Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3759. page

>>969945
because /his/ is evolachan

File: 7641889_f260.jpg (21KB, 260x333px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 260x333px

what makes it shit

>>970040

Muh traditional morals
Muh monarchy

guys please help, I need you more than anything right now

>>969887
Sure you aren't plagiarizing?

Also:

Define capitalism
Define Peasant

>>969933
I'm using Paul Sweezy's definition of capitalism:
(1) ownership of the means of production by private capitalists; (2) separation of the total social capital into many competing or potentially competing units; and (3) production of the great bulk of commodities (both goods and services) by workers who, owning no means of production of their own, are obliged to sell their labor power to capitalists in order to acquire the means of subsistence.

and by peasant I mean anybody that works as a farmer under a manorial lord.

not plagiarism, but if you've read this somewhere before and know the source name that could help get me some ideas

>>969520

They're all English by descent because all of those monarchs are descended from Alfred.

/thread

>>969550
>English by descent
>this is what the English tell themselves

House of Lancaster was English. At least culturally and linguistically.

>Waist your entire treasury on retaking a war damanged Italy for 40 minutes
>Good

File: get at me.jpg (228KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 2448x3264px

>>969523
>Waist

Considering circumstances, best emperors were Theodore Laskaris and John Vatatzes.

The jews happened

>>969199
this meme again

>>969138

Nobody won, it was a stalemate because the farmers kept hiding in holes and USA had to keep killing them all with their seemingly infinite amount of resources.

>>968668
italian detected

like none at all. the average person is a pleb posting on /pol/ or /int/ getting basic facts about his own and his enemy's country wrong all the time without ever being corrected by someone who knows something.

>>968119

Well I mean did a Greek know that civilizations existed before them?

>>968136

Hesiod talked about how there were ages before the current age where men were more powerful and lived longer. They also would have known about Troy since the Odyssey was very popular.

File: image.jpg (88KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 400x600px

How would Christianity look different today if Peter claimed to be the Son of God rather than Jesus?

>>967949
It would [spoiler]rock.[/spoiler]

>>967901
>Ali as prophet
Ali was a weak ruler. Look how he handled Muawiyyah. He let him free, half of his follower left him in disgust.

How Muhammad handle a rival? Brand them as munafiqun, isolate them so they don't get any followers.

Now if Ali was the prophet, he would be killed by his rival just like had happened in his caliphate. Maybe we will see the shahaba & salaf like early christian with
>muh oppression

swords are bad ass nerd

sword music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ1WyBGG_Vw

>>966766
>Ignores the Romans

>>966766

Dueling, sporting, and self defense weapons are commonly more iconic than war weapons.

Ask a hundred people on the street to draw the first thing that they think of when they hear the word "gun", and I bet the overwhelming majority of them will draw handguns, not rifles.

They wouldn't care because they used slaves. The Romans had steam engines but it was never anything else but a curiosity.

>>966458
They'd probably have trouble applying them unless you bundled some knowledge of mechanics in there too

>>966458
they don't have everything else that was necessary to use steams engines. There is a large chance nothing happens and small chance everything changes if people with sufficient power can see its usefulness and build the infrastructure necessary

>>964902
Nice thread Mehmet.

>>964902
That is one of the things i admire about medieval muslims

>>964902
The Byzantines had done that before to besiege a Crusader castle, no?

File: pragmatiko-prosopo-tou-iisou-ntokimanter-700x360.jpg (68KB, 880x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 880x500px

Summary of scientific and historical evidence supporting the authenticity of the Shroud:
http://www.newgeology.us/Shroud.pdf

Shroud-like coloration of linen by nanosecond laser pulses in the vacuum ultraviolet (it explains that they replicated the shroud's qualities using laser pulsations, which so far is the only way anyone has been able the replicate the shroud's qualities):
http://www.sindone.info/DILAZZA3.pdf

Studies on the radiocarbon sample from the shroud of Turin:
http://www.shroud.it/ROGERS-3.pdf

Nuclear imaging:
http://shroud.com/pdfs/whanger.pdf
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/accett2.pdf

3D holographic information:
http://www.khouse.org/articles/2009/847/
http://www.ohioshroudconference.com/papers/p24.pdf

Raymond N. Rogers' observations and conclusions:
http://shroudnm.com/docs/2013-01-10-Yannick-Cl%C3%A9ment-Reflections-on-Ray-Rogers-Shroud-Work.pdf

Here's some secular peer-reviewed scientific journal articles on the Shroud of Turin:
http://shroud.typepad.com/topics/2005/10/secular_peerrev.html

Also, here is ancient evidence for Jesus from non-Christian sources:
http://storage.cloversites.com/fcfgroups/documents/Why%20We%20Believe%207.pdf

File: Stirner.png (8KB, 238x211px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 238x211px

>>969295

It's just a medieval man rapped in a shroud. Spook.

File: C14SampleLocation.jpg (68KB, 819x666px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 819x666px

>>969295
>b-but the 1988 tests dated it back to the 13th century!
The sample was cut from a corner of the Shroud which was part of a later repair, the dating contradicts other evidence, the sample may also have been contaminated by bacteria, smoke or reactive carbon and further evidence shows that the calculations were done incorrectly. You can verify all of my statements.

The three dating labs, according to a scientific protocol agreed upon in 1985, were supposed to cut several samples of the Shroud from different locations. Unfortunately, that is not what happened. Instead, the scientific adviser to the Arch Diocese of Turin, Luigi Gonnella, decided to violate the protocol and allowed only one sample to be cut from an outside corner where it had been handled hundreds of times over the centuries as it was held up for public viewing.

This flawed examination was actually discredited by Dr. Ray Rogers who published in the January, 2005 issue of Thermochimica Acta. Dr. Rogers stated, in part, ''The radiocarbon sample was thus not part of the original cloth and is invalid for determining the age of the shroud.''

New tests that have been carried out in the University of Padua's laboratories by professors from various Italian universities, led by Giulio Fanti, Italian professor of mechanical and thermal measurement at the University of Padua’s engineering faculty, have dated the fibres from the cloth to a period between 300BC to 400AD.

>>964457

It's probably been Han Chinese for millennia.

>>964457
How did the Han Chinese even manage to be such a large ethnic group?

There also isn't much of a difference between Italians and Spaniards, but woe on you if you say they're the same.

How the hell did the Chinese convince people from such a vast area that they're somewhat similar countrymen?

Is it possible to discuss 'ethnic groups' apart from the identity concepts associated with them? How old is the concept of Han identity?

>>961440
Roman Empire
British Empire
Spanish Empire
Achaememid Empire
Mongol Empire

>>961461
im assuming thats in descending order of dankness?

also, future posters plz use numbered listings

>>961440
OP again, here's my own list

5. Mongoloids (1206-1368)
4. Burtish (1603-1997)
3. Romanians (27BC-1453AD)
2. USA!USA!USA! (1776-present)
1. Secret Reptilian Empire (????-present)

if you believe that you're fucking stupid

To clarify:

The author states that before the agricultural revolution humans and animals were at peace with nature. After we got trapped into settling down we started to accumulate diseases, hernias, arthritis and we became more violent. Not to mention we domesticated tons of animals and plans, and kept them in captivity.

The title is dramatic, but late hunter gatherers were better off than early farmers.