Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3316. page

Oh boy another race thread. And this one with a sexy woman as the OP pic.

Already off to a great start with the assumption that "white" is a race.

This should be good :^)

>>1345103
Do you have a reading deficit or something? Did I mention anything about a white race? I only added the cunt because she's Lebanese, A.K.A a Levantine.
Anon wtf are you on?

I'm just going to samefag for a bit, I don't know how long it takes for a thread to 404 on this board, it's my first time.

>>1358907
Can you give us an example of how its better? And how is Islam inherently feminist?

>>1358916
Islam is better because it is more coherent. Christians have never been able to follow Christianity because it is incoherent, but Muslims have generally been able to follow Islam.

Islam is feminist because unlike Western "feminism", it isn't about trying to convince women that acting like whores and sluts is what makes them equal (when in fact it is really men behind promoting such behavior, because men try to get women to give into sex naturally, and women try naturally to resist).

>>1358907
Thanks for the picture OP. I don't think I can find a better article on the internet that speaks to how Huffington Post is pure dogshit.

Masturbation: anything that does not lead to offspring.

>>1360868
The second thread link is false. It is not the first thread post.
http://desuarchive.org/his/thread/1293786/

>Go out of the world:
There are no people left to be the world. No one opposes a spiritual house that is correct. Or real right principles of what to do with lust.

>All is sin all is useless:
This is useless in the meaning of sin. Not as Ecclesiastes says.

>Lust is sin:
This is unfundable. There has to be a clear reason why.

>The whole christianity is seeing this wrong:
This is probably true. (...)
Or say or show something why not. That the whole of christianity is seeing this wrong is no reason why it would be right.

>>1360455
yes

>>1360455
no

>>1360455
maybe

File: SS Spurdo.png (40KB, 309x433px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 309x433px

What would make it any different from any other nation? It'd probably a fascist state so it'd probably rustle the jimmies of all nearby countries.

>>1360437
Yes. See North Korea. But it will need more land for farms to sustain it self and avoid nations sanctioning it.

literally any barbarian nation

If there is total dark, we would not see the rope so could not imagine it to be a snake. Hence “ignorance is bliss,” as in deep sleep - there can be no error. Similarly, if there is total light we see the rope clearly - in complete knowledge, we know everything to be Brahman. Knowledge is also bliss! The error occurs only in partial light or when the eyes are defective. Then there is partial knowledge; we know that some “thing” exists. This part, that is not covered by darkness or hidden by ignorance is called the “general part” (sAmAnya aMsha) and is “uncovered” or “real.” That the “thing” is actually a rope is hidden because of the inadequate light or knowledge. This specific feature of the thing, that it is a rope, is called the “particular part” (visheSha aMsha) and is covered. In place of the covered part, the mind substitutes or “projects” something of its own, namely the snake. In the example then, when we say “there is a snake,” there is a real part and an unreal part. The real part is “there is”; this is the “general part.” The unreal part, the snake, only appears to be there because the “particular part” - the rope - is covered. If light (i.e. knowledge) is made available, the rope is now seen. The “general part” - “there is” - remains unchanged but the “particular part,” which was previously projected by the mind, is now uncovered and revealed to be a rope. The snake has not “gone away” since it never existed, except in the mind of the observer, where it might have given rise to very real fears and physical effects (fast heartbeat, sweating etc.). From the point of view of actual reality (paramArtha), only the rope is real, the snake does not exist.

For a perceiver who sees a snake, that snake is “relatively” real (vyavahAra) and causes as much mental suffering as would a truly real snake. There only ever was a rope but the ignorance of this in the mind of the perceiver creates the illusion of a snake and the suffering follows. Once light (i.e. the light of knowledge) is introduced, the mistaken perception of the particular part is corrected; the unreal snake disappears and the real rope is revealed. The associated fear etc. also disappears. What has happened is that a valid means of enquiry has been undertaken into the nature of the particular part to reveal the truth of the matter. The valid means of enquiry in this example was the torchlight. It was appropriate because the mistake was brought about by the dim light. Prayer or meditation would not have been appropriate and would not have revealed the rope. The method has to be appropriate to the nature of the error. Since ignorance of our true nature is the reason for saMsAra, the appropriate means of enquiry for removing the error is self-knowledge.

When a mistake of this type occurs, what is happening is that a real part and an unreal part are getting mixed up and this is effectively how Shankara defines adhyAsa - the mixing up of real and unreal. In the case of the rope and snake analogy, the error can be viewed as a “misperceiving of the rope” or as the “superimposition of a snake” or as “the mixing of part of a real rope and part of an unreal snake.” When we say “there is a snake,” “there is” is the general part, which could be viewed as belonging to the rope, which is real, while “a snake” is the unreal, mentally projected, particular part. The mixing up of real and unreal effectively creates a third entity that is partly real and partly unreal. When someone refers to the “snake,” he does not realize that there are two aspects, one real and one unreal. If he says, “there is a long snake,” the adjective “long” in fact refers to the rope, which is real whilst, if he says “there is a poisonous snake,” the adjective refers to the unreal part. Similarly, when someone says: “I am a shopkeeper” (or whatever), he does not realize that the attribute “shopkeeper” refers to the unreal part. He does not know that there are two parts, only one of which (I am) is real.

>>1360269

Porque fue edificado con materiales de mierda

>>1360269
i don't know, i'm not from Guadalajara. ask google

>>1360294

ERES IGNORANTE, E IDIÓTICO.

>>1360268
He shot him. The Archduke asked his wife to not die for their children. In typical noblewoman fashion she denied this request.

The End.

He wanted to shoot him but missed his chance, went to drink in a bar, the archduke ended up driving past his bar, he got up and shot him and history was made

>>1360268
Archduke drives into main road.
Nedjelko fucks up throwing the bomb and it bounces off the hood of the Archduke's car and into the path of the motorcade behind.
Bomb explodes, Nedjelko tries to cyanide himself to death, but the cyanide was expired.
Motorcade reaces... I forget, and the Archduke's pissed.
Attempt is called off, but Gavrilo moves on with the plan.
Archdukes wanta to continue with whatever he wanted to do, so he tells his driver to go on.
Driver does not know that there was a change in plans, so he drives the Ferdinands on the old route.
Gavrilo's already waiiting for them, and he caps the Archduke and his wife with pic in OP.
Gavrilo tries to poison himself, but cyanide is expired.
Gavrilo is caught and Austro-Hungary uses that as casus belli to invade Serbia.
WWI.

>indigenous Anglo Saxons

>>1359953

ok I guess that should be part-indigenous instead of pure indigenous.

>>1359949
>vikings living in northern france
Stopped reading right there. Please read sources outside the isles

>>1359633
About the time photography obviated technique.

Art isn't about ideas, it's about being avant-garde. Avant-garde is the sum of valued content. Whether that is an idea or a feeling or just something that looks avant-garde doesn't really matter.

It happened when sculpture and painting were divorced from architecture.

The reason is that art and beauty stopped having a role in everyday life as people became more focused on utility.

Now art needs to have some extrinsic purpose to justify its existence rather than existing for its own sake. It has to make a political statement or drive "progress" in some way. Things that merely look nice do not hold much value in our society and people tend not to spend time on things that society doesn't not value.

>>1359495
>.gif

How did Hannibal know his cavalry would best their Roman counterparts?

Wouldn't his whole plan fall apart if his cavalry weren't able to complete the encirclement?

>>1359643
Because Roman cavalry was infamously terrible, and his own horsemen had kicked their asses before at battles like Trebia and Trasameine.

"Holy" literally means set apart. It means to be set apart from the rest of the world.

Something set apart, generally with respect t something set apart for God, but it can also apply to God himself as he it set apart from creation itself.

What is it to be "Roman"

File: 1381161794305.jpg (66KB, 609x480px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 609x480px

>>1359349
Not even joking.

Total meme saturation

Internal strife
Political instability
Economic instability
Costly military interventions
Insolvency of the service based economy

created the first international bank

>>1359334
It helped to rekindle trade between Europe and Asia. Also much information such as medicinal ones were obtained through the crusades.

In what way did the sack of Baghdad benefit the world?

File: This kills the Bulgar.jpg (54KB, 534x540px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 534x540px

>Nah fuck that
>Let's attack the Serbs over some shitty land in Macedonia
>Say no more senpai

>>1359273
>>1359276
Was 1912 Bulgaria *really* strong enough to take it 1v1 tho?

>>1359281
Clearly they were dumb enough considering the Second Balkan War...