Why should you never get involved in a land war in Asia?
>>1700713
Its a cold war axiom.
Since Mainland Asia is pretty much the turf of communist powers at the time.
idk OP
too many competing interests?
Inhospitable terrain outside of urban centers. Willingness of its inhabitants to participate in partisan/guerilla actions.
Why Europeans didn't invented mud buildings? Just imagine being able to build house from a literally nothing instead of damaging ecosystem by destroying forests or spending unjustified amounts of effort and waste lives to dig for quality rocks in caverns. Why not just simply terraform the earth into a comfy habitable structure?
>>1700709
um try again sweetheart :*
>>1700709
Majority of medieval europeans lived in Mud Houses
There were loads of trees everywhere
You use what's available
The Norse of Iceland lived in sod houses
Could we stop WW III from happening ?
>>1700642
No
>>1700642
"We" have been stopping it from happening for 50+ years.
Absolutely no. Two forces (Fascism and Communism) would be coming closer to each other and the conflict would be inevitable.
ITT we invent a historical fact. Others point out if it's true.
>bubonic plague carriers were trained to use the flute as a means of assassination
>>1700637
Sassanid Persians were disgusted by the Greeks' boyfucking habits and used it in simplistic propaganda against them
>>1700637
>Jesus was actually chinese and had a brother named Hong Xiuquan
>>1700637
The Jesuit missions to China encountered Jews who had never heard of Christianity.
>ruthlessly exploit, kill, maim, and enslave natives, reducing population by 50% (10 million dead)
>decades later give them their independence
>decide you don't like their democratically elected leader because he wants to actually have the major companies and natural resources to be owned by Congolese people
>have him killed and a brutal authoritarian dictator installed in his place, destroying any chance for your former colonial subjects to have a functioning state
>deal with all of this by pretending it never happened and burying all records of it
Is Belgium low-key the worst country in the history of the world?
The guy was just bored. Guy just wanted to practice statecraft.
Well, it is certainly pretty impressive to outdone Stalin and Mao in deadlines even if you lack in a scale.
>>1700628
Not an argument.
FRONT RANK, FIRE!
Why did the Europeans invade Africa, and the Africans not invade Europe?
I hope this isn't serious.
To answer your question, they weren't as organized as your standard European nation back then, plus their military was nowhere near that of the European one. Numbers was their only advantage.
The first muslim invasion of the Iberian peninsula was led by a Berber general
>>1700551
Africans invaded europe a bunch of times
Which seat of power was greatest in Southeast Asia?
I would say Angkor and Srivijaya were great for its time. Even surpassing their mother civilizations from mainland South Asia in glory and sophistication .
Later Ayuttaya and Majapahit were dominant forces
Burma was stronk, but they were mainly just occasional invaders
>>1700359
>I would say Angkor and Srivijaya were great for its time. Even surpassing their mother civilizations from mainland South Asia in glory and sophistication .
ok.
>>1700359
Khmer Empire existed longer than Ottomans. So they are pretty based.
Bagan :DDDD
Is this true, /phi/?
>>1700307
b closer to this desu senpai
>>1700307
>>1700920
"No human thing is of serious importance"
sigh...........
ITT: Post good historical quotes
wise, funny, ominous, whatever
Wallace was pretty funny desu. Sucks people only remember him from the civil rights era and forget when he fucked the democrats in the ass during the 1972 primaries.
>>1700300
Wallace was based. Theres that story of some hippy calling him a fascist and he just said "I was killing fascist while you were shitting your diapers"
"I told you so"
Were these men as really good and pure as people make them out to be or were they corrupt like anyone else?
The reason I ask is because I have read the declaration and constitution, it's all very free and wonderful stuff but I'm really rather suspicious of this narrative. It tends to be that this shit is usually just glorification rather than truth.
So, were these guys really the pure rational men they are made out to be?
Some of the them were pretty good.
Some of them were willing to grab power at the first chance. The Federalists were pretty shitty.
At the end of the day, the constitution is just a piece of paper, and is unable to prevent corruption and evil.
>Were these men as really good and pure as people make them out to be or were they corrupt like anyone else?
You're going to have to be a bit more specific considering you are referring to a great deal of people but the high profile ones that everyone likes to talk about (Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, Washington etc.), were products of their time representing different ideals of their time. They were mostly upper-class, idealistic, educated land-owners. While the government they built wasn't completely free of contradiction, (all men are created equal but we stil have slaves) they managed to create a peaceful passing of power, which was a big deal at the time. I'm sure other people can explain this better but i'm tired.
>>1700216
>The Federalists were pretty shitty.
No? The Federalist had plenty of valid reasons. Read The Federalist Papers
>>1700169
unless they reinvented the wheel i doubt it
Ancient Rome was vastly superior to Ancient Greece you all can suck my fabians.
>>1699970
I disagree.
>>1699970
Sassanian Empire was superior to Rome in all regards. They actually had a sense of morality unlike you barbarians.
I mean like every aspect, the little things most people don't notice.
>>1699944
You don't. They're retarded. The character of Bugs Bunny is even too complex for them to fully appreciate.
>>1699944
& humanities was a mistake
I propose we change /literature/ to /literature & humanities/
>>1699954
How so?
Why are there so many mortal sins?
We're basically all guaranteed to go to hell. No one outside of the god damn Pope has a chance of getting into heaven.
>>1699932
Early Chirstian communities were arguably stricter.
The cynic in me says that its because guilt and fear are an excellent way to keep cult members loyal
>>1699932
You can't earn your way into heaven. That's the fundamental point of Christianity. Even the pope has sinned mortally.
Only Jesus was without sin.
>>1699932
>what is confession
>what is repentance
What was India like immediately after gaining independence? How did it become what it is today?
>inb4 poo in loo
>>1699923
pee in lee
>>1699923
It was busy creating the Indian """""""""nation"""""""" by telling all those independent princely states that they are all "Indian" now apparently.
Anyone can explain me what made Gustavus Adolphus so great? How did he manage to turn Sweden from a backwater to a force to be reckoned with? What was special about his battle strategy, tactics and organisation?
>>1699871
It has something to do with cannons. I think he used small swivel cannons drawn by horse. This essentially acted mobile artillery that was deployed where ever needed.
>>1699871
Yearts of getting his ass-handed by Poland-Lithuania.
Until he became that good that he could hit back.
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/17thcentury/articles/geniusofsweden.aspx
When covered in short, volley fire is the main point my professor pointed to.
Good read.