How would you deal with communist Kansans hopping over your border and burning your towns /k/?
>>32594411
>>32594411
did i miss some big news story or something?
>>32594411
With an honest rifle and the blessing of my lord and saviour, Jesus Christ.
A 5' 9" 235lb Autistic man charges /k/ from 22ft away, wielding dual pic related
>How does /k/ defend itself from the autism charge?
whip out my deagle and blast his ass
>>32594202
Since the 21 foot rule applies, I instantly know I won't have time to draw my Desert Eagle (carried condition fabric with a round in the chamber ready to rock n roll). Instinctively, I draw my Katana that I keep strapped to my naked body and concealed in the leg of my JNCO jeans. In a flash I slice off my aggressors arms and legs, and then watch as he writhes on the ground in agony, before I tell him "Konichiwa" (this means goodnight in Japanese, my signature language, the language of true warriors).
>>32594202
Are the HK smgs available to the public for semi auto use?
If so, are they all good, I'm tempted to have one. Maybe the mp5 in 9mm with a foregrip.
>>32593750
I've been wondering this. I've never seen one.
there is a company that makes an MP5 clone in semi, but i can't remember the name, and cannot speak to the quality.
>>32593750
H&K stopped civilian imports of mp5s years ago.
You'd need to find one used or buy a clone.
Is this superior to a sword in a 1v1? It's faster and can bend or break a sword. It's too thick for a sword to cut through.
Thoughts?
>>32593574
not sure.
>>32593574
I'd still shoot you.
>>32593574
>faster
no
Also you can't stab someone with it and the lack of crossguard means someone just has to run the sword down the length of the weapon and there goes your hands.
Terrible thread.
I know some of you guys are really great at stroking things, but please refrain from jerking off your rifle.
Thanks.
>>32593066
No. I must ensure that everyone else at the range is aware of the amount of dick I suck.
>>32593066
how does this grip not fuck your wrist to oblivion?
I thought we'd already gotten our laughs in regarding this shitty 2010 meme.
Why don't submarines have deck guns anymore??
>>32592901
Because missiles.
>>32592901
why don't guns shoot arrows
>>32592917
Why don't you shoot missiles then? ITS THE CURRENT YEAR
>>32592924
Explosive Rambo style arrows are acceptable.
>Los Angeles class submarine surfaces a mile offshore
>deck mounted ballista resigns fire down upon the enemy
What if the entire B-2 bomber fleet was sent back in time to Nazi Germany on September 1st 1939?
The B-2's are given an infinite supply of modern munitions and spare parts, but only for them to use, and no nukes. The Germans are fully trained in their use and maintenance and no time travel paradoxes are present either.
>>32592856
Why B2's?
B52 would fly higher and carry more
>>32592869
B-2's are sexier
>>32592869
The B-52 probably could carry more, but fly higher? It has almost double the wing loading of the B-2.
Man I am extremely poor from medical bills and I've wanted a nugget for like a year.
Could anyone donate a nugget to me?
>>32592791
How much do you make a month?
>>32592791
>donating a $200 rifle
Here's a stick that looks like a gun. Don't poke your eye out.
>>32592791
If you're so broke you don't have $250 the LAST thing you need to be buying is a gun
So I've been thinking about camo. I was thinking about how its all based on taking natural patterns of nature to disrupt your sillouette and all. We have all these green based camo's out there, yet if you look at animals in nature, most of them are of a brown or tan shade. Based on Darwin ism and survival of the fittest, it seems these colors were the most advantageous. Even in highly wooded areas, you see mostly born in mammals and other animals.
So wouldn't it being more advantageous for us humans to wear tan based camo in pretty much most types of terrain and not specifically justdesert based biome's? It seems we are so caught up in green based camo to match the vegitation, yet there are no green mammals and such that need to blend in to survive. Also, tan and yellow based colors reflect it surroundings so tan may look green in a wooded area. So wouldn't tan based camo make more sense even in heavily vegetated areas?
Thoughts?
>>32592730
I always liked the tan army men, sure they didn't get the same love as the greens but they were still cool
Though they were always the first to go on the 4th of july
Doesn't matter. During the day we can wear International Orange jump suits for all it matters, because no one is hiding during the day in a general issue uniform. The measure of an effective camouflage for military applications is not how it blends at close range, in the open, in good lighting, during the day, in the United States. The truest measure of a camouflage pattern for general issue is how well it aids the service member in not being identified at distance, at night, while they're utilizing good concealment and movement techniques.
>>32592781
There are much more uses for camouflage outside the miltary and operating. Quit thinking specifically the use for military. I'm talking about camouflage as a whole. The act of blending in to the environment. It seems tan would be more effective than green.
How would /k/ arm a humble yacht?
>>32592642
20mm Oerlikon on a forward mount.
>>32592642
>>32592649
What if it's a catamaran? Which bow?
What about the rear?
>>32592658
Modernized USS Constitution when?!
>those DU cannonballs
>composite chain shot to break the masts of Chinese carriers
>canister shot filled with DU flechettes for anti personnel use
>a drunk Irishman with a carronade for missile defense
The seas be ours
Are you /K/ommandos ready for Nationwide Concealed Carry Reciprocity?
https://www.thetrace.org/2017/01/new-bill-congress-states-concealed-constitutional-carry-reciprocity/amp/
Also, this bill allows for residents who can't get a concealed carry permit in there own cuck state (California, Maryland) to get a out of state Utah permit so they can carry everywhere.
>>32592495
nope, it's not gonna happen.
>>32592495
>can get a permit in a non cuck state
Please, I know it's a pipe dream but please.
Aren't there about four bills in congress with different wording but regardless it's Nationwide CC?
MиГ-25ПУ (MiG-25PU)
>>32592333
What about it?
>>32592333
Catches fire if you use 100% throttle.
Wasn't able to catch the SR71(it's main purpose).
Dosnt turn
It's shit teir
Nice trips
>>32596115
delet this
Assuming cost was no issue And all existing US army firearms equipment mags and production capability could be instantly covered from 5.56 to 5.45 should the Us army do it? It is a more modern cartridge, does it do thing 556 can't?
>>32592331
No.
/k/ redpill me on the .40. Is there any good reason for it to exist? Did we really need a halfway round between 9mm and .45? Those of you who carry it regularly, why?
>>32592282
It was a good middle ground round when it was created, but modern ammo has made the difference between 9/40 negligible. You have more recoil and less rounds. It's not inherently a bad round or a meme like on /k/, I just think it's going the way of the Jaegerbomb
Only people I know who use it are cops, people close to cops or the prison system and dumb fudds.
>>32592282
>redpill
Is this how homosexuals convey their status over the internet?
FBI use 10mm, women and smaller men can't handle it. .40 is born.
Why did the US develop a WW2 tank and call it an APC? but doesn't perform the role of APC aswell as a truck.
>>32591598
Because it's not any of those things. it's an infantry fighting vehicle. It's designed to deliver infantry to a battlespace while protecting them against artillery and bullets of heavier calibers but also being able to offer enhanced firepower to the dismounted infantry.
>>32591598
Also, why are you calling it a WW2 tank, it has a modern autocannon, an ATGM launcher and can mount advanced sensors including thermals and night vision.
>>32591635
He's probably about to go on some Pentagon Wars/Sparky meme tangent.