Why were eunuchs so often vilified in traditional Chinese historiography?
>>1362698
Because they came to hold a lot of power in the court, had a hand in all sorts of intrigues and were pretty self serving in general.
It actually has nothing to do with the fact that they're eunuchs, if another group composed of people with intact benis and balls did the same things they did they would be vilified as well. You couldn't criticize the Emperor for being a weak kuk of course.
>>1362698
Dunno.
Weren't they made eunuchs so they'd be more trustworthy? Because they couldn't start their own dynasty's and nepotism would be less of an issue?
Maybe it was a machismo thing. They weren't quite men but still had a lot of power and that raised a few alarms?
Non-men are the least trustworthy creatures.
Is this accurate?
No, it's clearly biased. Modern Judaism comes entirely from Pharisaic Judaism, this is presuming all ancient Judaism was Pharisaic.
>>1362004
Also, Islam obviously comes out of Christianity, since they consider Jesus to be the Messiah.
>>1362011
It shouldn't come out of it, but it should be connected via a dotted line?
Finally living my childhood dream and taking my first year of Greek and Roman studies at the University of Victoria in September.
What should I expect?
Also, university and education thread, I guess. Post yours, share stories/experiences.
>>1361755
Good on you. Getting into genetics in September. Found a pretty comfy apartment near the university.
"Just remember anon, a university is just like any other corporation. You need to be on the lookout for lies at all times, especially from your professors" - paraphrase of my Native American studies professor, he was right.
>>1361755
Nice one OP. What are you planning to do after college? Academia? If you're not planning to get a job in a field related to your degree, I'd advise you look into working part-time (so you can have a good few months of work-experience on your CV by the time you graduate) or learning a marketable, in-demand skill so you can easily find a job out of college and avoid the period of NEETdom that many anons find themselves in. Apparently employers value months/year of work-experience more than degrees even if it's in a completely pleb-tier job because it shows you had your shit together enough to work somewhere and not be fired.
Ok all you philosophy hipsters, who's the philosopher you really enjoy and think had some great things to say, but just never got the recognition they deserved?
Santayana for me, I find his materialism coupled with his intense love of the arts and humanities really appealing. I have a feeling that if modern popular atheism has followed his lead rather than Russell, we'd be better off.
Who are some others? I want some great, not as well known, dudes to read.
>>1361521
Bergson. totaly forgotten after the world war.
this spookyman
I wanted to share some of my writings which pertain to the nature of humanity and the people we hate in the world.
This thread is really bad.
>>1361263
damn son this is some edgy teenage shit right here
take off the fedora and try again
>>1361360
reminder that using buzz words like edgy and fedora is not an argument.
If you put aside all political bias, could you please redpill me on Margaret Thatcher? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Don't want a /pol/ discussion just the what she has done and set into place in the past.
>>1360892
She's a woman so she fucking sucks
>>1360892
>She was a politician
>OP does not want to discuss politics
Well I heard the Queen can do a great impression of her.
Isn't al-Ghazali responsible for the cultural and scientific stagnation of the Muslim world?
Let's see at his views:
- doctrine that everything happens because God wills it,
- condemnation od rationalism and inquiry of nature,
- condemnation od change and innovation.
Al-Ghazali was so persuasive that most of subsequent Muslim philosophy is basically a discussion over, about or against al-Ghazali, with proponents gaining the upper hand.
Also, Ghazali lived and worked in 11th century - the temporal coincidence with the beginning of the decline of Muslim world is striking.
Sure was. Funny how occasionalism is dominant in Islam to this day yet never mentioned when discussing Islam's compatibility with western civilization.
>>1360805
>Isn't al-Ghazali responsible for the cultural and scientific stagnation of the Muslim world?
Ghazali, Ibn taymiyya, and more gerenally all muslims scholars who didn't belong to Persia, Baghdad or Al-Andalus.
>>1360805
No. Occasionalism was never a doctrine to begin with, but an exercise in refuting the views of some of his opponents on observation and causality using their own logical tools. He did not condemn rationalism or inquiry of nature either, nor did he condemn change and innovation.
What was persuasive about al-Ghazali was the way he used Greek tools of logic in understanding Islamic doctrine and theology, something which the likes of Ibn Taymiyya condemned. He had nothing to do with the cultural or intellectual decline of the Muslim world.
I wanted to start a discussion about who you guys think were the greatest military leaders of all time. I didn't know if I should define is as "greatest military mind" or leader, as I feel there is a difference. So you can take it however you want, based on battlefield prowess, organizational, administrative skills, ability to inspire troops etc.
I'm also interested in opinions on which of the traits I mentioned before are the most important for Military success (i know this differs greatly by the period of warfare.) Tech and then tactics I would think is the obvious first choice. I'm wondering about examples where a commander was able to defeat an enemy with superior strategy AND numbers, maybe even superior tech too, simply through having a more inspirational effect on his men, and troops more inspired to fight for their cause.
The closest thing that comes to my mind is Robert the Bruce.
Here are my top 5 in order: Probably the safest, most generic picks ever. Oh well.
1.Napoleon
2. Alexander
3. Genghis Khan
4. Hannibal
5. Julius Caesar
Honorable mentions: Erwin Rommel, Stonewall Jackson, Themistocles, Leonidas, Robert E. Lee, George Washington, Nathanael Greene, Eisenhower, Oda Nobunaga, Tokugawa Ieyasu, Atilla the Hun, Patton, William T. Sherman.
As you can see, my scope is blindingly biased toward the ancient world, as well as older American leaders. Looking to broaden it. Didn't mention Sun Tzu by the way, as I know nothing about him.
Genghis Khan, or world ruler devastating invasions of Asia destroyed Muslim civilisations and tilted the balance for the first time in favour of Christian Europe – one unintended consequence of a career that would also change Russia, India and China, making Temujin probably the most influential human in history
>>1360411
>George Washington
>Erwin Rommel
>Leonidas
Such a kind thing for you to alert us from the get-go that this is a meme thread.
And where are my babies Wolfe and de Montfort?
>>1360418
Do you feel that Subutai diminishing his greatness at all? I've read some people who think Genghis wouldn't have been near the man he was without him.
>>1360444
It's not a troll thread man. I was careful to alert you guys as to my ignorance of History, so it wouldn't be seen as so by more knowledgeable people. I know Leonidas is forever meme tier with all the over statements of his badassery, and that shitty movie, but from what I know, he had merits. I know the initial force sent in were basically the Persian pleb soldiers, but holding formation, and slaughtering them was a pretty impressive show of his men's trust in him. Then they fucked up the 'immortals' in the same manner. From what I know Xerxes with rather flustered, and it wasn't until the betrayal of the hidden pass that this massive force was able to break them. I think a man who could command such loyality among a darwinian warrior culture has some merits to him. Him and the few thousand Athenians/others who stayed until they end and gave Athens time, impress me. I'm not somewhat caught up in his hollywood tier myth.
>Erwin Rommel
Make an argument against him. Not like I put him top 5. From what I know his failures were more a results of higher up administrative meddling. Were there any more competent German generals in WWII in your opinion?
>George Washington
I caterigize him as a great General as a result of multiple factors combining into one. Took up this seemingly hopeless war as some random Colonel from the French and Indian war. I have to imagine if you were in that room, you'd think the cause fucked. Washington was a very lucky general in my opinion. Napoleon's quote “I know he's a good general, but is he lucky?” make me think of him. He started out with some pretty bad losses, unconventional hit and run war fare etc. The fact that the guy, prior had not once commanded an army of any real size, and was often fighting with less than zero supplies, and untrained
It's Canada day and I've never felt less cheerful. After seeing the way Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Edmonton have become and the recent anthem change I feel my attachment to my home country is finally broken. Literally the only thing we have to tie us all together is a sport on ice.
Can anyone think of any historical events since the Korean war that are worth being proud of?
Ay.
>>1359291
Canada is not a real country.
>>1359291
Canadabro in US. Can confirm; morale is at an all time low.
>tfw PK subban is a Nashvillian now
>Axes were never used in combat, unless you consider a tree a worthy opponent haha. Swords? The most popular last resort weapon in history, not used as often as people think though. Spears, now this is where it's at, the most effective weapon to have ever existed. I mean, you can poke people with it!
Why do people take this guy seriously?
>>1362176
Spears and pikes were pretty much the most important melee weapons, though.
>>1362176
Spears where the most commonly used weapon in history. Swords are considered to be the most commonly used by the general population however this isn't true. axes, whilst used they where not a common weapon by any means nor where they particularly effective.
I was under the impression that spears weren't exactly the most effective weapon, just more cost-effective and easier to mass produce.
How do we prevent the Americanisation of history before it's too late?
>>1367450
Crashing the american empire
With no survivors
>>1367450
>being for the revision of history and denying of American importance
>>1367467
Germans would have been defeated with or without the Americans.
Even Britain's contribution was more important.
>we wuz kingz 'n shiet
Well Nubia which neighboured Egypt was a black civilization and 25th dynasty of Egypt originated from Nubia so there were black pharaohs
BUT
they have fuck all to do with ameriniggers who mostly come from countries that developed nothing
so as usual both nigs and /pol/ were retarded
>>1367431
Common knowledge. What is this thread for?
>>1367431
I'm white, but does that mean I'm related to Kings of Europe?
Maybe, but more likely my ancestors were all a bunch of shit and lice covered peasants.
>>1367431
>so as usual both nigs and /pol/ were retarded
[spoiler]The important thin is you found a way to feel superior to both.[/spoiler]
Is time linear? What even is time?
It isn't what but when.
>>1367206
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OvltlOA8XE
>>1367206
Time is an illusion that man created to better percieve the order of events as they happened around them.
Seeing as Christianity is cucked beyond repair, and seeing as atheism leads to death, what religion could cause a Western Renaissance?
>Islam
Out of the question.
>Paganism
Based. Strong morals. Too particularist though. Could degenerate into petty bickerings between ingroups and vulnerability to divide and conquer tactics.
We want something that is just enough particularist as to allow for the exclusion of otherkin, and just enough universal as to embrace all Westerners.
>Hellenic Paganism
All the positives associated with Norse Paganism, but with a much larger collection of ancient texts. History of ancient Greece and Rome. Tended to see other people's gods are their own, so easily adaptable. (Ex: Celtic Taranis = Jupiter.)
>Buddhism
Seeks the end of suffering, not of sin/guilt. It can be especially based in the Evolian interpretation, namely that it was an exclusive religion of and for the Aryans. Emphasis on the individual rather than the collective can lead to the same faults are Christianity. Dangerously compassionate. Can easily degenerate into cuckoldry and acceptance of otherkin.
>Thelema
Interesting. Emphasizes will-power. Also endorsed by Evola. Vast wealth of medieval, renaissance and modern occult literature to go with it. Dangerously Masonic, Judaic and Egyptian symbolism could degenerate into cosmopolitanism, exoticism and openness to otherkin. Individualist (see Buddhism).
>>1365139
Some mix of hellenic polytheism and thelema probably.
>>1365139
the west had its time, and its now colapsing and eating itself....no religion can revive it.....if anything the only religion that might unite large chunks of the west might be stupid versions of fundamentalist christianity that might make us slide back
also, paganism isnt a religion, its a collection of religious practices, modern 'paganism' is a naive fantasy
helenistic paganism has no bareing on modern peoples and is too thought of as mythology and history to come back
islam has no real traction in the west culturaly
and budhism has the abve problem of cultural traction
you need to acept that the world is about to change its axis and the west will fall slowly but surely
>>1365139
>Islam
>Out of the question
Not quite, according to the founder of Thelema and certain later adherents but that's a long and convoluted story.
>Paganism
Almost a meaningless designation without further specificity. Could mean anything or nothing.
>Hellenic Paganism
I do think the later Neoplatonic and GMP materials are pretty based. If you wanted a group more inclined toward "renaissance", these are probably it.
>Buddhism
I have no clue why any serious Buddhist practitioner would give a wet shit about revitalizing any given culture.
>Thelema
1) If you can't handle the Egyptian, Kabbalistic, and to a lesser extent Freemasonic materials it's rooted in then it's not for you. 2) Evola didn't REALLY endorse that shit, and if you want to take a right-leaning perspective on the practices I recommend Fuller and Pessoa (i.e. Brazilian Integralism), though I would also question any approach to Thelema that favors traditionalism over synchretism and I doubt actual Adepts are any more interested in cultural revitalization than any given Buddhist.
What's the best model for economic growth right now?
The China model? The Japan/Korea model? Or the post-Communist Poland/Czechia model? Or something else?
I think it is the model of the basic income. Supplemented with work. This sort of thing stands the strongest.
>>1364457
Well if you want to industrialize...
Its state capitalism all the way.
Ur madre, senpai