What are some good books on/about post-humanism?
>>9016052
i wouldn't know, because i cannot fathom not being human (and a crude guess would say that writers can't either)
>>9016055
shut up pleb
Post-humanism means after 'humanism', not 'humans' necessarily
>>9016052
>post-humanism
Does anyone else get annoyed by these new words that are absolutely meaningless?
I know this is difficult, but is it doable? I've heard people say you can only understand it with a college course. Is this true?
For the moral consciousness itself, however, its moral attitude does not mean that consciousness therein develops its own proper notion and makes this its object. It has no consciousness of this opposition either as regards the form or the content thereof; the elements composing this opposition it does not relate and compare with one another, but goes forward on its own course of development, without being the connecting principle of those moments. For it is only aware of the essence pure and simple, i.e. the object so far as this is duty, so far as this is an abstract object of its pure consciousness — in other words, it is only aware of this object as pure knowledge or as itself. Its procedure is thus merely that of thinking, not conceiving, is by way of thoughts not notions. Consequently it does not yet find the object of its actual consciousness transparently clear to itself; it is not the absolute notion, which alone grasps otherness as such, its absolute opposite, as its very self. Its own reality, as well as all objective reality, no doubt is held to be something unessential; but its freedom is that of pure thought, in opposition to which, therefore, nature has likewise arisen as something equally free. Because both are found in like manner within it-both the freedom which belongs to [external] being and the inclusion of this existence within consciousness — its object comes to be an existing object, which is at the same time merely a thought-product. In the last phase of its attitude or point of view, the content is essentially so affirmed that its being has the character of something presented, and this union of being and thinking is expressed as what in fact it is, viz.-Imagining (Vorstellen).
I unironically find Plato more difficult and opaque.
If you don't know the german langauge in and out, don't even bother
Was it Henry Miller or Charles Bukowski (pic related) or Celine who said something like this?
"A woman will tell you her madness in the first ten minutes of talking to her for the first time, but you won't listen because you are just trying to get laid"
Or something like:
"A woman will tell you all you need to know about her neurosis, she will tell you all the warning signs, the first time you meet her but you wont take any notice because you just want to fuck her"
I've been trying to find the book it came out of for years. Please help!!
bump?
>>9016000
Einstein
>>9016000
Sounds like Miller to me
Is there perhaps a reason you haven't read the greatest philosophical work ever written?
>>9015977
couldn't be sure it was my hand holding the book
That's not Aristotle's Metaphysics.
>>9015977
i don't need other people to tell me how to think and live my life
When Shakespeare invented all those words, how did people know what they meant?
They didn't, they just laughed because it rhymed
By sucking on his penis
Apparently, a lot of those were slang words used by women at the time.
What is the best (or least bad) translation of The Kalevala?
>asking a literature-related question on /lit/ in 2017
>tfw finn
Finnish is the root language of all languages
>>9015790
I've heard that the Oxford edition is at least respectable.
But, to get the most out of it, read it in finnish. Doesn't even matter if you don't understand a word, just listen to how it sounds to the kalevala tune.
Just got this, what am I in for?
How good of a read is this?
Literally just be yourself: the book
In all seriousness it's pretty good, if not pretty light, a beginner could pick it up and understand it clearly. Been meaning to reread it myself
>>9015691
I found it incoherent and repetitive. Like listening to a rambling old man who keeps forgetting what he's said.
>>9015744
Isn't that most philosophy books in a nutshell? I mean, if you're expecting some sort of coherent progression then go read some fiction.
Is there still a point to reading Kant if I want to eventually make some contributions to philosophy other than sharpening critical thinking and reading comprehension skills? I can't think of a reason as to why heavily studying him would be beneficial when he was ultimately wrong about most things. Of course, it's necessary to have a basic understanding of his ideas so that we can understand what the more modern philosophers are reacting against... but do I need to read and study the entire Critique or do anything like that? Can I just skip to the more relevant philosophers like the analytics?
Do whatever the fuck you want, you little idiot. I don't give a shit.
>>9015566
Man up and just read Kant already fuckboi.
template
ITT: Works that should be required reading for the human race
https://www.stephencovey.com/about/readinglist.php
>>9015506
>>9016145
>https://www.stephencovey.com/about/readinglist.php
The Book of Mormon? Seriously?
Welcome to the Short Story Reading Group! All are invited to join in at any time, or to come and go as you please. Thank you all for participating.
>The Lottery in Babylon by Jorge Luis Borges
>2,319 words
>Reading time: 12 minutes
>Poll
http://www.strawpoll.me/12185118
Discussion starts in this thread and will finish on Wednesday. The next reading is The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allan Poe (7,204 words). Discussion for it will run Thursday through Saturday.
>ebook
http://web.itu.edu.tr/~inceogl4/modernism/lotteryofbabylon.pdf
>ebook for next reading
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Tales_(Poe)/The_Fall_of_the_House_of_Usher
>Old threads
https://warosu.org/lit/?task=search2&search_subject=%2Fssrg%2F&search_op=op
Is anything going to top Bartleby or is it the most godlike short story of all time?
>>9015496
There are many great short stories out there. You'll have to read more to discover others you like!
Will read. Bump
Please help!
I need a minimalist word processor like Typed (pic related).
http://www.businessinsider.com/best-minimalist-writing-software-typed-2014-12
Are there any freeware alternatives?
Any settings on other software I need to look at?
Or what do you recommend.
A typewriter is fun and all, but it takes a god awful time rewriting and editing my texts. I need to speed things up for publishing. If I am to use a computer I don't wish do be disturbed by distractions. The screen is bad enough as it is.
If needs be I will purchase the software. But as a poor and frugal South African I need to make sure that I am not perhaps missing an alternative solution.
Sincere Regards
Anon
>>9015473
I use editor and wordpad
FocusWriter. Unfortunately its not a markdown editor, so if that's a deal breaker you'll need to look elsewhere.
>>9015473
Focus writer is fa good free software version of this pictured thing you have
The Bhagavad Gita
The Bible: Authorized King James Version
The Confessions
Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam
The Qur'an
What am I missing?
>>9015444
a fedora
>>9015445
l'epic of l'gilgamesh
Hello /lit/.
I've been watching a few videos on how comedians structure jokes, etc, and that reignited a desire to actually study about humour. I felt like this was the place to ask (I don't really come here), so, what would be some good books to get into some comedy discussions? The structure of a joke, discussions over morality and comedy, historical changes in what is considered humorous; anything goes, I guess.
>>9015242
Look for our nearest comedy class
>>9015242
aristophanes and plautus are my favorite ancient comedians.
the former includes much more base humor while the latter develops roman archetypes which function similarly to sitcoms. its fun to imagine the staging of the plays too.
Where the actual fuck do I even start with this guy?
What is the recommended and companion reading for him?
in order of relevance id say:
(1) summa contra gentiles: https://mega.nz/#F!6sgETKCa!vGFF5iTfCR6lH3ZLXaQorQ
(2) de magistro (on teaching): http://hosted.desales.edu/w4/philtheo/loughlin/ATP/De_Magistro/De_Magistro_11_1.html
(3) summa theologiae (main catholic tenets/virtues): http://www.newadvent.org/summa/
(4) de rationibus fidei (short defense against islamic objections): http://www.stfrancismagazine.info/ja/images/stories/7_SFM%20August%202010.pdf
actually desu if youre not too into the whole expounding on catholic virtues thing (summa theologiae which is kind of long and drags a bit), esse et essentia is good replacement/primer on the important metaphysics: http://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/aquinas-esse.asp
Give Aquinas by Feser and History of Philosophy by Fredrick Copleston a go.