>yfw you realize most normalfags have fixed beliefs set in stone and will simply discard anything out of hand that contradicts their beliefs even going so far as being skeptical of basic established facts
That's why they should be reasoned with in terms of their own ignorance.
>>2569380
that's everyone tho
we all suffer form elitism
>>2569412
You mean suffer FROM elitism, you fucking plebian.
It disgusts me that someone of my level has to share this website with lowlifes such as yourself.
I, for one, do not suffer from elitism.
>Timur the lame
What did they mean by this?
He was pretty wack at the skate park.
>>2569287
his leg was fucked up
>>2569287
He was a total fucking dweeb.
Then the nerd rage kicked in.
Was Tuchman the greatest American Historian of all time?
No, she was a biased Jewess and probably a communist spy too.
>>2569260
>biased
how so?
>>2569251
The fact that she worked from secondary sources instead of archives disqualifies her.
Hey /his/! I just found this m1 helmet in my basement but I can't figure out what era it's from. I know it's not ww2 because of the chinstrap so I'm thinking Vietnam era. What do you guys think?
And I also fucked up the picture because I'm not used to doing this on mobile
>>2569146
You have a much better chance on /k/
>>2569157
This. Those heavily armed autists will know for sure
When did you grow out of your byzaboo stage and realise that the Western Roman Empire was superior in every way?
>>2569066
>superior
>collapses
>>2569069
>it lasted longer therefore it is superior
>>2569066
Never had it in all honesty because Byzantine history is kind of boring. WRE collapses, then it's 200 years of autistic arguing over monophysitism before they spend 800 years very slowly getting their shit pushed in by goat fucking desert barbarians and constantly calling on Western Europe to save them.
The WRE as a whole, even the final century, is more interesting to learn about.
Was Hitler really that bad as an artist?
no, he apparently wasn't very clever though and just going through with the motions isn't enough
The Shading here is fucked.
Shadows all wrong.
He had potential but was egotistical as hell.
He probably made hundreds of these ala sweatshop, only way to explain such ridiculous mistakes.
The dismantling of the Ottoman Empire and the rise of Arab Nationalism is the biggest disaster of the 20th century.
While Arabs were kept under the turks, religious stability in the middle east was at a decent level. Jews, Muslims and Christians lived in relative peace. The first world war and the subsequent sykes-picot agreement led to borders being drawn that could never be agreed upon and has led to constant struggle in the middle east, be it between kurds and arabs or shia amd sunnis.
I think this is a fair interpretation.
So my question is, do you think there will ever be stable borders in the region, or will the conflicts simply continue until one dominates the other?
>>2568930 (OP)
>Jews, Muslims and Christians lived in relative peace.
Christians had it worse than Blacks and Asians had it under European empires.
>>2568930
There has to be some kind of internal impetus to develop something other than yet another despotic state to keep them quiet
but unfortunately even if there were, they're currently engaged in a battle to the death with literal crazy people that execute hostages with detcord
>>2568950
>Muh historic revisionism based on my own biases
>>2568905
That's the best one
Here's one I was working on, I'd like feedback
>>2569392
>Argentina under Peron
I would recommend the shitfest that came after, including the time when our naval air force bombed our capital
"The Quran has been around 1300 years, but "Islamic" terrorism is only 20 years old. Are you really that dumb to think the problem is Islam"
https://twitter.com/cjwerleman/status/742111811516801024
>>2568877
>"Islamic" terrorism is only 20 years old
Sure, if you're not counting the Barbary pirates
>>2568877
> Islamic terrorism is only 20 years old
More like 1000 years old
Rofl but Big Mo himself was a violent terrorist
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad
post interesting characters from ww1 and ww2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savitri_Devi
Obscure dude
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler
She's not really WW2 so much as she lived in the era and interacted with the governments from that era in an academic sense.
>>2568870
Why were nutjobs and WEWUZ X people so prominent in Nazism?
What was life like on the borders of al-Andalus? Were people allowed to enter and leave freely?
Protected borders are the modern invention.
>>2568829
no
they had papers
>>2568833
this
borders were a lot less defined amd generally based on the local count's loyalty. the borders of counties were based on individual villages and rivers.
>How do you know so much about the Holocaust and the Early Church Fathers, anon?
wat do
>>2568745
me in the back
...I read.
Why do girls look so satanic?
Which side are you on /his/?
>>2568627
It's difficult to choose because I hate most of the people on both side.
What sort of faggot shit is this
>Lenin was an Assassin
>Stalin was a Templar
Why did Stalin ruin gommunism?
So Nietzche's 'eternal recurrence' thought-experiment is actually true, right?
While it can be true in some philosophical way, but you need highly esoteric and truly elaborate cosmology to support it in purely physical sense.
>>2568665
>but you need highly esoteric and truly elaborate cosmology to support it in purely physical sense.
No you don't.
You need a Big Bang, after which the Universe keeps expanding until it reaches a point where it can no longer do so and so the Universe contracts once more into an infinitely dense point (the so-called 'Big Crunch').
The Big Bang occurs again, at this point.
>>2568816
You need hard determinism on top of all that for events to repeat itself or it would be just another universe with barely anything same.
My list is as follows:
1) Socrates
2) Jesus Christ
3) Euclid
4) Plato
5) Isaac Newton
6) Euler
7) Muhammad
8) Archimedes
9) Founding Fathers of the United States (collectively, for their contributions to America's creation, though they may not be equal, were all necesarry)
10) Alan Turing
Honorable Mentions: Julius Caesar, Hippocrates, William Shakespeare, Homer, Alexander the Great, Moses, Charles Darwin, Adam Smith, Ransom Olds, Buddha, Genghis Kahn, Adolf Hitler, Leonardo da Vinci
you forgot confusius
>>2568552
Could it be that we don't know their names?
What were the names of the people who 'invented' agriculture?
Who knows what person had some small, yet very significant influence on how things turned out.
Not a bad list OP, but I think Einstein deserves a honorable mention
>>2568571
>Could it be that we don't know their names?
Ad hoc