Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 567. page

File: 9780135708545-us-300.jpg (21KB, 300x421px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x421px

>>8882317
great news. most of mechanical engineering actually boils down to straight algebra. the tougher problems require SOME calculus, but more than likely you are going to be using some sort of numerical method instead.

>2 stroke engine or something.

you can easily get through pic related with only some working knowledge of thermo and calc 1 shit.

engineering is 90% intuition and feels. the math is there to optimize and cover your ass in court.

>>8882340
I came here to post this.
Wildberger would agree on this, it is reals.

File: rk_roadster_1024x1024.jpg (69KB, 648x518px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 648x518px

>>8882340
I was going into this thinking I was going to need so much overhead knowledge. I didn't know that it was going to be that straight forward. Thank you anon.

The sun is a nuclear explosion you fucking brainlet.

>>8882140

>nuclear explosion
>doesn't burn out

Try again

>>8882137
Err I think if you measure then intensity of the light, you get the power of the sun, so then you just compare that to the numerous answers of how powerful a nuclear bomb is

>>8881386

It would take more energy to turn them into oil then you'd get out of it.

because thats disgusting are you serious?

I dont want to be the fuel in some degenerate's car.

Fuck off underageb&

>>8881357
=1 is indeterminate

>>8881357
[math] \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac1{n^2}[/math] converges, [math]\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac1n[/math] does not.

File: IMG_4566.jpg (505KB, 424x550px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 424x550px

if you got a shovel and hollowed out Earth, and then went inside, the net gravitational force on you would average out to zero.

>>8881140
Hold on, so you are saying we would not [i]experience gravity[/i] but the Newton law tells us that in reality there are still gravitational forces on us? Then why can we not hollow out other things for anti-gravity? What's to stop someone from hollowing out a huge boulder deep underground and floating inside it?

>>8881140
FROM the earth. What about the sun? What about the supermassive black hole in the centre of the galaxy?

tl;dr - no; if you're in the universe, you experience gravity

with "maths I will need" I mean stuff I will need to use at university

do the advanced courses or its not worth your time

>>8881073
Yeah, I'm trying to get into all of them except the "math revision" for the people who just need a passing grade in maths

>>8880806
Yes, it is. Why does it bother you?

>>8880809
Who's word are you taking for it? I can disprove it, just tell me the second last step of one first. It bothers me because I can't find real teleportation.

>>8880839
do you even know any physics you faggot?

>>8880794
It could LITERALLY be anything.

OTP is not breakable, and without any knowledge about what a system you are using to encrypt everything is equally likely.

>>8880794
I think I have a clue though I don't know whether it is correct
It reads: OPISAFAGGOT

Doesn't look like there are any letters that can represent a space, so fuck you.

Isn't it very not infinite since our spacetime was born in the big bang?

The plot of the centre would be a voverory hohotot bobutot nonotot yetot cocololdod, cocurorrory momilolkok sosucockok momy cocococcoc. You fofucockokinongog idodiotot. Tothohisos isos /soscoci/, nonotot dodamomnon /lolitot/. Kokysos. Dodanonkoksos.

>brainlets can't read this

If there was vacuum. Cold
A Star, it would be hot.
A planet, cold again.
Although. a Center in the universe would suggest that something would have to be at rest, or at least relative to everything else.
And since we know that everything is constantly moving according to newton's law only affected by the gravitational pull by other celestial bodies then a center would be almost down-right impossible to even exist.

the egg is visibly opened before he "cracks it open"

>>8879966
he cracks it open 10 days before to put the semen into the yolk

>>8879947
oh God not this again
>>>/x/

You're already 5 years into this. Don't be a retard. Get your degree, a job, then do programming on the side.

>>8879705
I don't think ill get a job though. its all dependant on oil and I think oil will be phased out in the next 15-20 years. I don't wanna be jobless at 40 years old.

I mean I've heard of applications outside of oil but its primarily based on oil. and currently its really rough out there, my friends who graduated in 4 years have told me so.

>>8879732
What about seismology, mining or geodetics?

It's not a contest, you're just taking some arbitrary stupid measure for success.

>>8878686
>most advanced
This implies that there's a goal to advance towards, that's a human construct. Nature only cares about your fitness in the local environment.

>aren't insects and bacteria more successful than humans?
Yes, and then bacteria are more successful again.

>Did "life" have it right at the start....
Oh I think I see what you're trying to say. But there is no direction to evolution, it's just something that happens. The ones that are more suited to the local environment become more successful.

>>8878686
checkmate atheist.
You see the truth is that humans were created by god and were given souls. Other living things were not.
That's just how things are.

>with no math?
it's not like math is required for this.

>>8878523
>"it acts like 1 but it isnt 1 bro"
You sound like a hippy high on pot. You can easily prove the convergence theorem, and it is evident that the formula you derive that's supposedly equal to the number that the infinite series approaches is really equal to the infinite series

>>8878523
>Consider 1
>Divide it by 3
1/3 = 0.333...
>Multiply by 3
1/3 = 0.333...
(×3) (×3)
1 = 0.999...
>Quod Erat Demonstrandum
>Checkmate desu

>>8878005
Fuck that really looks like ms paint.

is it possible to absorb 100% of light?

>>8878315
i'm not confident enough to say this is fully accurate, but i don't think that absorption and emission here is irrelevant. with that said, a perfect black body would be impossible because the radiation absorbed has to be emitted back at some point due to the exited state of the electron dropping down to a ground state. what i mean by this is that at some point, you are going to get all the electrons in their excited state, and then all they can do is just reflect further energy via emission. the way these objects work is that they have a large surface area and aren't smooth, so there are more electrons that can make contact with light. i may be wrong on that though so please no bully.

Teleportation has been scientifically recorded in a controlled environment. Why does '5.2 Conclusion and Recommendations' say p-teleportation is unverified?

File: trump-skin-face-620x400.png (400KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 620x400px

>China.

See section 5, 5.1, 5.1.1 and 5.2 in the pdf. It's a 5 or 10 minute read