Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1774. page

>not getting the 6"
Use that shit 4" to KYS.

it sux a little hard for lefties
but if you don t use the thumb stud or the clip then you can pocket wave from either side

i had a 6 inch, smooth as fuck can be opened by pocket or just flick it open

really nice choice mate

>>33236929
boy its my first knife and I want something I can carry without being excessive.
>>33236930
alright sweet thats what I hoped for

You get a boot on the ass and a VA appointment two years later.

>>33236817
Yes but I was wondering if I keep some of the weapons they give me?

>>33236786
is this actual weaponized autism?
has science gone too far?

They have no reason to get better. People still buy their shit.

>is Remington ever going to get better?
Unlikely.
>should i go with a Winchester SXP?
No.
>what are some other pumps that you guys recommend?
You have the only contemporary pump that matters. Collect now. Trench gun, Ithaca, an old 870 police magnum, maybe a nickel 590, meme shit like the KSG or Six12.

>>33236656
>nickel 590
You mean 'marine coat"?
I'd kill to find one of the old nickel mossbergs.

what is it like being so retarded you cant even search a catalog?

Gay and not related to weapons. Fuck off.

>>33236583
The first patch I have seen on /k/ that I like and might wear.

>>33236357
an imageboard

An Archangel stock.

an hwatgaem

PPSH41

>>33236298

1864 Gatling

File: 17101191_234651726997468_731694993_o-733x420.jpg (56KB, 733x420px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 733x420px

>>33236169

>>33236173
Hey kids do you like Wind noise and rotor buzzing right on top of your fucking head?
Boy do i have the thing for you.

>>33236013
Yea, put ERA on your ERA

File: M1A2_spaced_armour[1].png (810KB, 1136x503px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 1136x503px

>>33236013
with tandem armor

>>33236462
to make this even more interesting, consider that in this image, the main portion of the insert, which would have gone between those standoffs is supposedly missing

An X95.

>inb4 its a 5 moa rifle

Its not. Its a 3 moa PDW. You planning on engaging targets past 200m with a PDW? K.

At least the platform has been around since the early 2000s and has been battle tested.

>>33236084
Is that chambered in 7.62 NATO?

>inb4 muh keltec
I'm pretty sure both these rifles in prototype outperform that weapon.

File: vvv 012.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Is the PPSH-41 to mainstream for you?! get yourself the new M49/57 from Zastava and be the special snowflake you are.

File: c328d444a698ed0892b63d80e81268e2.jpg (81KB, 564x752px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 564x752px

Bump.
Pic was inspiration for my 9mm SBR

Giving bonus points to anything that uses Uzi mags. I can modify them to work in the AR; I've got a bunch showing up later this week so I can perfect the cut.

>>33236056
Where do I find one of those? I see a few sold out parts kits but that is all.
I've also heard the PPSH is a pretty difficult build. Uzi will be quite easy, just a quick cut to the front trunnion and a weld to the repair section.

****guns* god damnit.

>>33235941
>>33235945

I read that as "placenta homicide" and threw up a little

File: mexmarine.jpg (160KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 960x540px

>>33235941
>exiting the front door when there are men in your yard with guns

stupid. work the funnel

File: 1486864228206.jpg (22KB, 465x416px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 465x416px

>>33235905
STOP SHILLING YOUTUBE FAGGOT

>>33235920
shilling? I hate this dumb faggot.

If I'm shilling it's so you guys spam his comment section, undermine his business and drive customers away so he hopefully drinks his miserable retarded self to death

>>33235950
You are giving this guy views. You are bumping other threads off the board. Listen, we have WAY TOO MANY ""hurr durr this guy on youtube sucks"" threads. YOU SUCK. Your thread is low quality, I don't even know who this guy is. You know that? please do the right thing and delete the thread

File: 1325488209445.jpg (345KB, 2129x1415px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 2129x1415px

OP here

The answer is yes.

File: 1420740815669.jpg (719KB, 1599x1064px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 1599x1064px

>>33235546

Probably. Anons can sit and argue about specs, and specific scenarios and the F-35, and make all kinds of comparisons, and all sorts of gay retarded shit, but on the simplest level of what makes a cool thing cool, yeah they're cool as fuck

Also a fun story

>be me, in 2001, not too long after 9/11, 8th grade, in a town near San Antonio TX
>Walking home from school because a friend figured out walking across town got us home 20 minutes faster than the bus, and the bus is for faggots
>Hear jets overhead which is odd for our small town
>look up to see 2 A-10s flying what I thought at the time was very low, at least low enough for me to easily identify them, having grown up idolizing the A-10 so it was instantly recognizable
>pretty sure that same day I achieved puberty, probably because of the patriotism boner
>BBBBRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTT

File: maxresdefault[2].jpg (163KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1600x900px

>>33235546
Out of the common aircraft in games set in modern settings, yes. But I think there are some shitty-ass WW2 prototypes that are damn interesting, like the XFY-1 Pogo and the Do-335. I personally like the EMB 314 Super Tucano, it's like a generic WW2 piston plane but with modern equipment and tech.

File: 1440526667665.png (18KB, 182x233px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 182x233px

>>33235522

>>33235522
Yes

Pros:
*It's incredibly cool

Cons:
*Not rated for +P
*9mm ones are expensive. 9mm ones that haven't been run into the ground are even more expensive
*Doesn't use magazines
*Few holster options, can't be concealed

You decide.

*only 250 rounds thru it

>>33235513
You were doing better when I thought it came with 250 rounds

$800 is a little steep

>>33235523
Now that I'm on the hook I can't really back out, but what would be a good price for future reference?