Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 463. page

File: tamim-iqbal-world-t20-dharamsala-ireland.jpg (180KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 900x506px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1D X
Photographer	Matthew Lewis-IDI
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	5000
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	600.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3504
Image Height	2508
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: mashrafe-hits-six-world-t20-icc.jpg (132KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 900x506px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1D X
Photographer	Matthew Lewis-IDI
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	600.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2271
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: bangladesh-world-t20-dharamsala-ireland.jpg (388KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 900x506px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1D X
Photographer	Matthew Lewis-IDI
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	27.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	594
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2790573
Bumping, because I am planning on building a rig for video editing and am a noob. Doesn't necessarily have to be 4k, but how important is color accuracy in monitors for editing. As important as good monitors for audio mixing?(I come from an audio recording hobby).

>>2790573
Something with a wide gamut, and IPS (not TN)

Don't worry too much about it unless you're doing commercial printing. No matter how accurate your monitor is, and no matter how perfectly you get your colors and contrast, I'm going to look at it on my $200 acer monitor that's never been in the same room as calibration. Most of your viewers will not have calibration, and those who do, will have profiles that are very different from yours.

>>2790591
Agree, color accuracy doesn't mean much unless you print a lot. It's meaningless when everyone is viewing it on uncalibrated consumer TN panels, phone or tablet screens. Most displays will come pre-calibrated in some way, and I haven't had to touch the calibration since I got mine a year and a half ago. I also own a BenQ.

That said, once you get an IPS display with truer color accuracy, wider gamut and larger viewing angles you'll never want a typical TN display again.

File: Capture.png (442KB, 409x505px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 409x505px

example 2

>>2790455
orange saturation 100+
fucked up white balance

>digital trying to look like xpro slide film

looooooooooooooool

>>2790440
why no one makes 3 sensor cameras anymore?
forget foveon.
just put 3 fool frame sensor.

>>2790440
>if you never show it to anyone


perfectly fine. but wait, do you plan to film without the woman you're with knowing that you're filming? if that's the case, then even though the sex is consented and you're in your house, maybe the revenge porn laws (after the fappening) might come into play and make your footage illegal in the usa

In most sane countries the footage would not be permissible in court.

File: 1386603581515.jpg (70KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 500x700px

>>2790430
Cameras can't see trough walls. Do some exploded drawing.
>/p/ photography
>>>/ic/ is that way

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	500
Image Height	700
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:12:09 19:46:21
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	500
Image Height	700

Use a high F stop number Eg f18

>>2790251

Thanks.

>i want everything in focus
>but in this case, the label
>f/1.8

>>2790242
>Leica
>brand-related hype garbage?

Questions that answer themselves.

The M cameras make at least some sense but that piece of shit is absurdly expensive for no good reason.

>>2790185
Bump

>>2790162
Did you black out drunk on the side walk and now you're trying to remember what camera you had on you?

>>2790165
Why must their be a back story about this photo?

>>2790174
It's a shitty photo and we don't care what camera you took this on.

File: 62410002.jpg (1MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1545x1024px

>>2790094
gonna say sorry about the lack of quality, no flash and 200 film on hand made it hard to shoot. i know some of these shots are out of focus as well

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 5.57A.007 (150923)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

File: 62410007.jpg (1MB, 1024x1545px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x1545px

>>2790095

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 5.57A.007 (150923)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1545

File: 62410008.jpg (1MB, 1024x1545px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x1545px

>>2790097

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 5.57A.007 (150923)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1545

Also, I don't see it on the negatives, so either it's too small to see on them or it's a scanning issue.

Is that not just the bottom of the negative...? Just crop it off.

>>2790101

I don't think so because I can see a bit of the photo under it. I am cropping it, but I'm just curious about what caused it.

>>2789736
aperture is controlled through the body
only focus will be manual on the lens

>>2789737
This.
There's even a little locking switch to help you keep the lens set to f/22
This seems like something that could have been fixed by reading the manual. Or you could have at least posted it in the designated gear thread. Just a heads up for next time.

>>2789736
i hate when cameras / lenses do that

if you're shooting manual it's easier to just twist the aperture ring just as you would twist the focusing ring

fucking nikon

At this point you'll get the most from glidecam or anti-shake software.

>>2789709
What's the theme? I can't seem to figure one out looking though the other pictures

>>2789709
Black and white does not work for this image. It's way too busy, and the subjects are completely lost in a sea of busy competing tones. The pole and sky on the left are also really out of place.

>>2789709

Okay. But your photo sucks.

>>2789686
Film can lose some of it's features when stored incorrectly or after the expiration date. This is usually a loss of contrast or a change of color.
Just try it, getting a film developed isn't that expensive and the results could be interesting.

You have to find a place that does 126 film processing unless you are going to do it yourself.

>>2789740
also if it's faded etc you can always try and restore contrast and such in the scans with photoshop