Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1598. page

Why does he have four stars I thought he never made it beyond three.

He stole their jet technology

>>2463118

Phosphorous mortar rounds.

>>2463098
For example it has been shown that wars in general tend to promote social equality. Especially as thearly scale of the war increases. This in part because to get the poorer people to fight you must give them things and these things come from the rich who actually have stuff.

Hear me out for a second. War is awful, but I still think of it as a net positive, in the long-term at least. Nothing drives the development of science and technology as much as warfare does. World War I is a pretty good example of this. It started with cavalry and ended with tanks and aircraft.

>>2463135
The question is would those advancements have taken place anyway and is it worth the cost for accelerating technological development

post-modernism is gay

>>2463092
The whole "post-fact" idea implies a previous era of objective truth which did not exist.

File: 5192ccaa6e0834d7106fd577596b90dc[1].jpg (1MB, 1400x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x1000px

I prefer Modernism/Futurism tbfwyl (To Be Frank With You Lad)

Top o' the mornin' to ya OP.

Braveheart is really all you need.

t. Proud Scottish-American

Picts > Englands bitch > Flower of the englightenment > England bitch

like scots would write their history lmao

Kissinger tried to fob him off and Assad told him to fuck off.

That's the magic of power anon

No Baron Evola = shit chart.

>>2462968
>tfw you were going to put him in too

>>2462910
>Stirner isn't on the list right below Lao Tzu

>>2462832
I actually had a tankie on this very board tell me that Ukraine is "prone to famines" so it was natural. Get this, Ukraine, the fucking breadbasket of Europe, being prone to famines. Unreal.

>>2462846
Why is Ukraine so dirt poor today with a huge death rate (before the Donbas war)

>>2462854
>dirt poor today
corruption as a result of commie lifestyle

>huge death rate
western ukraine is statistically doing fine (the part that is closest to poland and was most active during the 2014 protests)

enlightenment was a mistake
monarchism isn't the answer

>>2462808
Can you elaborate?

Pretty much all enlightenment philosophers were monarchists.

/thread.

>>2462724
they're bullshit like every other non scientific ism

>>2462724
>corporatism
society its organized politically by social class, like something akin to the guild system of the middle ages (which was an inspiration)
>Syndicalism
trade unions run the economy as an alternative to capitalism. in theory it isn't limited by the nation but is spread all over the world.
>National Syndicalism
syndicalism but within the boundaries of the nation state. over time though the original syndicalist ideas were diluted out. It found the most success in italy, where the natsyndicalists were extreme nationalists and were antidemocratic, antimarxist and antipacifist. They wanted to overthrow italy's parliamentary monarchy and replace it with a technocratic economy where all classes were accomodated and unified in their interests (i.e. it had corporatist elements). They believed Italy needed to get colonies in order to rid itself of exploitation from France and Britain. As they saw it italy was a "proletarian nation". A lot of the national syndicalists went on to become fascists.
>Integralism
provided the inspiration for national syndicalism (NS). it was founded by french radical national maurras, and it shared a lot of features with NS. Like NS it was agressively nationalist, anti-individualist, anti-liberal. It advocated statism and corporatism/class unity/guild system/ trade unionism (depending on whichever advocate you talked to in the early 20th century). I get the impression that it was more conservative than NS, in that it supported hierarchy, authoritarianism, conservatism/catholic orthodoxy (whereas NS was modernist/futurist, even atheistic and anti-clerical). I'm even sure integralism could be monarchist, and the monarch would be a figure for national unity.

>corporatism
Term in social science used for the inclusion of business and labour interests into policymaking, as opposed to pluralism which is more associated with lobbyists. The prime example of corporatism is the so-called 'tripartism', which is an ongoing partnership between business, labout and state.

Some will say that corporatism is strictly a fascist idea. It is not.

>>2462722
They're both cowards.

File: 1466151776218.jpg (53KB, 650x821px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 650x821px

>>2462722
>you live in a timeline where you can choose to be one of 58 genders

>>2462719
I'll give you a hint, and it will anger many, but another more recent General shares both his name and ancestry which undoubtedly greased the wheels for both of their promotions.

>>2462742
http://www.jweekly.com/2003/09/18/wesley-clark-comes-from-a-long-line-of-rabbis/

He was a friend of Dwight Eisehower.

To be honest, you can use History in pretty much any area of the Humanities if you stretch it a bit.
And knows the right persons, of course.

>>2462679
Law school is your best bet

>>2463502
And rack up ~$200k dollars in debt to be tethered to one location, work 60 hours a week and only get paid $40k a year? Bad idea.

>>2462649
There are different kinds of proud. Being proud of yourself, and being proud in others. When people say they're proud of their country, they mean that they're proud of all the people who worked to make that country great, and hope to continue contributing in the greatness of their country.

>>2462658
So are you saying that people are proud to be a part of a group? And so they are proud to be a part of a country that they see as great?

I'm still having a hard time wrapping my head around this. Most people are in the country that they're in because they just happened to be born there. Even if you see that place as great, it all just goes back to it being retarded to be proud of something you didn't work for.

You don't have to work to be born in the place that you're born in. it just happens.

I think that people give different meanings to what pride actually gives motion, just as any abstract word such as love, honor and good and evil. It's a social regulator for a pattern for a social being to adapt itself.

If you dont have national pride, you might be ill seen by those who take part in using that word for a behaviour that is palatable for a good life. Yet some live with the desire to love lack of commitment to the country they live in. But since you were born, you are thrown in a relation of power between everything that lives, so you might be as well join the fold of those who favor you while others do not or might help but you don't know for sure. The concept of national pride helps you go through that.

I think it is a useful artifice, but blinds people with stupid criteria for living which make the world as it is.

>>2462599
There is no debate.

>>2462599
Egyptian Dynasties changed their Kingship to various different racial profiles. While I agree that general populace might have been an admixture of phenotypes thus Brown. The Ruler elites changed.

The earlier dynasties are difficult to pinpoint but middle dynasties before unification could have been Semitic in origin and thus Middle-eastern in complexion. After Nubian conquest, it would have been black for brief time while gradually eschewing towards brown.

>>2462611

Tell that to pol.

No, Iron Working came about independently in the Middle East, Europe, and China.

No, that shit got discovered a couple different times.

Iron working was introduced to Europe in the late 11th century BC,[21] probably from the Caucasus, and slowly spread northwards and westwards over the succeeding 500 years. The widespread use of the technology of iron was implemented in Europe simultaneously with Asia.