so that the German surface fleet can raid the Atlantic unopposed.

>>33466716
screw around with blackpowder or buy an illegal gun

>>33466716
They shitpost more to make up for it. Most bait threads are made by bongs.

This came up to me today, wtf would a UK fag do if shtf?

can't even use a butter knife gotta get licence for that.

File: Capture.jpg (101KB, 1028x608px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1028x608px

US Navy Kfir

also

USMC Kfir* fucking spell check

File: f_5.png.jpg (26KB, 1279x515px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1279x515px

MiG-17 still going strong.

>>33466785
North Korean>?

Yeah. Shoot it once in the head. A .22 will bounce around the skull and shred the brain.

>>33466585
>you will never own a full retard .22lr M1919

>>33466616

You can get an american 180 though

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv8YqHwZooU

>>33466580

No, not really, long range artillery and aviation will make short work of it. It can serve its purpose against the average african militia however.

>>33466606
What sort of structure would stand up to artillary and air attacks?

>>33466580
Hmm, I wonder how nice it would look when the artillery finally collapsed the underground facilities and they slowly began to fill with water.

you had well over 35 minutes to make a new thread kys

>>33466513
>>33466513
>>33466513

File: IMG_9261.jpg (37KB, 750x341px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 750x341px

>>33466540
Yeah fuck fluffy

Little cunt lives off attention

>>33466654
>shipping that to CA
how long before your gun gets confiscated now?

>>33466518
The Navy had TOPGUN up and running by 1972 and Linebacker, so they had pilots who had not only been through the couslrse, but also had spread their knowledge of dissimilar ACM. The Air Force wanted to fix the terrible bombing accuracy experienced in Rolling Thunder, and never did develop anything such as TOPGUN until after the war.

But to answer your question, the gun was prevalent in kill counts thanks to F-105 drivers who only had them to contend with MiGs. Later missiles that worked better also reduced the need for a gun on the F-4, as it was mostly the early days that saw the need for a gun. However, Phantoms claimed around 14 MiGs with guns, while all Thud MiG kills were gun
kills. The F-8 claimed only 4 gun kills out of 19.

File: Phantom Kills Vietnam.png (29KB, 433x458px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 433x458px

>>33466518
Best I have is pic related.

But yeah, the Navy never added guns to their Phantoms, but instead started up TOPGUN. Their kill/loss ratios ended up being consistently higher than the USAF, even without guns.

>>33466657

That's perfect anon, thanks.
>even without guns
Yeah, that's what I understood the situation to be as well. Problem is, I can't prove it. But that table's a good start.
>>33466642
So the F-105's were used as like, ground attack or something, and had to use their guns as a self defence weapon on the way too/back from their target?

how many times do we have to go over this with you

>>33466540
>>33466540
>>33466540

File: Resized_20170328_150551.jpg (724KB, 2365x1330px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 2365x1330px

In

File: IMG_0566.jpg (3MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2448x3264px

>>33466513
qb late again

File: biden.gif (598KB, 400x236px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 400x236px

See'n that dust.

File: 1470949175328.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 854x480px

>>33466466
Slow-mo closeups of automatics with the action open.

File: 1486247705254.jpg (134KB, 1024x686px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1024x686px

Gigantic scopes. Bonus points if it's a video scope.

That's the green one. I'd know it anywhere.

It can look really far, if that helps

>>33466420
man, with a scope that big i bet you could see the moon