Hey /k/, so the front sight on my newest Type 56 is bent slightly, any recommendations on fixing it? Also general SKS thread
Have you tried hitting it with a hammer?
Either bend it or replace it for maybe a dollar
Are you this broken of a person that you needed help figuring this out
I'm thinking about getting one. Do you have to take the bayonet off to go to the range?
>2016
>Still using expensive, over-engineered aircraft
>Not just buying Saab Gripen instead
>>29447536
>Euroshit
How about no.
>>29447568
>Spend 24 years developing ultra secret high tech jet fighter
>Only buy like 10
>Never use them for anything because they're too expensive to risk breaking
>>29447589
>Literally 187 in use
Well memed friendo :^)
Oh also almost forgot about the most advanced fighter jet in the world, American of course. Enjoy your shitty poorfag planes as your militaries try and fail to get the F 35.
New gun owner here. I want to protect my guns, but I figure it's really not that hard to break into a gun safe, especially one that's reasonably priced. Am I wrong, and if not, how do I protect my guns?
>>29447391
Just make sure you get one with bars that extend into both sides when it's locked and you're set. Also a fire rating depending on how far your nearest firehouse is.
>>29447391
>it's really not that hard to break into a gun safe
Good one. Do yourself a favor and buy a real safe instead of a sheetmetal fireproof box.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mesa-Safe-Large-15-3-interior-cubic-feet-like-new-/262361495741?hash=item3d15f6b8bd:g:6LYAAOSwu1VW6eGe
>>29447391
Some countries REQUIRE you to store your guns in a certified safe at all times, and rightfully so; you don't want dindus to just waltz off with your collection while you're not watching.
The minimum requirements where I live are for storing more than 4 weapons is:
-the walls of the safe need to be 4mm thick steel, minimum.
-needs to be bolted to the ground / wall.
You want to have a safe with two locks.
>ctrl-f pimp
>no pimp my gun bread
Also >tfw save jpg doesn't work
>>29447352
>tfw screenshot doesn't work
>>29447453
Another boring AR
http://gawker.com/guns-wont-protect-you-old-people-youre-too-old-and-we-1767744515
So glad this piece of shit website is going to go bankrupt. The comments are cancer.
>>29446947
Why hasnt based Hulkster shut them down yet?
>>29446947
>linking Gawker
archive that shit
>>29446953
He basically did. Gawker wants to appeal but they need to pay 1/3 of the 150 dollar settlement first. Iirc, gawker made like 40 million last year. They're bones.
The electrical outlet closest to you just fired a single 12 gauge of 00 buck in the direction it was pointing.
How fucked are you, /k/?
>>29446675
favorite green hoodie is grazed
I'm good
It just shot my frigeirator
>>29446675
It shot through the backside of my couch. So I'm good but OP owes me a couch.
Recent aquistions thread?
Just got a sporterized mas-36. Anyone know where to get the front end stock for not balls expensive?
Liberty Tree Collectors has then for about $50 bucks.
https://www.libertytreecollectors.com/productcart/pc/viewcategories.asp?idCategory=66
>>29446868
Thanks!
>>29446628
Got a Ruby revolver purely because I started collecting Ruby semi autos and figured for $200 I might as well get my first revolver
Holy shit this thing feels amazing, I mean I've shot my dad's Colt Metropolitan and a little snubby revolver he has, but goddamn this this just feels perfect to hold
I'm already considering getting it professionally reblued because I can see myself liking this gun a lot
Could blowguns be used as an effective guerrilla weapon to obtain the weapons of enemy soldiers?
If so how can I make a guerrilla blowgun + darts?
>>29446490
I used to make them as a kid, 25mm PVC conduit pipe, a long thin nail and a cone made of paper + sticky tape.
They're hard to use, pretty fucking useless past about 10m and would need a poison to do someone serious damage
>>29446490
Only if you have really awesome poison.
Other than that something similar was used in that one assassination attempt with an air powered pellet gun hidden in an umbrella. Only really efficient in closer ranges.
>>29446490
They are useless unless you have good poison.
They are really only good as a novelty to blow darts into a dart board.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/world/asia/south-china-sea-us-navy.html
>Suddenly, the radio crackled again as the frigate responded in Chinese: “U.S. Warship 62, this is Chinese Warship 575. Today’s weather is great. It is a pleasure to meet you at sea.”
>Ensign Li responded, also in Chinese: “This is U.S. Warship 62. The weather is indeed great. It is a pleasure to meet you, too, over.”
>And on it went as the two warships, each loaded with missiles, torpedoes and heavy artillery, confronted each other with an exchange of weather pleasantries at sea. Testing whether the Chinese were openly following, the Chancellorsville made a turn, and its officers stood back and waited.
>A shout came from another one of Captain Renshaw’s junior officers: “He just turned, sir!” The Chancellorsville now had a tail. But for how long?
>Apparently the Chinese ship wanted an answer to that question as well.
>“U.S. Navy Warship 62, this is Chinese Navy Warship 575,” came a new message. “Do you continue to have long-term voyage at sea? Over.”
>Another no-no. Telling the Chinese the intended duration of the trip could be an inherent acknowledgment that they had the right to know, Captain Renshaw said. And that is not considered freedom of navigation.
>“This is U.S. Navy Warship 62,” Captain Renshaw responded. “Roger, all of our voyages are short because we enjoy our time at sea no matter how long we are away from home. Over.”
>As it happened, the Chinese ship had a ready answer for that.
>“U.S. Navy Warship 62, this is Chinese Navy Warship 575,” came the reply. “Copy that I will be staying along with you for the following days. Over.”
>That was Tuesday. On Wednesday, the Chinese frigate was replaced by a destroyer, which followed the Navy warship until midnight Thursday, when the American vessel exited the South China Sea.
The PLAN sound like pretty cool and bro guys 2bh pham.
>>29446482
Well their commanders understand they neither need nor want to challenge the Americans too much to take strategic control of the SCS.
America is doing very little to challenge China and so the Chinese respond the same way.
Plus the little guys never want to start WW3.
>>29446482
Reminds me of stories from the Cold War when we'd do something similar stuff with their bombers and our interceptors. The Soviets started putting commissars on the planes, so they'd simulate turbulence to make him go to the back of the plane so they could carry on.
>>29446482
>The PLAN sound like pretty cool and bro guys 2bh pham.
what is "diplomatic aesthetics"
New Rhodesia when?
never.
>XDDDDD LE RACIST BIGOTED WHITE RULED COUNTRY /POL/ TOLD ME ABOUT
>>>/pol/
>>29446123
They were fighting communism right along side blacks, you ill educated moron.
So I'm kind of confused when people say that the era of true warfare has ended, aka the 'infantry has become obsolete' meme..
But what about the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan, and the countless skirmishes around the globe? How is all that not true warfare?
Nukes didn't prevent the invasion of Iraq, so I'm not sure how anyone can claim that the modern infantry has become obsolete.
the era of true warfare has ended in 1914
>>29445828
it's the way the modern, advanced western nations do war, that has significantly changed. It's all about avoiding man-losses to the very end these days, by utilizing as much information gathering on the enemy in advance, messing up with the enemy's information and even media, and finally doing tons of pre-emptive indirect strikes on tactical spots.
Infantry's rolled in only when the scene's considered as safe as possible, only to "hold the fort" and to flush out the few remaining, holed in enemy troops. This is a farcry of the older days, when the main tactic was to roll in as much manpower to the scene as possible, duking it out with rifles and such. Up until ~80s, it was considered pretty common to suffer losses that count up to tens of thousands, but nowadays just a couple thousand fallen, in the period of a decade, is considered unacceptable.
With the advent of UAVs and such, we are literally approaching the time when the flesh and blood soldiers are starting to become "obsolete". Why spend thousands on a weak meatsack and worry about the emotional issues, when you can do the same from the safety of your bunker using robots?
>>29445828
Infantry has its uses where other things do not. Everything has a purpose.
Underrated hack or over rated genius
if you have other guns, its cool for a laugh. but i wouldn't trust my life with it
>>29445641
Despite being extremely ugly, I've heard they are pretty reliable. Also they were designed with the purpose of providing even the poor with the ability to defend themselves, which I would say is pretty respectable.
>>29446104
Why are they so ugly though.
Just curious as to people's fave shotguns. I like Saiga 12s personally
no one likes shotguns anymore? I also saw a tri barrel one I liked.
broken wrist but worth it
>>29446044
this is a semi common ersatz side arm in northern thailand (at least it's where I saw them)
they are produced locally or in philipines and are used by poorest police/game warden type armed personnal;
they mostly use flares, birdshot and lightened buckshot loads.
they don't share anythingwith a regular 1911 aside from the look.
The kind of guy who goes to the range in full gear.
other people
>>29443994
Also this.
>going to a range
Gear thread? Rate my belt m8s, would like to get a pistol mag pouch and eventually replace the AR mag holders with HSGI tacos.
What's in the right max pouch? Looks like not too much room for pistol mags on there.
>canteen in perfect position to rape lower spine if knocked to the ground
>not just getting a camelbak
>carrying a dump pouch when you only have three magazines
2/10
>>29443814
Dip. Would put a pistol pouch on the far left next to AR mags
>>29443871
I have a plate carrier with 4 more mags, a camelback pouch on the back, and an IFAK on it. Goal is to have the belt set up as a complimentary but separate entity. Would like to have 4 AR mags on the belt when done