Just finished reading Frankenstein. Thought it was alright. Any thoughts on the book?
It's alright.
>>8310575
Alright.
half-way decent
Hey guys, I need some help with my reading schedule.
I read 40 pages a day, as well as reading two issues of a comic a day (inb4) and watching two episodes of a television show a day.
I also watch three movies weekly.
While this worked for a couple weeks, I found myself unable to keep with it. How would you recommend finding the time to do all this?
I want to read a lot, but I definitely don't want to give up my other hobbies.
pic related: its me
>>8310327
Don't lock yourself into a schedule. If you want to watch a movie, watch it. If you want to read a book, read it. Just have fun with what you do, faggot, it shouldn't be a chore.
>>8310341
but i find if i dont lock myself into a schedule ill spend all day fucking around on 4chan
>>8310347
Just set aside an hour or two in a day where you force yourself to keep off 4chan and do something. I typically read 1-2 hours before I go to bed, and I can easily finish a book per week. Just relax, man.
What is truly your favorite book that's not a meme?
Basically if you say any book from this list or god forbid reddit's list your taste sucks and you have no individuality.
>>8310313
De Kapellekensbaan by Louis Paul Boon
>Belgian lit
It's certainly worth more than the Catcher in the friggin Rye.
>>8310313
That chart makes little sense for /lit/. I'm guessing that the sample size wasn't that large.
Does Calvin and Hobbes count?
Yes, yes, we all know Shakespeare's penchant for naming plays after minor characters, but did he ever write a play in which the main character was the reader himself? That's what David Foster Wallace achieved in his masterpiece Infinite Jest, my friend. Have you read it? I don't believe you have if you're still talking about Shakespeare. Of course you'll say, "But Wallace named his masterpiece AFTER a line from Hamlet! He's indebted to Shakespeare!" That's what it may seem like, but let's look closer. Infinite Jest is of course a novel, but it's also a parody of novels. By naming the novel Infinite Jest, he was mocking the novelistic convention of cribbing from Shakespeare for a fancy title. The Sound and the Fury. Brave New World. Pale Fire. Etc. Etc. Infinite Jest is simultaneously, therefore, the culmination of novel-writing, novel-writing brought to its conclusion, and also a parody of it and every genre except one: the posthumous novel. That Wallace achieved with The Pale King, which is of course a hilarious send-up of posthumously published work. No one's ever done that before, and most likely we won't see a writer attempt it again. As for Shakespeare, he was Wallace's plaything. In Infinite Jest he surpasses him in all things: intelligence, imagination, compassion, observation, wit, and so on. Of course, Wallace at five years old was enchanted with Shakespeare but outgrew him by age eight. It was at that age that he began to compose his own sonnets, lost today, but in the opinion of his parents (professors) and their co-academics they undoubtedly rivaled Shakespeare's and in a few instances he'd even surpassed the old bard. Of course, as we know from D.T. Max's biography (who will go down in history for being the first to write the Sorrowful Jester's life), Wallace at nine years destroyed all the poetry and prose he'd produced until that time in a temper tantrum that later on he admitted to be a parody of literary temper tantrums in which the writer destroys all his work. In this regard, the temper tantrum and its parodistic function is still being analyzed by scholars who are baffled by the complexity of its critique.
>>8310282
Pasta's a bit dry, chef
>>8310282
Nice bait OP
>>8310282
>citing a play to parody the novel
>argument by homology
Can anyone explain why this guy is put into the top tier echelon of fiction?
I absolutely love Kafka, but I seriously don't understand why he's put so high up there. If anything you would think his sense of humor would fly over the heads of intelligentsia and art critics. In fact you would think Kafka would go over the heads of most people. Does it have to do with the prose? I read the Neugroshnel translations but I understand any translation you are missing a lot of sly use of German wording and grammar.
On the other hand some people say Kafka is overrated, but I don't think that's the case either. I know the term "kafkaesque" makes me cringe like fuck, and I get the feeling his literature is heralded by normies who don't really understand Kafka's permavirgin status or his paranoid outlook on life. But I don't think automatically makes him overrated.
The situations he puts his characters in are incredible representations of human misery and ambivalence.
the reason there is such a word "Kafkaesque" is because he invented the protagonist at the center of a oppressive system that doesn't even try to explain its workings or reasonings. it's never been more relevant. like folks who don't appreciate Shakespeare because they don't realize he invented many of the tropes and even words in his plays, Kafka isn't overrated. he's an originator.
>>8310265
>>8310261
You are correct but that doesn't describe why people rate him up with Proust and Joyce.
Surely he's great for originality and bringing something new to the table but what of his actual form as an author? Does he truly belong in the top 3s of lists and such?
i wish i could go back to the good old days when e-books weren't as popular and trollface was still cool
Trollface days were pretty funny.
But then again, I was 14 back then, or something like that.
>>8310249
I wish I were aborted.
>>8310263
I thought spammers in Trade Chat on World of Warcraft was the peak of comedy when I was 14
>start reading 5 or more books at the same time
>finish none
how do i overcome this?
>>8310230
start with the...oh forget it.
Pretty good Gavin McInnes quote.
>>8310230
read one book at the time
I need recs on anti-roastwhore literature.
I've already read Schopenhauer's 'On Women' and it changed my whole worldview.
Looking for something like American Psycho or Marquis de Sade where women are treated as objects to be manipulated and exploited, i.e. as mere instruments to man's pleasure, as indistinguishable masturbatory props to man's immediate self-gratification, but without the liberal apologism.
Thanks
>>8310132
>I've already read Schopenhauer's 'On Women' and it changed my whole worldview.
>Looking for something like American Psycho
kek, hate to break it to you OP but you're a faggot. try andre gide's the immoralist.
>>8310143
Read the rest of the sentence, feminist cuck
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.
Just finished this masterpiece. Easily enters my top five fiction novels. The intermingling of historical events and commentary with the narrative was masterfully done.
I just read that there's a sequel, how does it compare? Is it worth reading?
Does Ken Follett have any other books worth mentioning?
>>8310115
back to /r9k/, pleb
>>8310138
What?
Aren't books discussed here?
I had this book in the 'to read' pile for over a year now. Can you sell me on reading it OP?
Recommendation on some horror books? I know i probably might be asking this on /x/, but i just want a scary long book to read.
bump plz
Lovecraft, Stephen King, Clive Baker are some common entry level horror books.
btw, Hellraiser is pretty damn good, though it is quite short (under 150 pages).
last stories and other stories by William t vollmann. it's 60p pages of 2spooky5u
I haven't read any books for a while since I got really busy with school and work.
Just picked up this bad boy a few months ago and it reignited my love for casual reading.
I still think about this fucking book everyday, it just feels so well thought out and engaging in ways I forgot possible.
The sequel was good but definitely not in the same tier, although the dialog with Ummon was fantastic.
I have since dived into a lot of other science fiction but few really hit the spot. I tried fantasy too but it's too speculative with all of the magic and shit.
Can someone recommend me some great awe-inspiring and exciting science fiction? Preferably not from the biggest and well known authors (Clark, Asimov, etc).
I'm thinking player of games or red rising.
>>8310023
try the general
>>8310035
Looks like it's part of a series. Is it okay to start with the general?
I thought the sequel was god tier, though obviously more "simplistic". I guess I'm just a sucker for those moments when all the mysteries are finally unveiled. And yeah Ummon was GOAT. I still remember reading that part with all my neurons fully focused on the text.
How are Simmons' other works by the way? He seems to have written a lot in different genres.
Can we all agree that Dracula is the worst gothic/fantasy/science fiction novel of the 1800s? The first third or so is good, but it goes completely downhill after that.
>>8309978
Why do you need others to validate your opinion?
>>8309978
It deserves merit for cementing the idea of the vampire in gothic and horror fiction. It does get really tedious by the end, and the journal format is gimmicky and infuriating.
>>8309978
its not even a third thats good. 50 pages are good, 300+ are not
What books deal with male sexual frustration and desire as a core theme; challenging these ideas and realities?
>>8309916
Read that /r9k/ loser who killed a bunch people
>>8309916
My diary
>>8309916
Whatever by Houellebecq, maybe?
Bukowski's Ham on Rye
Ishiguro's Remains of the Day is almost entirely about repressed desire, if you can tolerate the fact that most of the characters are posh and rich.
how can i force myself to start reading a book instead of shitposting?
>>8309909
It's useless because you are a dumb frogposter.
sell me your computer
>>8309909
Fuck off, frog idiot
I dont want to write some stupid stories, i want to write about my life and mind and thoughts, like a proust or miller, or many more, but i feel like special snowflake. Why should i think that anyone could be interested in my life?
Then write.
>>8309701
Nobody cares you fagtron.
>>8309701
You shouldn't