Archived threads in /ic/ - Artwork/Critique - 436. page

>>2888597

That reminds me of London, to be honest. So many nights walking alone watching the rotten orange sky, hiding away each an every star that might have wished me luck.

And despite how disgusting it was, I miss it.

File: photo.jpg (1MB, 1936x1936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1936x1936px

>>2888618

that sounds kinda crappy and lovely i know whatchu mean

i live in the northeast Pennsylvania in between the suburbs and rural parts after living in austin tx and its just not the same

the only thing that captures me is this lack of aesthetic aesthetic grayness on moonlight evenings

https://vimeo.com/127234656

File: 1427942183821.jpg (398KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1680x1050px

From the thumbnail I thought that was an edit of Rustle's desk.

File: 1484967238759.jpg (81KB, 1080x1063px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1080x1063px

>>2887805
What's this stuff you keep posting? What are your influences?

Genuinely curious

>>2887805
Blog?

>>2881895
Who is this Derek and is he a good artist? Where's his blog? His hand writing is really nice, that's for sure.

>>2881923

Don't worry about who I am (-:

I was too much of a spastic cunt around an artist I look up to, now he doesn't respect me anymore

How do i fix this

>>2887840
very bad idea, an ipad can't replace a pc

>>2887840

/g/entooman here, get a fucking lenovo yogabook

>>2887840
It isn't very clear, but what I think you mean is that you believe your tablet needs to double as the monitor displaying the drawing

Do NOT do this. Your potential for drawing will be halved if you opt for an ipad or windows tablet over a wacom. It's an understandable worry for a beginner, but I promise you everyone gets used to a pen on a wacom very quickly

It is a terrible place where people lacking knowledge give awful critics, and mistake shitting all over someone as "harsh criticism".

There are some good resources shared, that's the only point of coming here.

>>2883709
>>2883722
I agree, this place is pretty cancerous.

I feel like half of /ic/ are just people who want to get gud

and the other half are shitposters who draw once in a blue moon

>>2888114
We would appreciate if you use google, instead of shitposting here.

>>2888114
check "1000 Nudes" by Michael Koetzle. It's full of vintage refs only, I thinks it may suits your needs. plus, it's very cheap.

File: 10601-1942872447.jpg (684KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 900x1350px

postin' some to set the tone

>>2887056
Honestly it's dangerous as fuck to try to find some universal "rules" on what makes a good workflow, especially since digital is such a flexible medium. The best workflow is the one that works for you personally, and there are numerous different approaches that often contradict each other but are all equally valid.

Also if you always stick with exactly the same workflow you will always get the same end result. This might be desirable for client work since it is consistent, but it can potentially be harmful for your own personal growth.

>>2887082
You speak wisely.

I'd like to have one line based clean workflow that produces consistent results that I'll be using to draw porn and build up a fanbase.
On my personal blog, I'll try to get into a lineless concept art and experimenting, so that I can land a job in a studio once porn starts to bore me.

File: luminosity.png (880KB, 668x808px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 668x808px

one process i use often is to make the entire painting in greyscale, then make it a luminosity layer. By painting beneath the luminosity layer you can change the hue and saturation without affecting value so you can use all sorts of filters and crazy nonsense without ruining your values.

If you hate happy accidents and like to have complete control over everything, it's usually a reliable process.

here's a really sloppy example using greygirl

No, because this is the fake frank. Papafranku would never do that to us

What am I looking at?

>>2880262
what did frank go to college for ? was always curious

>>2888193
Thank you!

pretentious

>>2887997

Looks like a separate color dodge layer. You can also have a saturation layer to play up the colored fringing in the edges of the light. You can ofcourse also paint everything straight. Depends on your workflow and what style you're after.

god tier

>>2887322

High school freshman project/10

>>2887322
For an oil painting, the artist did good at making it look like it was made in Photoshop. So that's cool.

>>2887150

I love your painting, it truly resonates with my soul.

>>2887153
great lets make a baby

>>2887153
an if your a guy. lets buttsex and adopt a baby.

>>2886402
>linkedin.
Original link for an original painter. Thanks for the culture.

File: pic4.jpg (681KB, 2000x1392px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 2000x1392px

My best Collection From His Works

>>2886421
Very colorful. Nice discovery!

>>2885633
>easy to use app

There are many but I find them all difficult to use. Not impossibly difficult to use it just sucks if you're in the mood of drawing and don't want to spend half an hour posing a Mannequin...

I found the mannequin very useful to own to help with foreshortening issues, and to think about form and mass (it is better to actualy precieve something in real 3d than to have a computer projected abstraction), but it is very limited in poses.

As for app I own the Skelly App by Proko, but I didn't find it very useful.

File: IMG_1474.jpg (97KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 480x640px

mannikins aren't for studying. They're more of a tool to help you draw from imagination.