How will reading Stirner change my outlook on life?
>>9095840
take the redpill instead, fucking retard
>>9095840
Your meme game will be unbeatable
Do it, faggot
Anyone else find shitposting about books you've never read incredibly funny?
I can imagine being observed by doctors and them wondering to themselves why I would invest so much time and energy in telling people their favourite books are terrible purely because I can.
I just love the futility of it.
>>9095439
Youru Eviruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
I got an A in a philosophy elective without reading any of the set texts desu
Really made me admire non STEM graduates (not haha)
>>9095439
It's so easy to do it too, for some books. Take for instance Blood Meridian, Catcher in the Rye, anything Hemingway, anything Vonnegut, the Bible. I'm starting to do it with increasing success with the ol' Pynchmeister too.
Recommend me some gardening books.
RHS Encyclopedia of Gardening
>>9095383
John Green must know something about Gardening after all his name is green . . .
>>9095480
His name looks black to me.
is suicide the logical conclusion of nihilism?
>>9095357
who cares? nothing matters anyways
Not really, since suicide is ultimately as pointless as living.
>>9095357
No, Communism is the logical conclusion of nihilism.
Anyone else feels like a piece of shit after a long reading session? I enjoy my time yet can't help but feel my life wilting away as I spend the entire weekend starting at words on paper. There has to be more to life.
>>9095188
>life wilting away
>has to be more to life
Recognize your spooks, my property.
>>9095188
I had something similar happen to me a couple of years ago, in university. But it wasn't me, it was this girl I knew because we were both studying Latin American literature. She said something to the effect of, "do you ever feel like the only reason you read is because you were known as 'the bookish kid' and you kinda just embraced it?" I didn't say anything autistic or insulting them because I didn't want to ruin the date, but I'll say it now: this is what I love, this is my passion. I could choose to do anything else, be anyone else, have a "hobby" to pass the time and a "career" that would fund my itinerant and unstable life, but I choose to read because it is the only thing that really matters to me. You can believe anything you want, that you're really artistic, creative, intellectual, and that you show that by reading or being erudite, I don't care. I know what i want, I know what my passion is.
>>9095188
Sometimes. I personally read to gain new perspectives and keep my mind open, but if I spend too much time in a day reading then I feel a little disconnected from reality, but if I stop reading completely then I start to become narrow-minded and confused. There's gotta be a balance between reading alone and interacting with actual humans, whether it be in person or online. Taking breaks and exercising a little bit helps. Also don't read shit just because someone told you to; you should read because you're simply interested in the subject.
>reading a book
>it doesn't contain anything about taxes and shit
>mfw throwing it into the trash
>>9095166
>reading LOTR for the first time
>no diarrhea scenes despite the fact they're all probably drinking tainted water
>none of the Orcs have asthma despite the fact they grew up in an industrial shithole with pollution everywhere
>no Aragorn Orc genocide sequence where he puts all of the Orcs in concentration camps after the war
wtf tolkein, fucking hack
>>9095250
Fuck this would be the best LOTR. I won't tell you to write it because I am stealing your idea, murdering all tolkiens heirs and writing it.
>character eats a meal
>no page long description of the food
into the trash it goes
Why do people like Leo Strauss try to appeal to old books in order to justify their super secret evil schemes? The axioms are just as arbitrary whether Plato said it or whether it was spelt in your corn flakes. Is this just a marketing move?
What evil scheme?
>>9095331
Perpetual war to keep the dumb masses morally upright and the smart should rule, or something like that.
It doesn't matter what the scheme is. I'm asking why people try to use the Greeks to justify it rather than "Because that's what I want". Is it purely marketing? I think so
I dunno, I just started his book on natural law. I believe he studies thinkers of natural law, greeks being the first and mandatory reading on the subject
What's so bad about self-improvement as a motto? Is it bad because it's cliche, too popular, hollowed out and reduced to vanity? But "real" self-improvement still exists, right? What are the moral implications of using the same label for what can be both a vain and humble life philosophy? Would it be moral for the "real" self-improvement people to start using a different label?
What's the deal with cliches in general? They aren't in themselves intellectually toxic, it just seems like our minds, even or especially those of highly intelligent folks, mostly care about novelty instead of wisdom and living a moral life. I see it all the time on here, highly abstract ethical discussions rather than say how to achieve serenity or not worshipping mammon/pornography or seeking cheap thrills/glory or fighting Internet addiction or how to not care about other's uneducated opinion. Tell me /lit/ isn't this the poison making us suffer, diminishing our self-esteem, robbing us of time etc.? Shouldn't these get the most attention?
But it seems only the former is discussed by /lit/ whereas the latter is discussed by /adv/ and /pol/ and /fit/ etc. Why is it that well-read people abstain from the latter? Is it that they don't care or that they don't want to care? It seems to me like it's exactly the well-read people who have the most trouble with mastering themselves and fixing their lives and whatnot.
Just imagine if it were these moral illnesses which are discussed on lit and what could be achieved in just a short period of time. Instead we just get the next iteration of free will x determinism and shitty political theory. Don't get me wrong, I understand the format, but you can't deny that there is serious discussion going on here as well and that it's being squandered. S q u a n d e r e d.
Can you explain to me why things are the way they are? I'm a dummy.
PS non anglo so sorry about m'prose.
>>9095092
>imagine if it were these moral illnesses which are discussed on lit
A lot of literature deals with these things and a lot of it is discussed. The board is just shit up, so you have to go looking for it. I'm not sure what exactly is your dilemma.
>>9095092
https://markmanson.net/disease-of-more
Anything I need to know before reading this? I've heard it's a difficult read.
reading
read Absalom, Absalom! first
Read the wikipedia page then the book. You can make sense of the story yourself, but there's honestly not a point to it.
Reminder that threads for political discussion, right or left leaning, are off topic and have no place in /lit/ and belong in >>>/pol/. This goes for thinly veiled political threads as well. Remember to ignore, report, and hide these threads. Thanks.
>>9095025
>not realizing the only reason I'm here is to use any thread that is vaguely political to spread right-wing redpills
This isn't your safespace, honey. We won the election. Enjoy the next 8 years
>>9095047
I'm a republican and I voted for Trump. That doesn't mean I want to hear about him or the same "tell me about Evola" thread 4 times a day. Keep it on /pol/.
>>9095055
wow you must be a numale cuck.
Trump belongs everywhere, he's fucking based. The right is rising, deal with it. No more cuck-tier french continental philosophy, psychoanalysis, and marxism threads. This place is now for Trump, Milo, PIeterson, and Hitler
Ey /lit/ recommend me a good study bible which I can pirate with ease.
>Stealing a book that literally tells you to not steal.
Do you not see the irony in this?
>>9094966
>Give unto the poor
>Dudes wanting 200 dollar for study bibles
Do YOU see the irony?
>>9094960
Simple: the Oxford Annotated Bible which uses the NRSV translation. I have it as a pdf.
What does /lit/ think of the Dialogue of Pessimism?
http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/myths/texts/classic/dialoguepessimism.htm
>>9094825
Please don't post that picture ever again.
>>9095059
She was a qt. That's why it was sad.
Is this the girl who got tortured and killed by those high-school kids?
any non religious books to help me have more discipline?
i'm straight edge on my way of quitting masturbation but i want to go further, i want to quit internet (leaving only sites that help my productivity) and vidya too, i also want to start exercising.
>productivity
you should despook yourself first
>>9094786
producing and creating satisfies me more than meaningless self indulgence.
>>9094757
>i also want to start exercising
Whats stopping you? No book will stop you from being a weak willed faggot.
The closest things I can think o are Deep Work and The War Of Art, which both suck
http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism03.shtml
How accurate is Varg's analysis?
>>9094671
can't be bothered to read anything by that nazi LARPer, but Tolkien was a hardcore christian, so Christian Vikernes is probably wrong, he's also incabable of coherent thought anyway and can fuck off twiceJesus' Tod is still the greatest black metal song everexcept maybe Transsilvanian Hunger
>>9094697
>not Kathaarian Life Code
Trans is great, but KLC is the definitive Darkthrone song. I dislike Varg, too, since I find he's views quite laughable and equal to black "dindu's", but I've read through it all and actually find it somewhat interesting. The problem is I lack knowledge of norse mythology and what not, so I'm looking for other, more informative, opinions on the matter at hand.
>>9094701
his*
>tfw you accidentally started with the romans
I'm gonna be a pseud forever aren't I?
it gets worse bro. if you read the latin romans instead of the greek romans, you're officially pleb
What did the romans even contribute outside of Greek rehashing
>>9094724
sex poems and shitposting 101