I have a question I cannot sufficiently answer with google.
Is there electrical ignition of firearm rounds? What kind of systems are there, if yes? Do they work with normal munitions?
Thanks for any answers.
>>31499056
You want a gun with batteries and electrical contacts?
No.
>>31499056
>Is there electrical ignition of firearm rounds?
Yes
>What kind of systems are there, if yes?
Commercially? Remington EtronX, but it's dead
A bunch of military autocannons and stuff as well.
>Do they work with normal munitions?
No.
>>31499056
yes.
mostly things like autocannons 30mm 25mm etc.
i think a few companies tried civilian hunting rifles with electric ignition but they failed.
how the autocannon setup works i don't remember. hopefully someone has diagrams
Why do people wear this? all of the iraqistan vets i know say they find this extremely cringy
especially the bad translations
The same reason people put Browning or Glock stickers on their vehicles. They wish to strongly signal to other people that this is a core part of their identity.
>Why do people wear this?
to protest the islamification of their country and culture.
>>31499051
>to protest the islamification of their country and culture.
the only people i see wearing/buying this are americans
since when is america getting sandnigger'd?
Hello everyone on this fine board.
I currently live in Europe and have already taken all the steps necessary to be able to shoot and own (semi-auto) guns.
Here is my question:
What should I choose between
-CZ scorpion evo 3 (9mm) (1500 euros)
-Luvo LA-15, 10,5 inch (.223) (1200 euros)
-Colt AR-15 expanse 16 inch (.223) (1100 euros)
Are SBR's obsolete for home defense? Is .223 worth it knowing that the ammo is 3 times more expensive than 9 mm?
Thanks for your help.
Is this rifle solely for HD? Or fun and HD?
10.5 inch ar would be good for home defense. SBRs make great HD guns, the problem being you might lose it permanently if you actually kill someone with it.
If it's for fun then I would go with the evo personally but I like them. What other guns do you own?
>>31499005
Since the use of these weapons in my country is only recreational (strict rules about how and where to store them), it would also mainly be for fun.
I do not own any guns yet (it can take up to 4 month before my file gets processed). Next to a shoulder firing weapon, I was thinking about buying a CZ P07 since it's 200 euros cheaper than a Glock 19, and I prefer the trigger over the one in the Glock 19.
>>31498964
I would say 9mm over .223. Higher availability, cheaper, and smaller and cheaper mags and guns.
I have a bias towards CZ, mostly because they are europeans and have the best bang for the bucks.
There is also licensed copies of the MP5 for relatively cheap, and Kel-tec is making some pretty honorable stuff.
I'm assuming the range a civ like me is going to engage in Europe are street-to-street at most, and mostly room to room. For the country-side a scoped bolt-action would be best. So, I would say SMG, or even pistol over SBR.
Definitely SBR for a car gun though. AK/AR shorty, bullpup/foldable stock. You're in your car so in relative cover and you don't need to worry about magazine volume and weight.
could any armyfags tell me how realistic you find arma?
you're a fag
>>31498908
It's very realistic. The small unit tactics, mechanics of weapons and equipment, and scale are very similar to actual operations in the real world.
The lack of a suck mechanic in the game is unrealistic. Not drinking water and eating food in huge ass movements like that isn't accurate.
>>31498908
You want a realistic army man simulator? Try this. A good old game of Emu bob.
t.aussie army digger
Retarded less-lethal weapons thread?
Retarded "weapons" thread
The magnum opus of getting yourself killed
Rubber bullets.
>be SWAT
>bank robbery turned hostage situation
>MP5 fully loaded with 30 rounds of Trojan
>tear gas the bank
>run in spraying rubber bullets on full-giggle
>bdddddpt.gif
>get some turrist
>get some hostages
>spraying everywhere with reckless abandon
>everyone slumps over to the ground
>mag ran empty, slap in another 30 rounds of less-than-lethal rubbinators
>nonlethal so might as well doubletap and make sure the bad guys are knocked out and not just faking it
>walk around popping foreheads
>think I shot one of the hostages in each eye twice
>less than lethal alternative, everybody's gonna be fine when they wake up lol
>job well done, time to go get doughnuts
>20 minutes later EMTs put 2 robbers and 26 hostages all in body bags and haul em off to the coroner.
>I am the only survivor.
>>31498763
I fucking hate those ads
>Ooo look it's so powerful it's got smoke coming off of it
>So edgy look at how futuristic it is
>Literally just a rebranded ultrafire 878
>Some family/grandma is going to blow their money on this thinking it's going to do anything but catch fire and burn down their house
So i live in Australia and as you probably know butterfly knifes are illegal and i have had a trainer for about 3 years does anyone know how to obtain the real thing?
>>31498747
sharpen it
>>31498771
You cant they either have a weak blade or holes so it is again to weak
>>31498747
I've heard you can buy the "kit" to make it, disassembled parts
also i would try pawn shops and small shitty gas stations or something like that, maybe army stores, also the internet
also have someone in another country get one and mail it to you
also I would try to order the best one online to sharpen a blade into, one with a point and good metal
I'm worried about having to expand my current caliber footprint past my current 5.56/.223 + 9mm
Are the ballistics of a .223/5.56 bolt-gun good enough to justify buying one for precision use?
>Caliber Footprint
? If it's precision you won't be utilizing hoarded makes of 5.56.
>>31498565
*Masses
No. .223/5.56 are effective out to 400 yards. Sure, you can hit something at 500 yards, but you won't hit it with a lot of force.
If you're going to get a bolt gun, get a .30/06, or .308 if you want to trade cheaper ammo for a little less range
Hello /k/!
Which artillery is this?
Google reverse search doesn't give anything.
>>31498532
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV433_Abbot_SPG
>>31498532
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV433_Abbot_SPG
Thank you, I will now delete this thread!
Hello. Don't mind me. I'm gonna dump pics taken of my visit to the Submarine Museum in Melaka, Malaysia. This Museum houses an intact Agosta Class Submarine, an A-4 Skyhawk and F-5E Tiger II.
Visitors are allowed to enter the submarine. It looks big from the outside but I don't know how 51 people can live for months inside a space that is only slightly bigger than inside two long bus.
I had only a camera phone and I take autistic pics that might only interest fellow /k/ autists. There's about 50 pics so bear with me due to the post timer.
/k/'s opinion on Larry Vickers?
He's a fat guy who happens to do decent videos that desperately clings to his glory days
>>31498156
A tub of opinions and self-hype that used to be a soldier, who pines desperately for the days when everything didn't hurt and he could do more than 'stagger with intent' and people actually respected him.
>>31498156
'gang' - fuckin triggered.
he strikes me as an arrogant POS. The way he treats others around him makes me routinely wonder how they put up with his shit, but hey, he seems to know what he is doing. Also, i think he has a rather high chance of showing of kraut space magic some time soon. I'm waiting for that.
Where do you think China's nukes are pointed at? Like what percentage of them?
hopefully they're all aimed at you
>>31498003
probably pyongyang , washington, maybe some military targets near them. They don't have enough nukes to fight us, so they aren't going to risk a retaliation.
>>31498003
>3 nukes pointed at deep South Texas
There's nothing here. WHY?
What is nature's best weapon /k/?
blunt force?
bite?
claw?
sting?
etc?
>>31497957
Natural creature or just nature? I think nature in generals most dangerous weapon is indifference.
Penis
>>31497963
Natural creature
as in hunting or protection
Who wins? And why?
Keep in mind:
India has a no-first-use nuclear weapons policy.
Pakistan does not, and may use them if India launches a full scale invasion.
>>31497870
If no nukes fly:
India.
If nukes fly:
A very very angry India. (and the world, as a bunch of shit heads just died)
Who has the better air force?
>>31497893
Like don't see how Pakistan could kill the street pooper fast enough. India just needs to buy or manufacturer the cheapest nugget like salt weapon and just send waves till the sand niggers are dead.
Fat guys who carry. how do you carry? What do you carry? (besides shame)
Fat "people" shouldn't be allowed to own guns, because they're not human
>>31497839
if you are so fat that you have to wear tight clothes, you are bullet proof. No gun needed
>>31497839
How does it cycle?
This thread again?
It has a bolt handle but there's no space for it to go. it wouldn't be mechanically functional, but it's a video game, so no one cares.
>>31497838
Very carefully.
QUICK WHAT IS THE BEST ENDING AND WHY IS IT THE HOUSE ALWAYS WINS?