Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 795. page

>>8720046
Pretty much any first world country could do it in fairly short order. In the case of Australia, Canada, Germany and Italy I believe there are even arrangements in place for sharing of nuclear weapons from the cold war days.

The major difficulties with obtaining nuclear weapons are fuel enrichment and explosive lensing. The latter can probably be figured out by a couple of grad students and a computer these days. The former tends to be fairly expensive and requires either breeder reactors (for Pu239) or lots of centrifuges (for U235). Centrifuges are used anyways for refining raw uranium into energy grade uranium, but getting weapons' grade (90%ish) is expensive as fuck and will never go unnoticed. As for breeder reactors, those are fairly easy to notice too. So basically - any industrialized nation with some nuclear infrasctructure and access to uranium ore can make nukes, but everyone else will find out about this quickly.

>>8720046
They have the "japan option"

>>8720086
If you already have power reactors then you have plutonium (though production rate is small and extraction may intrude on reactor operation time)

It didn't create any energy, it accumulated energy in its core and blew up eventually.

>>8720011
There was no "creation" of the universe. It has always existed and will always exist. However it's form may change wildly. To say there is a beginning or an end is to believe in magic.

>>8720021
>>8720011

Nobody knows. Dont be tempted to give an answer.

He wouldn't make it out, he'd eventually settle at the core.

>>8720000
well if there's no core then all the mass is gone and with it the gravity

so depending on initial he'd just float or come out the other end and keep going

>>8720064
He wouldn't make it out, he'd eventually settle at the core.

Because I don't want to

>>8719817
I know a lot of intelligent people that also know how to play at least one instrument, in my case, I'm just not really into playing music

>It can get girls too
Just guitar

>>8719824
>>8719827
>>8719834
Music theory isn't even that hard. It's simple physics.

Where did they operate? What was the procedure?

>>8719784
They removed a benign glioma tumor the size of a quarter in the left frontal lobe. Relative to other brain surgeries this one was much lower risk since it was easy to get to and not malignant.

Interesting. Take a bunch of psychoactive drugs. If they don't work, you'll know there is a problem with your brain chemistry. If you find yourself tripping balls, that would be a good time to do some contemplation on your issue. Psychotherapy works.

>>8719655
Which side of R&D are you more interested in?

>>8719723

Still not entirely sure. My problem is I have varied interests that don't really fall in one easy category.

I guess I find bio-engineering to be the main interest, but not sure what aspect to go with

Molecular genetics is going to explode soon

>>8719615
not at all, open doors belong to social people. As long as you polite and he agreed you're good. These people are there to serve you, take advantage of them but don't be rude about it. You offered him an interesting distraction and for all you know it gave him a research interest or idea.

>>8719615
Probably not, in my experience your professors what to help you. If he was busy I'm sure he would have said so when you first asked for help.

It's a Schroedingers Cat kind of situation, really.
You asked him if he could help you. He could've refused, but chose not to, so it's on him anyways.

Could you have been more considerate beforehand to look if it's his office hours or not?
Neeeh, maybe...

But at the end of the day what truly decides it, is how you carry yourself in this situation while coming at the man with a request. You did well, apparently.

And ultimately it would be him that gets to decide whether it was a dick move or not. So no way of telling until you try it. Therefore, Schroedinger.

>>8719541
>define "1"
More like "Define 1, + and ="

you could make the argument that 1+1=13,170.6422, in physics if you use the Saros number to represent 1, there is nothing say what the 1 represents so there is no way of proving that i am wrong.

BASIC MATH BTFO

>>8719541
1 = 6, so 1 + 1 = 12

File: 1484429971227.jpg (191KB, 800x975px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 800x975px

bump

File: 1485887870903.jpg (81KB, 640x632px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 640x632px

another bump

File: 1461350700541.jpg (365KB, 906x1366px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 906x1366px

Your poor mental health has nothing to do with science.

K i l l
Y o u r
S e l f

Why the fuck does /sci/ is so fascinated with this "oh but it is genetics" thing? Are you searching for a excuse for just being racists and assholes?

>>8719289

Because this aspect is completely stifled in academia and taboo, and this is a counter cultural website where those kinds of things thrive in the domain of totally free, anonymous speech.

>>8719289
is it wrong to be interested in this topic?

I don’t think being interested in it makes me a racist if I don’t use it for racist purposes.

>So what would happen ifl someone encodes the common virus with pedo porn?

A virus changes every time it copies itself. I'm sure storing info would be one off read-write shit.

>>8719185
So if I download some pedo porn to my computer and change a couple of bits of data, it's not kiddy porn any more?

File: 1478082863654.jpg (119KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 960x960px

>>8719237
You could write out a mathematical formula to change this image into child porn.


Actually, if you would write a program that would generate a picture of a 500x500 pixel image with every possible pixel combination (e.g. brute force style)
It would output the faces of every human that ever exist or will ever exist. But also your parents having sex, or you being at the receiving end of a bukake.

huh, that really activates those neurons.

>>8718937
That cover looks like the cover of a fucking kid's book. Find a book fit for a man for fucks sake.

>>8718937
Feynmann's lecture are a good start for physic in general

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fV9ajE8c4TI&feature=youtu.be


Bad book from a libtard idiot.

What about computer engineering

>>8718884
its to hard

>>8718884

Have fun programming a generic Java/.NET application.

What is your IQ?

>>8718875
>Precalculus
Are you in fucking middle school? This website is 18+, brainlet.

>>8718875
top fucking kek

I have.

>>8718651
Same

Science is like wikileaks, drip drip drip works best