>glock is unsafe because it doesn't have an external safety
Neither does your sig
Go kill yourself for making this pointless thread
Sage in all fields
>>33467396
Let it go
Sig paid a metric asston to get that contract. Theres very little we can do about it now.
>>33467396
>Neither does your sig
but that's wrong you retard
>>33467451
Glock himself is actually pretty much an asshole if anecdotal reports are to be believed. He is of the opinion that his gun is perfect and getting the OK to modify it in order to cater to specific customers is said to be very hard. Gotta love the man even more if that's true.
>>33467663
Thats because he's correct in thinking that.
The new glock that was issued to the FBI with their requested changes failed on some tests.
Keep in mind that this is coming from the same retarded agency that requested the .40S&W, only to switch back to 9x19.
>>33467832
>The new glock that was issued to the FBI with their requested changes failed on some tests.
where are pics of the Gen5? Or should I really say Gen 2.5
Oh sure but when i suggest removing the trigger safety everyone loses their minds
>>33467852
Here
They went full retard and demanded they remove the grooves and add a enlarged magwell. I know theres at least 1-2 more changes but it didn't satisfy apparently.
>>33467852
>>33467832
yeah, but most of these changes were cosmetic. you ahve to wonder who fucked up to make the guns unreliable and what happened. it's not compareable to the safety-P320 by Sig which is a major alteration. ofc, a cross bolt trigger safety and a thumb safety have previously been tried in Glocks too but one can only imagine the Hitler-esque rants Glock must have given...
>>33467832
>Thats because he's correct in thinking that.
I agree. The Glock is by far the best gun you can have.
>>33467873
are the slides on the 17M still flying off?
>>33467873
I thought they demanded that the thumb-rest/"match target" thumbpad be removed as well? And that looks like its got interchangable backstraps as well?
>>33467901
I can see major teething issues from going ambi-slide release. and wtf? only a 2-pin lower?
another glock thread
kys
>>33467439
Careful about saying that you are saging, I've literally been banned twice for "abusing the report system and using sage in all fields" (reporting off topic garbage, saging and saying that I was)
Mods are fucking dumb jizzlickers
>>33467999
This
Regardless of the threads topic, the mods for /k/ are utter trash.
>>33467396
Op here I wasn't mainly ripping on sigs. I'm just sick of the logic that some people have: "double action is my safety" and then proceed to shit on the glock about being unsafe for cc or duty
Also the full size barrel on the p320 looks good but the 3.5" barrel makes me want to vomit
>External Safety
>FNP .45
Nope.
>.454 casull
Maximum nope.
Safeties are for people that don't practice good handling proceedures.
>>33467999
It's literally against the rules to say you are reporting someone.
>>33468667
reported
Fuck safeties
>>33467396
Fuck off with your MUH SAFETY bullshit, it's literally a whogivesafuck feature and I like safeties on my rifle and 1911
sage