Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 487. page

>>2767225
It's boring.

And shit.

2/10

okay but I mean like why that's not feedback, that's a statement. ..

it's simple, good composition , but overall its a little boring, very cliche, not much else is going on.

>>2767324
haha i love the things that prompt people to come to 4chan /p/

>>2767324
ENHANCE

File: 1233546da22a.jpg (350KB, 852x1136px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 852x1136px

>>2767324
looks like E31 G3T or E31 FST or something

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:13 15:30:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	852
Image Height	1136

Not sure what your focus point was, the car?
Why did you pick the aperture setting you did?
The light just peaking out from the guy's face is annoying. You should have moved to the left so it was hidden behind his face. ISO is super high, so there's a lot of noise.

Compositionally, nothing is going on.

i see the light never noticed it and it is pissing me off. The focus point was suppose to be him looking over the cars. I am really not certain how to use the camera i have

>>2762483

>step 1: take pictures during the daytime or at least somewhere where there is actual light, so you don't have to use iso 6400

this photo is unforgivably bad. you need to do some actual research before coming here for critiques. Go read a book or watch some tutorial videos.

File: Screenshot_2016-02-09-00-38-41.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

Another example

>doesn't simply as the account owner what filters he/she used

>>2764201
>>2764202
>Dem thick thighs
>Dat slightly overspilling gut
>Dat navel piercing
>Dat thigh gap

Why isn't she mine brahs

>>2767040
How much are you paying him for his effort? What was his stated deadline?

>>2767047
I'm not paying for anything, but he got everyone excited and then disappeared, it sucks. i love the /p/ book, thats why i'm only here at the very end and beginning of every year (and that this board just sucks)

>>2767040
At least the voting guy laid out a timeline.

Just because you just figured this out doesn't mean it's not common knowledge.

>>2766592
This is fairly well known...

File: ffbfc5abb383d565bb1b4ec16137c18c.png (385KB, 399x399px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 399x399px

>>2766592

>he doesn't know what anamorphic cinematography is

Fucking saged.

File: image.jpg (315KB, 1789x1181px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1789x1181px

Shameful self bump, shot I took on my coolympus xa

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:26 18:38:41

File: img5.jpg (113KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4480
Image Height	2762
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:08 18:41:37
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

File: img3.jpg (75KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4821
Image Height	3117
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:08 18:51:13
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>2753530
Get yourself a tripod and be both

Alamby?

File: 2016-01-26_145234.jpg (95KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1200x800px

>>2753533
No I'm not a NEET.

50mm is only good for 35mm, you'll need an 80mm for medium format. stick with nikon or schneider lenses unless you're broke or can afford leica, even second hand lenses are great.

grain focusers are mostly useful if you're making large prints, for smaller (<8x10), focusing without one will still yield sharp enough prints. it's a very basic mechanism so no need to get an expensive model.

I'll post results / more advice later, cba'd atm.

>>2750724
I've looked at lots of different forums and a lot of people argue about whether an 80mm lens can cover 6x7, some people say a 90mm or 105. I'm going to be printing mostly 5x7, and maybe print 8x10 or 11x14 when I want something nice. The Fujinon 80mm EX, which is a 6 element, is going for like 80, while the el nikkor version is about 100. Haven't looked for longer lenses yet.

>>2750737
I used an El Nikkor 75mm with 6x7 negatives. It'll be fine.

>>2766974
photoshop and lightroom is only $10 a month

>>2766975
wow thats actually great, photoshop doesnt suck system requirements?

>>2766980
Some, but nothing dramatic. It will depend more on the size of the files you're editing, and how dramatic the edits are. If you have 40 layers with smart objects and Surface Blur, yeah, you'll kill it, but for some really low level exposure adjustment stuff, you'll be fine.

well not blowing the sky nuclear would be a good start

>>2766895
Its not my picture though. I'm just looking for general guidelines

File: EgWxIRf.gif (949KB, 150x200px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 150x200px

>>2766894
>>2766896

>If you can smell the street by looking at the photo, it’s a street photograph.- Bruce Gilden

What that means senpai, get fucken close to interesting subjects.
>Street stalls selling shit?
That's a picture.
>old Lady falling over?
That would also be a picture.
>Some dick head flopping it out to fap?
That is what some might say is fucked but still a picture.

File: IMG_0497.jpg (3MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3648px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Photos 1.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:04:18 17:09:48
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_0501.jpg (2MB, 5472x3072px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3072px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Photos 1.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:04:18 17:32:17
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3072
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 02.jpg (3MB, 5472x3072px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3072px

>>2766591
I really like this last one, anon. Foreground could be a little brighter though, imo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3072
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:11 17:01:32
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3072
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2755201

while scouting flickr i found some tight ass night photography in medium format. just search for 120 tungsten emulsions. iirc theres a guy called patrick joust or something like that, he had pretty neat night stuff.

>>2755211
probably unrelated, but isn't that the guy that shoots with a Yashica mat 124?

File: city_pict17a.jpg (53KB, 540x518px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 540x518px

Titarenko

Also pic was taken on the Indiana coastline behind a dead tree trunk.

You first

>>2765985

The only thing I know is that it is the worst type of Photography if you want to make money. There is a Canon explorer of light who works near me (Canon explorers of light are essentially sponsored and promoted by Canon)..

He works at a small lab developing other peoples photos because he makes less than minimum wage from his own photography.