Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4336. page

>>29462624
>5'1" 120 lbs
wow shes fat aint she
im 5'7" and 109lbs and I carried a p250 for a while

>>29462763
>skeletor

>>29462624
Just get her a holster, if she likes tight clothes then in her purse, if she doesn't carry a purse then the bra option is not 'that' bad of an option.

Piss in them and let it ferment.

>>29462603
wasps. lots of angry wasps

File: Lex.jpg (77KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1000x500px

>>29462603
Fill it with piss

Just shoot left d'oh. There may be instances that they don't give a LMG or marksman rifle to you because that's reserved for people with right ergos.

>>29462501
Literally doesn't matter for anything except rocket launchers.

>>29462516
>>29462527
What about the shells leaving the weapon ?

1st for the Air Force.

2nd for the mighty cavalry

>>29458104

You will not get sent to language school as a new officer, that route is only for enlisted. Very, very few officers go to language school.

Be aware that Army OCS is competitive to get in and to actually graduate. If you fail OCS you will remain enlisted in an MOS of the Army's choosing for the remainder of your contract.

>>29462218
some guy had shit to carry so he put it in a satchel

faggot op

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

>>29462218
God damnit.

that's what you get for shopping at ass pro and not based dicks instead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVXz3XOpbyc

File: 49b43029-9301-4747-819c-e1bca4653d4b.jpg (35KB, 700x514px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 700x514px

>>29462017
I bet she has a real sandy vagina...

File: 1459373755028.gif (4MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 320x240px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOINSUWOqyo

>nogunz that will never become hasgunz
they're called europeans

>>29461986
cuz they fgts

>>29461986
>/k/, firearm owners

>>29461926
practice

>>29461926
This isn't real marksmanship.

>>29461926

Now i'm no expert but those feet are too far apart. Not very attractive gal either. I think biathlon is a better test because you have to shoot quickly while exhausted.

>>29461913
You shouldn't trust any publically listed depth capabilities for any active class of sub. Test and absolute depth capabilities are highly guarded secrets.

>>29462082
sure they are. but what are the intentions of the estimated depth?

as seen in the picture for example the diesel powered very cheap subs are not going to dive very long and very deep. i kind of understand that those are designed for this usual depth then.

but whats about the different depths of the nuclear powered subs?
why do they differ? why is sub A designed to operate in a depth of 400m, while sub B is designed to operate in a depth of 600m ?

File: 1457736224426.jpg (322KB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1500x996px

>>29461913
>What are the reasons/parameters, for the Navies around the world to define the operating depth of their submarines?

Physics - Every submarine (as in each specific submarine not class) will have a different operating maximum and theoretical maximum.

This is dependant on the welds and history of that specific sub. A first in class sub for the US and UK will always have a hamstrung operating and not to exceed depth. this is because the first in class goes through more vigirous sea trials. Much like aircraft, subs will fatigue over time, exposing them to high pressure will weaken the hull.

You probably wont find any Subs operating deeper than 100m for prolonged periods. NATO subs will have an operational limit of around 600. And all modern subs will have a crush depth in the region of 1000m.

>Why are there submarines that only dive to about 200 meters like in WW2 and others that go much deeper like 600 or even more meters?

Quality of construction / materials.


>but whats about the different depths of the nuclear powered subs?
>why do they differ? why is sub A designed to operate in a depth of 400m, while sub B is designed to operate in a depth of 600m ?

Depth is a secondary consideration and tends to be a consequence of the rest of the design - like agility for a bomber.

Depth wont hide you, its more important to make your submarine quiet and fast.

>>29461564
Because for a while they were dirt cheap, and decently accurate for the price. Plus, it's a neat gun if you like history. Mine's stamped as Tula from 1942. That plant got evacuated in 1941 during operation Barbarosa and the machines moved to a secondary site further east near the ivastek plant. There's a high likelyhood my rifle saw action on the eastern front and I can still fire it today.

>>29461751
1937 Tula here. Both the stock and receiver are covered in proof marks. Is there any way to tell where they're from or what they mean?

>>29461564
Was cheap, fires one hell of a round, there were millions made.

Reply requesting evidence and referring to OP as a bundle of twigs.

Obligatory claim to referring to an obvious reply before it is posted by another user.

>>29461399
Angry reply that is barely readable, with the only words salvageable saying that 45 caliber handguns are better than 9x19 caliber handguns.

>>29461324
Thanks, fuck knuckle.

>>29461324
Bang! You should have cleared me first asshole

>>29461324
A-AAAnhh~! M-Masuta~~~////

CZ75B looks like ass.

>>29461122
Because CZ is too fucking retarded to make enough of them. Seriously, nobody has them. I'm not paying full price for somebody else's used pistol because the retards can't import enough to meet demand

>owning firearms ever
How obnoxious, dangerous, and irresponsible

>>29461054

Rubbing Crisco on Bible passages will get you nowhere, I'm afraid

>>29461054
Highly unlikely.

/kommandos, what goes in all fields?

>>29461041
>gook made construction-grade helmet

>>29461077
I kinda like the way they look

>>29461041
>How do you think Iraq could have eight the first Gulf War