How would you explain normal life to a retarded person?

>>1699944
You don't. They're retarded. The character of Bugs Bunny is even too complex for them to fully appreciate.

>>1699944
& humanities was a mistake

I propose we change /literature/ to /literature & humanities/

>>1699954
How so?

>>1699961
Bugs is brilliant and witty. Retards see a rabbit with a funny voice that does funny things to the bad guys. Seriously, have you never encountered retarded people before?

>>1699986
>have you never encountered retarded people before?
Where do you think you are?

>>1699994
Truuuue.

>>1699957

>>>/qa/

>>1699986
But everything is up for personal interpretation. To you Buggs may be brilliant, to me he may be symbolism for how animal rights activist feel about hunters.

How does one come to the final, true conclusion of brilliance rather than the latter?

>>1699944
how would you explain reality to a normal person?

answer: you can't. people of average intelligence are not capable enough of processing a sufficient amount of information

>>1700048
I fail to see how either of those are incompatible. You're just separating aspects of the character and trying to contrast them in a manner that is inappropriate. .

File: Karl Brandt Nuremberg Trials.jpg (209KB, 1392x1112px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1392x1112px

>>1699944

You direct them to the loving care of Dr. Karl Brandt.

>>1699944
I've never been able to get through to a creationist so I wouldn't know.