Why are educated people less likely to take risks compared to not so educated people?
Lets use a fictional example, the batman's father/mother being robbed by a gunman. The father was willing to rationalize and give the robber all the money, yet the robber was very irrational and shot/killed both the father/mother without hesitation.
In some cases, the lesser educated benefits tremendously from these risks. Why don't educated people make risks like these? Or is it the less educated don't know about the risk and simply "do it"?
>>1693402
Education system is designed to make you a useful 'tool' for the benefit of society. Individuals who takes risks are not so useful to society because they cannot be controlled as easily as the obedient ones who don't take risks nor behave in risky manners.
Basically, educated minds are conditioned to not take the risks.
>>1693402
I don't know if this is the right board for this but i would think it comes down to how much these risks correlates the persons perceived chances of survival or asking the question "what do i have to lose" in some intances all people have to lose is their life, this may cause them to act irattionally.
that is my take on it , I am not sure it is the right answer though to your question
>>1693402
Because the intelligent people can make that amount of money in a few hours of work in a comfy office instead of taking on a chance of being killed or going to prison.
If you don't understand what risk is kys
Toyotomi Hideyoshi threated Spain to invade the Philippines. But was it possible for Japan at that time to invade the Philippines and defeat Spain ?
>>1693376
Not with those crappy ships they don't. They wont even make it to Southeast Asia alive facing the sea alone.
>>1693376
If he could court some other European naval powers, he might be able to.
Japan was at the peak of its power during his time. With the whole country under his control, if he played his diplomacy right, other European nations would jump at the opportunity to see their rivals gone and have more influence in Japan.
the real question is "how good was the Spanish hold on the Philippines, and how much did the natives and nearby states like having the Spanish there?"
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-shifted-blame-to-fat.html
>The sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960s to play down the link between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, newly released historical documents show.
>The internal sugar industry documents, recently discovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, and published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, suggest that five decades of research into the role of nutrition and heart disease, including many of today’s dietary recommendations, may have been largely shaped by the sugar industry.
>“They were able to derail the discussion about sugar for decades,” said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at U.C.S.F. and an author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper.
>The documents show that a trade group called the Sugar Research Foundation, known today as the Sugar Association, paid three Harvard scientists the equivalent of about $50,000 in today’s dollars to publish a 1967 review of research on sugar, fat and heart disease. The studies used in the review were handpicked by the sugar group, and the article, which was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, minimized the link between sugar and heart health and cast aspersions on the role of saturated fat.
>The Harvard scientists and the sugar executives with whom they collaborated are no longer alive. One of the scientists who was paid by the sugar industry was D. Mark Hegsted, who went on to become the head of nutrition at the United States Department of Agriculture, where in 1977 he helped draft the forerunner to the federal government’s dietary guidelines. Another was Dr. Fredrick J. Stare, the chairman of Harvard’s nutrition department.
>Harvard’s Dr. Hegsted reassured the sugar executives. “We are well aware of your particular interest,” he wrote, “and will cover this as well as we can.”
fucking jews, man
Getting your nutrition science from Americans is like getting your statecraft from communists
>>1693226
Sugar is extremely bad for you, as is fat. Learn how your body works and stop taking health advice from people trying to sell you something.
>>1693268
Hard not to when many people are sent off into the world with a mediocre health class or two and companies make a particular effort t make their preferred views "common knowledge".
>Jews
I wonder what OP will do when he finds out they aren't the only group interested in making money at the expense of others?
Hitler was a kapitalist schwein and a disgrace to real National Socialism. Prove me wrong.
>>1693152
Who was the real representor of national socialism then?
>>1693152
>real national socialism has never bean tried :-DDD
>>1693181
Ernst Rohm and the Strassers. Duh.
They say that the two saddest words in history are 'if only'...
>>1693123
y-you too
>>1693123
If only there was no & Humanities
>>1693148
this board was great for a month
and then the humanities caught up
>"nothing lasts forever"
then what makes love the exception?
pls needs to nos
>>1693106
Love isn't the exception. It's just romanticization we use to comfort us when we know that we're going to die and be forgotten by those we hold closest.
>>1693366
makes cents
~ All moments of consciousness: something in common
No subject without object, no object without subject
Known with knower, knower with known
~
~ In thought you cut away all you could: all images, all feeling
All similar data and dissimilar data discovered in life
But could not think away consciousness
~
~
~ And its split between perceiver and perception, self/data
An original seeming mystery: maybe unexplainably basic
And regardless whether mind exists only with physics or not
~ Division: fundamental layer of knowledge is an opposition
“I am conscious of x” and “x” could be the world or my dreams
Or my mood or my concepts or this fact that I am conscious
~
~ And “I” might be this brain, or might be caused by this brain
And this brain might instead depend on “I”
But regardless “I” is the thinker, yet “‘I’” can be thought of
~
~
~ You think of your self, “I am conscious,” “I am aware of myself”
There is the I, then the myself: subject/object, knower/known
There is consciousness, and there are its elements: I/x
~ Then when you know your self, when “I am self-conscious”
Who or what is the knower and who or what is being known?
Your self is known, but the knower is opposed to the known.
~
~ Introspect: you are conscious of hopes and doubts
And what is imagined and emoted and remembered
And all this personality of you is known by the unknown knower
~
~
~ And all outside: all touched and all watched in whatever ways
Are done so due to that knower, that knows the objects of space
As similar and as dissimilar, as in common and as divided
~ This division now though is between all your objects
An opposition not between subject/object, as was first
But between object x versus object y: both known by the subject
~
~ This division between objects that burrow versus objects that fly
Those conceived as rising versus those conceived as flowing
Some thought to behave thusly while others behave non-thusly
~
~
~ These: dissimilarities that yet rest on similarities, layered under
Something in common that allows for this abstract division
Burrows or flies, it lives: living or inert, it is real
>I'll tell you what you did with Atheists for about 1500 years. You outlawed them from the universities or any teaching careers, besmirched their reputations, banned or burned their books or their writings of any kind, drove them into exile, humiliated them, seized their properties, arrested them for blasphemy. You dehumanised them with beatings and exquisite torture, gouged out their eyes, slit their tongues, stretched, crushed, or broke their limbs, tore off their breasts if they were women, crushed their scrotums if they were men, imprisoned them, stabbed them, disembowelled them, hanged them, burnt them alive.
What events was she referring to?
>>1692992
Sounds more like what they'd do to heretics.
>>1692992
Sounds like what was done to religious people throughout the ages.
>>1692992
Is that Steve Wozniak?
>That feel when you accept First Cause but all religions seem total bullshit
Just be a deist, it's easy
>>1692949
Then you're a Deist?
It's fine if some want to accept the first cause as logically consistent. But the actual existence of a Deistic god remains nothing more than a philosophical argument.
/his/... tell me about Al-Andalus.
>tfw you see a medieval swastika and you're still kinda freaked out by it even though it's obviously not related to the Holocaust
Could humans be considered ''low-tier'' hive mind?
>>1692851
Maybe.
>>1692851
high tier : sas regiment
mid tier : board members
low tier : traffic
energy can't ever be created or destroyed, only change form, thats our current understanding, no? so until that changes, yes
>>1692872
But we still have mind of our own and act for ourselves
I don't want to kms, but I can't find any meaning. I've lost my drive to go on.
I'm not highly educated, I previously wanted to persue a higher education on my own via books, but I've lost even that drive.
I'm socially disconnected, I think I'm losing my sanity. I thought I was retarded last week. Then I thought I had microcephaly.
What do I do /his/? How do you keep going on?
>>1692739
Conquer Constantinople?
>>1692739
By all means, there is no meaning at all in life. Even if there is, there is no way for you or men to know it and thus from our point of view its irrelevant.
Enjoy your newfound nihilism.
>>1692762
What's the point of existing in a nihilistic state?
I've come to the conclusion that we are just chemicals and what not, death or the abrupt halt of these chemicals, wouldn't be so bad.
Also, where can I learn more about nihilism?
So i'm half Maltese but do not know much about my people
all i know is that they were heavily bombed in ww2 by Nazi Germany and i think Italy
country has Muslim and christian influences
>share knowledge
British colony up until about 1964 I believe.
Fighting took place there or around there in ww1 and Japan actually helped defend it
>>1692679
Basically, if an Empire existed, it invaded you at some point.
Knights of Malta were extremely badass, maybe the most badass of any "Crusaders".
In the end, your name is in one of the greatest fucking movies of all time
Think of the language as English but with semitic instead of germanic and Italian instead of French
Why did the polish lithuanian fail? Did it had a chance?
>>1692629
it was a (prussian [teutonic] centric) history-pulse that served its ROI
> Poland-Lithuania
> Austria-Hungary
I see a pattern here...
The governmental system was retarded and rival powers could just bribe noblemen to call the government body (Sejm) off whenever it met.
What is the point of keeping the Moseic Laws in Judaism? Jews have no concept of hell, only (maybe) non-existence for the worst of people, but otherwise you only have to be a moral person to be able to live again in a paradise on Earth after the Messiah comes. This applies to everyone regardless of faith or how they practiced it.
>>1692625
Non-Jew but my general understanding is that halakha is important because it comes directly from God and by following it you respect the partnership between God and man.
>>1692625
>Hell is the main moral motivator for a lot of ancient people's morality
This is how stupid you sound.
Why do greeks, chinks, romans have morality when everyone is going to the same afterlife?
>>1692625
Jews don't keep the mosaic laws.
if it was the case, we should see them stoning adulterers, killing apostates, and so on.