Why was Germany so successful in the invasion of Western Europe?
Daladier and Chamberlain were knobs who never took the German threat seriously.
>>1357866
France went full retard with their maginot line and Britain....well, Britain is Britain, don't expect them to fight a land war without a strong ally to do the heavy lifting for them (France had this role in WW1 but failed to be that in WW2)
>they won't go through Belgium this time, trust me
Why are Roman coins so cheap on ebay?
They sell for next to nothing. You can get a legit Roman coin for a few British pounds.
Are they really that easy to find?
How can you be sure that those are real Roman coin?
On ebay you should assume that everything is fake unless proven otherwise.
>>1357764
>Are they really that easy to find?
Yes. A few hours with a metal detector in some places in Britain will get you a dozen or so.
Most won't be very good quality though.
>>1357764
Most are Chinese fakes
>tfw unironically born in le wrong generation :(
Whats her name /his/?
>>1357382
22nd century
>>1357382
I don't know op, the current year is pretty good
>>1357391
>being a reverse contrarian
Tell me about Scottish Highlanders /his/.
>>1357378
Sadly romanticized.
>>1357378
Very romanticized
>>1357378
Disgustingly romantivised
Is this channel bullshit or not? I need to know it because i will use some of his videos as source for a project work.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RealCrusadeHistory
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/30oi83/what_is_the_consensus_on_real_crusades_history/
This may help
>>1357343
Not OP but IIRC that doesn't really say much. He essentially says he's biased but doesn't do anything to actually prove RCH wrong.
>>1357302
I dunno. He has real historians on the show with him and he uses legit historical sources. How valid any of these are? I don't know, really. It would be fun if somone did a point by point debuking of his videos instead of just screaming about islamophobia.
>>1357343
How would the alphabet of an internet civilization develop?
For example, the Eastern Asian languages of Chinese and Japanese use such flowing characters because they're painted with ink on scrolls.
Korean hangul is so squareish because it was developed by writting in ceramic.
Latin alphabet is very sharp shaped lines because they were developed out of writting in rocks and the like.
How would a completely original language from the internet develop like? How would it sound, and look like, if we had to create something of our own using computers and the internet only, rather than just speaking formerly created languages in the web?
>>1357300
Then how the hell did Georgian alphabet originate?
>>1357300
That's a fascinating question but I have no real idea..
Two things I've noted about computer fonts though:
- as you said, East Asian scripts were made to be painted on scrolls and such, so they're basically giant characters and thus they're really hard to read at low font sizes (the most complex characters can actually show up as black squares.) Other scripts are easier to read at low font sizes without straining your eyes or zooming in, on top of being simpler to draw and print, and I expect a native internet alphabet to be like that.
- characters having similar widths matters little when they're written by human hands but very important for the text to look good on screen, and ideally two lines with the same number of characters would have the same length with the characters neatly lined up (irrespective of case too). This is something Asian scripts generally do better than Latin scripts by the way. There are equal-width fonts for all languages.
I also expect the internet language to be camel-cased.
With computer screens, pixels can take not only inumerous shapes, but also colours.
In adition to that, information on a screen can move.
When you write something on a sheet of paper, the text is static. But with the internet, you have access to .gifs, videos, .webms and so on.
I think that every word or idea would be expressed by a square that could be as small as a pixel, and each of these units would flash different colours in different sequences.
So for example, a pixel (or larger square made up of other pixels) could flash the sequence red-blue-green, and this would mean "dog".
Then the next pixel just right of the first one is flashing green-blue-red, and that means "barks".
Something like a very long text would look like a lot of squares alligned, and each of them would be flashing different lights.
Can we have a history literature recommendation thread?
Recommend any history books, documentaries, or papers here that you found interesting and educational.
I'd recommend 1491 for a basic overview of precolombian way of life. It seems very well cited and it's a fun read.
Also could anyone suggest any good books or documentaries about ancient Americas, Egypt, China, or Slavic people? Or anything history related since I don't know much in general.
Here's a video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhKYg641K3c
>>1357279
Tell me about this book
Why was Italy in the past 400 years shit while the rest of Western Europe was boss
Because being the richest people from 500 BC to 1650 AD made them stop giving a single fuck
>>1357216
I'm a vegan
>>1357211
>the rest of Western Europe was boss
Italy is Southern Europe, not Western
Themoreyouknow.png
What are the best books about politics?
>>1357102
Depends what kind of politics. The Republic is a necessary starting point. You're better off if you come to terms with the fact that Thrasymachus was right about everything.
>>1357102
>>1357109
Is Islam just a Christian heresy?
>>1356946
No, it's a Jewish heresy's heresy.
>>1356946
It was seen as such in the middle ages, at least by some. But I don't think that a religion that doesn't consider Jesus Christ to be God can be called christian, not even heretically christian.
Judaism + christianity + zoroastrism = Islam
Why weren't the Nuremberg Judges from neutral countries?
>>1356833
Forgot to add: The Allied countries should have been prosecutors only, not judges.
>>1356833
>crying over dead war criminals
Because neutral judges couldn't be trusted to give the correct verdict of "guilty."
What about the gooks, chinks, and japs were so impressive that the Dutch and British have spawned generations of cuck-aboos.
>no philosophical contribution
>muh efficient beauracracy (that still failed them)
>economic surge in the 20th century due to Western support
Why did the land the of Hobbes, Adam Smith, Kierkegaard hold these rice niggers in any positive regard?
>>1356827
Probably how quick the Japanese adapted to the changing world despite not being European and being isolated.
Also China being China
>no philosophical contributions
Nice b8 m8
>>1356888
Come on. What novel contribution did they make that really enhanced our search for answers that wasn't "just roll with it;suffering is lyfe"
Why couldn't Japan defeat China that was divided and fighting each other?
>>1356700
There are millions of people in China alone? The civil war basically stopped and everyone averted their eyes to the Japanese menace. Japan probably would've eventually succeeded had they not pissed off the European powers.
>>1356718
>The civil war basically stopped and everyone averted their eyes to the Japanese menace.
Get a load of this guy lol.
>>1356700
A full campaign into China would require resources that Japan couldn't make on its own. When the allies made it clear they wouldn't be supporting Japan in any manner by embargoing their oil, they were doomed from the start.
Do you find yourself fascinated with various specific eras in history? If so, which ones and why?
The Victorian Era interests me a lot due to the huge amount of change going on throughout the time period. Also I like reading and learning about the Great Game which occurred during that era.
>>1356518
only pseuds like the 19th century
>>1356521
Okay.
so i was wondering about historical warfare
as far as i understand the 3 popular melee weapons were axes, swords and warhammers/maces
what were the benefits/negatives to each weapon type ?
why would you use one over the other ?
also, how good were polearms/how often where they used ?
what was the best to use for cavalry?
and lastly, how good was armor against guns in the 18th and 19th century ?
(pic unrelated)
>>1356434
Just watch scholagladiatoria on youtube. Like really m8.
What period are you talking about? "historical" doesn't really tell us much as there is a lot you could be talking about.