Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3314. page

This is the consequence of materialism and the rejection of the metaphysical. Without spirituality and with the primacy of the ideologies of Darwinian evolution, the human experience becomes nothing but a struggle for survival that urges all human effort towards extermination and extinction.

>>1357320


Hitler was mad

>>1357362
I agree. We need a mystic revival. Humanity is ignoring half of existence.

>random massive "Swedish" in Finland

every time

>>1357068
that map triggers me

>>1357117
Why?

Whoever wants to make Komi (Republic in Russia) with me, message me ingame or on skype, my skype name is blyat_cyka

SERVER IS UP

>>1356843
holy shit finally

Only thing stopping you from banzai charging gaijin piggu with Arisaka is your lack of balls and dedication to the Tenno.

>>1356465
>you'll never make ruskies butthurt by invading kuril and sakhalin
but why the ruskies must be butthurted if they took again the islands and Japan is who today is bitching about it.

>You'll never be an Asian playing Western like a child plays dress-up.

>>1356183
Could you be precise with that shit ? I know the point was mainly to put them en masse for maximum efficiency but could a skilled marksman use this weapon accurately at a reasonably interesting distance ?

>>1356183
Handgunners are not that effective, you can't deploy them behind your infantry lines, only if they're in some kind of high ground..

>>1356278
>what are tercio

>>1355926
The alimony payments will kill you.

>>1355926
From a religious standpoint, I think you'd be hard pressed to find one that is okay with open marriage.

From a legal standpoint, I'm sure there's a tax issue or some bullshit.

Personally I don't think open relationships are a good idea. I've known a few people who've been involved in them and they usually devolve into some form of jealousy.

One of the two will get laid more than the other and it always causes problems.

>>1355926
Open marriages are not coded or sanctioned by law, they're taken as the expression of free will between between the two partners. The open marriage agreement happens privately, and it is considered by society as a private matter.

I think that is because the institution of marriage, as the representation of a particular societal order based on a nuclear or patriarchal family, is on the decline. The economic structure of western society has less use for traditional family structures and this is why it is eroding.

Regardless, the polygamy taboo still exists in our culture and law. I think the law will eventually support polygamy, but it will require a different group to support it. Open marriage people are enacting a very liberal set of values. And, in general, those values don't necessarily center around the importance of marriage as an institution. People that are for polygamy usually believe in a patriarchal system and are devoted to a conservative-religious set of values. Those people are less and less in western society, they will have to make polygamy acceptable through religious freedom legislature, not through "common sense" cultural believe in freedom of choice.

TL/DR: open marriage is private, non-sanctioned, and secular. Polygamy is a public contract (a form of marriage), usually religiously motivated, and patriarchal. All societal forms of decreasing strength and popularity.

Hon hon hon, le pay no attention to this, let's talk about le evil oppressive German invaders instead mon ami.

>>1355925
Because if you do it over 250 years no one will care

People only really care if you go full retard and annex half of Europe in 10 years

File: louis xiv.jpg (493KB, 971x1259px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 971x1259px

>>1355956
Well, European powers cared during Louis XIV's conquests
But they were simply no match

>>1355834
-cultural ceremony
-Under standing that other person was meaningful. not just something to mate with or be contact with because of hormones or genes determine it.
I cannot think anything else nor am I expert on this issue.

>>1355834
nice skull.

It reduced disease and cannibalism Im sure.

into the lake of fire you go

>>1355333

Trips confirm.

I was about to use this extract.

File: image.jpg (20KB, 342x430px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 342x430px

>>1355333
>>1355344

Trips and dubs. The lord has spoken.

Talking in general, Spaniards had shitload of native allies.
Besides that, they had steel weapons, firearms, steel armor, even war dogs.
Don't forget, Spain was literally Total War: The Country for centuries. They had long and awesome martial tradition.

>200 Spanish
all vets of wars against the moors and the french
>5000 Incan soldiers
never seen an horse a gun a culverin in action

The same thing happened in Africa 300 years later
Military discipline and higher technology
And also the biggest cojones in all history

File: lautaro_pedro_subercaseaux1.jpg (93KB, 468x617px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 468x617px

>>1353508
>icans
They were poor warriors indeed, look up for how they were organized, basically they had huge armies with poor training.

>Aztecs
these were actually good warriors, but they were doomed by the tech gap plus lots of enemies, plus what they believe (prophecies of their own end and stuff like that)


Natives in S.A had some success when they learned to ride and shot. Check out charruas, and Lautaro (pic related) he was some kind of strategy wonder boy.

File: Ingres_coronation_charles_vii.jpg (261KB, 800x1070px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 800x1070px

>>1352021
Joan of Arc, i don't need to say more

>>1352021
Then how come England lost the 100 years war?

>>1352021
Battle of Patay.

>>1350919
le function over form meme

Sometimes I wonder if in a few centuries people will look back and admire our architecture for whatever reason.
I can imagine some pretentious student going on about its "stoic simplicity" or something.

Of course it's just as possible everyone will look at the late 20th/early 21st century as an artistic dark age.

>>1350919
>I only go between my office and suburban house so the only buildings in the world are the ones I see while on thr bus

>>1348003
he was actually good

>>1348003
>Reactionaries
You can do better.

>>1348003
he had the most coherent programme for fascism

>>1363151
Schizophrenia

Well it's pretty explicit in the old testament in several places, but it's most overtly laid out in Romans 13

>>1363173
No tripfriends please.

He answers that extensively in his work.

A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.

He romanticized death